Cargando…

The effects of augmented and virtual reality gait training on balance and gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease

OBJECTIVE: Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) facilitate motor learning by enabling the practice of task-specific activities in a rich environment. Therefore, AR and VR gait training may improve balance and gait in Parkinson’s Disease (PD). METHODS: Thirty patients with PD were randomly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gulcan, Kubilay, Guclu-Gunduz, Arzu, Yasar, Evren, Ar, Ulas, Sucullu Karadag, Yesim, Saygili, Fettah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13760-022-02147-0
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) facilitate motor learning by enabling the practice of task-specific activities in a rich environment. Therefore, AR and VR gait training may improve balance and gait in Parkinson’s Disease (PD). METHODS: Thirty patients with PD were randomly divided into study (n = 15) and control (n = 15) groups. The study group was given AR and VR gait training combined with conventional training. The control group was given conventional training only. The training was applied to both groups 3 days a week for 6 weeks. Motor symptoms with the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale-Motor Examination (UPDRS-III), balance with posturography and Berg Balance Scale (BBS), perceived balance confidence with Activity-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), gait with spatio-temporal gait analysis, and functional mobility with Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) were assessed. RESULTS: At the end of the study; UPDRS-III, posturography measurements, BBS, ABC, spatio-temporal gait parameters, and TUG improved in the study group (p < 0.05), while BBS, ABC, and only spatial gait parameters (except for step width) improved in the control group (p < 0.05). There was no change in posturography measurement, temporal gait parameters, and TUG in control group (p > 0.05). When the developed parameters in both groups were compared, the amount of improvement in BBS and ABC was found similar (p > 0.05), while the improvement in the other parameters was found higher in the study group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that AR and VR gait training provides the opportunity to practice walking with different tasks in increasingly difficult environments, thus improving balance and walking by facilitating motor learning.