Cargando…
Consequences of supplementing duck's diet with charcoal on carcass criteria, meat quality, nutritional composition, and bacterial load
The influence of charcoal as feed additives on carcass and meat characteristics was studied in 144 four weeks old Muller ducks. The experimental ducklings were assigned to six groups of 24 birds (Eight per replicates each). The dietary treatments contained 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5% charcoal fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36427400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102275 |
_version_ | 1784839215671934976 |
---|---|
author | Farghly, Mohamed F.A. Elsagheer, Mohamed A. Jghef, Muthana M. Taha, Ayman E. Abd El-Hack, Mohamed E. Jaremko, Mariusz El-Tarabily, Khaled A. Shabaan, Mahmoud |
author_facet | Farghly, Mohamed F.A. Elsagheer, Mohamed A. Jghef, Muthana M. Taha, Ayman E. Abd El-Hack, Mohamed E. Jaremko, Mariusz El-Tarabily, Khaled A. Shabaan, Mahmoud |
author_sort | Farghly, Mohamed F.A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The influence of charcoal as feed additives on carcass and meat characteristics was studied in 144 four weeks old Muller ducks. The experimental ducklings were assigned to six groups of 24 birds (Eight per replicates each). The dietary treatments contained 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5% charcoal for G1 (C), G2 (L1), G3 (L2), G4 (L3), G5 (L4) and G6 (L5), respectively. All experimental birds were raised under similar environmental and managerial conditions. Results indicated that charcoal did not affect most carcass traits significantly except for dressing percentage was higher (P < 0.05) in 1.5 and 2 % charcoal included ducks diets compared to control ducks. Charcoal supplementation significantly affected duck meat tenderness, juiciness and water holding capacity. Moreover, charcoal altered (P < 0.05) meat components such as crude protein, calcium components, desirable fatty acids, nutritional value and some bacterial counts. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances reduced in birds fed charcoal at 1.5, 2, and 2.5%, with significant variation among treatments. No significant differences in the number of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were detected among the ducks fed with charcoal and the control group. It could be concluded that charcoal could be included in ducks’ diets at 1.5 and 2% with beneficial effects on carcass parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9700026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97000262022-11-27 Consequences of supplementing duck's diet with charcoal on carcass criteria, meat quality, nutritional composition, and bacterial load Farghly, Mohamed F.A. Elsagheer, Mohamed A. Jghef, Muthana M. Taha, Ayman E. Abd El-Hack, Mohamed E. Jaremko, Mariusz El-Tarabily, Khaled A. Shabaan, Mahmoud Poult Sci PROCESSING AND PRODUCT The influence of charcoal as feed additives on carcass and meat characteristics was studied in 144 four weeks old Muller ducks. The experimental ducklings were assigned to six groups of 24 birds (Eight per replicates each). The dietary treatments contained 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5% charcoal for G1 (C), G2 (L1), G3 (L2), G4 (L3), G5 (L4) and G6 (L5), respectively. All experimental birds were raised under similar environmental and managerial conditions. Results indicated that charcoal did not affect most carcass traits significantly except for dressing percentage was higher (P < 0.05) in 1.5 and 2 % charcoal included ducks diets compared to control ducks. Charcoal supplementation significantly affected duck meat tenderness, juiciness and water holding capacity. Moreover, charcoal altered (P < 0.05) meat components such as crude protein, calcium components, desirable fatty acids, nutritional value and some bacterial counts. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances reduced in birds fed charcoal at 1.5, 2, and 2.5%, with significant variation among treatments. No significant differences in the number of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were detected among the ducks fed with charcoal and the control group. It could be concluded that charcoal could be included in ducks’ diets at 1.5 and 2% with beneficial effects on carcass parameters. Elsevier 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9700026/ /pubmed/36427400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102275 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | PROCESSING AND PRODUCT Farghly, Mohamed F.A. Elsagheer, Mohamed A. Jghef, Muthana M. Taha, Ayman E. Abd El-Hack, Mohamed E. Jaremko, Mariusz El-Tarabily, Khaled A. Shabaan, Mahmoud Consequences of supplementing duck's diet with charcoal on carcass criteria, meat quality, nutritional composition, and bacterial load |
title | Consequences of supplementing duck's diet with charcoal on carcass criteria, meat quality, nutritional composition, and bacterial load |
title_full | Consequences of supplementing duck's diet with charcoal on carcass criteria, meat quality, nutritional composition, and bacterial load |
title_fullStr | Consequences of supplementing duck's diet with charcoal on carcass criteria, meat quality, nutritional composition, and bacterial load |
title_full_unstemmed | Consequences of supplementing duck's diet with charcoal on carcass criteria, meat quality, nutritional composition, and bacterial load |
title_short | Consequences of supplementing duck's diet with charcoal on carcass criteria, meat quality, nutritional composition, and bacterial load |
title_sort | consequences of supplementing duck's diet with charcoal on carcass criteria, meat quality, nutritional composition, and bacterial load |
topic | PROCESSING AND PRODUCT |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36427400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102275 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farghlymohamedfa consequencesofsupplementingducksdietwithcharcoaloncarcasscriteriameatqualitynutritionalcompositionandbacterialload AT elsagheermohameda consequencesofsupplementingducksdietwithcharcoaloncarcasscriteriameatqualitynutritionalcompositionandbacterialload AT jghefmuthanam consequencesofsupplementingducksdietwithcharcoaloncarcasscriteriameatqualitynutritionalcompositionandbacterialload AT tahaaymane consequencesofsupplementingducksdietwithcharcoaloncarcasscriteriameatqualitynutritionalcompositionandbacterialload AT abdelhackmohamede consequencesofsupplementingducksdietwithcharcoaloncarcasscriteriameatqualitynutritionalcompositionandbacterialload AT jaremkomariusz consequencesofsupplementingducksdietwithcharcoaloncarcasscriteriameatqualitynutritionalcompositionandbacterialload AT eltarabilykhaleda consequencesofsupplementingducksdietwithcharcoaloncarcasscriteriameatqualitynutritionalcompositionandbacterialload AT shabaanmahmoud consequencesofsupplementingducksdietwithcharcoaloncarcasscriteriameatqualitynutritionalcompositionandbacterialload |