Cargando…

The effect of e-learning on point-of-care ultrasound education in novices

BACKGROUND: Current studies assessed the learning efficacy of e-learning in ultrasound (US) training using questionnaires, or simulation in well-controlled conditions. This study investigates the effect of e-learning on the clinical US performance of the first postgraduate year (PGY-1) residents. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lien, Wan-Ching, Lin, Phone, Chang, Chih-Heng, Wu, Meng-Che, Wu, Cheng-Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2152522
_version_ 1784840703100059648
author Lien, Wan-Ching
Lin, Phone
Chang, Chih-Heng
Wu, Meng-Che
Wu, Cheng-Yi
author_facet Lien, Wan-Ching
Lin, Phone
Chang, Chih-Heng
Wu, Meng-Che
Wu, Cheng-Yi
author_sort Lien, Wan-Ching
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current studies assessed the learning efficacy of e-learning in ultrasound (US) training using questionnaires, or simulation in well-controlled conditions. This study investigates the effect of e-learning on the clinical US performance of the first postgraduate year (PGY-1) residents. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we enrolled PGY-1 and second postgraduate year (PGY-2) residents. The e-learning was introduced on the first day and each PGY-1 was authorized to access the e-learning platform. The point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) curriculum for the focused assessment of sonography for trauma (FAST) was conducted on the 7(th) day for PGY-1 and the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) followed. The PGY-2 received bedside one-to-one random learning before the study and did not have the authorization to access the e-learning. The FAST examinations performed by the PGY-1 and PGY-2 were collected on the 30th day. The clinical FAST performance was assessed by the instructor not involved in the curriculum and blinded to the use of e-learning, including numbers, image quality, and diagnostic accuracy between PGY-1 e-learning users, non-users, and the PGY-2. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy PGY-1 with 736 FAST examinations and 53 PGY-2 residents with 134 examinations were included. Seventy PGY-1 used e-learning with a median time spent of 13.2 mins (IQR, 6.5–21.1 mins) at the first access. The PGY-2 had more PoCUS experience than the PGY-1, however, the 70 e-learning users performed more FAST examinations than the PGY-2 (median [IQR], 4 [2–6] vs. 2 [1–3], p = 0.0004) and had better image quality than the PGY-2 (3 [3–3.2] vs. 3 [2.7–3], p = 0.044). There were no significant differences in the diagnostic accuracy between the PGY-1 and PGY-2. CONCLUSIONS: E-learning has a positive effect on US learning. The PGY-1 users had comparable performance with the PGY-2 and even better image acquisition although the PGY-2 had more PoCUS experience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03738033 at ClinicalTrials.gov.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9707377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97073772022-11-30 The effect of e-learning on point-of-care ultrasound education in novices Lien, Wan-Ching Lin, Phone Chang, Chih-Heng Wu, Meng-Che Wu, Cheng-Yi Med Educ Online Research Article BACKGROUND: Current studies assessed the learning efficacy of e-learning in ultrasound (US) training using questionnaires, or simulation in well-controlled conditions. This study investigates the effect of e-learning on the clinical US performance of the first postgraduate year (PGY-1) residents. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we enrolled PGY-1 and second postgraduate year (PGY-2) residents. The e-learning was introduced on the first day and each PGY-1 was authorized to access the e-learning platform. The point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) curriculum for the focused assessment of sonography for trauma (FAST) was conducted on the 7(th) day for PGY-1 and the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) followed. The PGY-2 received bedside one-to-one random learning before the study and did not have the authorization to access the e-learning. The FAST examinations performed by the PGY-1 and PGY-2 were collected on the 30th day. The clinical FAST performance was assessed by the instructor not involved in the curriculum and blinded to the use of e-learning, including numbers, image quality, and diagnostic accuracy between PGY-1 e-learning users, non-users, and the PGY-2. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy PGY-1 with 736 FAST examinations and 53 PGY-2 residents with 134 examinations were included. Seventy PGY-1 used e-learning with a median time spent of 13.2 mins (IQR, 6.5–21.1 mins) at the first access. The PGY-2 had more PoCUS experience than the PGY-1, however, the 70 e-learning users performed more FAST examinations than the PGY-2 (median [IQR], 4 [2–6] vs. 2 [1–3], p = 0.0004) and had better image quality than the PGY-2 (3 [3–3.2] vs. 3 [2.7–3], p = 0.044). There were no significant differences in the diagnostic accuracy between the PGY-1 and PGY-2. CONCLUSIONS: E-learning has a positive effect on US learning. The PGY-1 users had comparable performance with the PGY-2 and even better image acquisition although the PGY-2 had more PoCUS experience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03738033 at ClinicalTrials.gov. Taylor & Francis 2022-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9707377/ /pubmed/36433837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2152522 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lien, Wan-Ching
Lin, Phone
Chang, Chih-Heng
Wu, Meng-Che
Wu, Cheng-Yi
The effect of e-learning on point-of-care ultrasound education in novices
title The effect of e-learning on point-of-care ultrasound education in novices
title_full The effect of e-learning on point-of-care ultrasound education in novices
title_fullStr The effect of e-learning on point-of-care ultrasound education in novices
title_full_unstemmed The effect of e-learning on point-of-care ultrasound education in novices
title_short The effect of e-learning on point-of-care ultrasound education in novices
title_sort effect of e-learning on point-of-care ultrasound education in novices
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36433837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2152522
work_keys_str_mv AT lienwanching theeffectofelearningonpointofcareultrasoundeducationinnovices
AT linphone theeffectofelearningonpointofcareultrasoundeducationinnovices
AT changchihheng theeffectofelearningonpointofcareultrasoundeducationinnovices
AT wumengche theeffectofelearningonpointofcareultrasoundeducationinnovices
AT wuchengyi theeffectofelearningonpointofcareultrasoundeducationinnovices
AT lienwanching effectofelearningonpointofcareultrasoundeducationinnovices
AT linphone effectofelearningonpointofcareultrasoundeducationinnovices
AT changchihheng effectofelearningonpointofcareultrasoundeducationinnovices
AT wumengche effectofelearningonpointofcareultrasoundeducationinnovices
AT wuchengyi effectofelearningonpointofcareultrasoundeducationinnovices