Cargando…

Epigenomic signatures associated with spontaneous and replication stress-induced DNA double strand breaks

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are specific regions of all individuals’ genome that are predisposed to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and undergo subsequent rearrangements. CFS formation can be induced in vitro by mild level of DNA replication stress, such as DNA polymerase inhibition or nucleotide po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kodali, Sravan, Meyer-Nava, Silvia, Landry, Stephen, Chakraborty, Arijita, Rivera-Mulia, Juan Carlos, Feng, Wenyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506300
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.907547
_version_ 1784845766116769792
author Kodali, Sravan
Meyer-Nava, Silvia
Landry, Stephen
Chakraborty, Arijita
Rivera-Mulia, Juan Carlos
Feng, Wenyi
author_facet Kodali, Sravan
Meyer-Nava, Silvia
Landry, Stephen
Chakraborty, Arijita
Rivera-Mulia, Juan Carlos
Feng, Wenyi
author_sort Kodali, Sravan
collection PubMed
description Common fragile sites (CFSs) are specific regions of all individuals’ genome that are predisposed to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and undergo subsequent rearrangements. CFS formation can be induced in vitro by mild level of DNA replication stress, such as DNA polymerase inhibition or nucleotide pool disturbance. The mechanisms of CFS formation have been linked to DNA replication timing control, transcription activities, as well as chromatin organization. However, it is unclear what specific cis- or trans-factors regulate the interplay between replication and transcription that determine CFS formation. We recently reported genome-wide mapping of DNA DSBs under replication stress induced by aphidicolin in human lymphoblastoids for the first time. Here, we systematically compared these DSBs with regards to nearby epigenomic features mapped in the same cell line from published studies. We demonstrate that aphidicolin-induced DSBs are strongly correlated with histone 3 lysine 36 trimethylation, a marker for active transcription. We further demonstrate that this DSB signature is a composite effect by the dual treatment of aphidicolin and its solvent, dimethylsulfoxide, the latter of which potently induces transcription on its own. We also present complementing evidence for the association between DSBs and 3D chromosome architectural domains with high density gene cluster and active transcription. Additionally, we show that while DSBs were detected at all but one of the fourteen finely mapped CFSs, they were not enriched in the CFS core sequences and rather demarcated the CFS core region. Related to this point, DSB density was not higher in large genes of greater than 300 kb, contrary to reported enrichment of CFS sites at these large genes. Finally, replication timing analyses demonstrate that the CFS core region contain initiation events, suggesting that altered replication dynamics are responsible for CFS formation in relatively higher level of replication stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9730818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97308182022-12-09 Epigenomic signatures associated with spontaneous and replication stress-induced DNA double strand breaks Kodali, Sravan Meyer-Nava, Silvia Landry, Stephen Chakraborty, Arijita Rivera-Mulia, Juan Carlos Feng, Wenyi Front Genet Genetics Common fragile sites (CFSs) are specific regions of all individuals’ genome that are predisposed to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and undergo subsequent rearrangements. CFS formation can be induced in vitro by mild level of DNA replication stress, such as DNA polymerase inhibition or nucleotide pool disturbance. The mechanisms of CFS formation have been linked to DNA replication timing control, transcription activities, as well as chromatin organization. However, it is unclear what specific cis- or trans-factors regulate the interplay between replication and transcription that determine CFS formation. We recently reported genome-wide mapping of DNA DSBs under replication stress induced by aphidicolin in human lymphoblastoids for the first time. Here, we systematically compared these DSBs with regards to nearby epigenomic features mapped in the same cell line from published studies. We demonstrate that aphidicolin-induced DSBs are strongly correlated with histone 3 lysine 36 trimethylation, a marker for active transcription. We further demonstrate that this DSB signature is a composite effect by the dual treatment of aphidicolin and its solvent, dimethylsulfoxide, the latter of which potently induces transcription on its own. We also present complementing evidence for the association between DSBs and 3D chromosome architectural domains with high density gene cluster and active transcription. Additionally, we show that while DSBs were detected at all but one of the fourteen finely mapped CFSs, they were not enriched in the CFS core sequences and rather demarcated the CFS core region. Related to this point, DSB density was not higher in large genes of greater than 300 kb, contrary to reported enrichment of CFS sites at these large genes. Finally, replication timing analyses demonstrate that the CFS core region contain initiation events, suggesting that altered replication dynamics are responsible for CFS formation in relatively higher level of replication stress. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9730818/ /pubmed/36506300 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.907547 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kodali, Meyer-Nava, Landry, Chakraborty, Rivera-Mulia and Feng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Kodali, Sravan
Meyer-Nava, Silvia
Landry, Stephen
Chakraborty, Arijita
Rivera-Mulia, Juan Carlos
Feng, Wenyi
Epigenomic signatures associated with spontaneous and replication stress-induced DNA double strand breaks
title Epigenomic signatures associated with spontaneous and replication stress-induced DNA double strand breaks
title_full Epigenomic signatures associated with spontaneous and replication stress-induced DNA double strand breaks
title_fullStr Epigenomic signatures associated with spontaneous and replication stress-induced DNA double strand breaks
title_full_unstemmed Epigenomic signatures associated with spontaneous and replication stress-induced DNA double strand breaks
title_short Epigenomic signatures associated with spontaneous and replication stress-induced DNA double strand breaks
title_sort epigenomic signatures associated with spontaneous and replication stress-induced dna double strand breaks
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506300
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.907547
work_keys_str_mv AT kodalisravan epigenomicsignaturesassociatedwithspontaneousandreplicationstressinduceddnadoublestrandbreaks
AT meyernavasilvia epigenomicsignaturesassociatedwithspontaneousandreplicationstressinduceddnadoublestrandbreaks
AT landrystephen epigenomicsignaturesassociatedwithspontaneousandreplicationstressinduceddnadoublestrandbreaks
AT chakrabortyarijita epigenomicsignaturesassociatedwithspontaneousandreplicationstressinduceddnadoublestrandbreaks
AT riveramuliajuancarlos epigenomicsignaturesassociatedwithspontaneousandreplicationstressinduceddnadoublestrandbreaks
AT fengwenyi epigenomicsignaturesassociatedwithspontaneousandreplicationstressinduceddnadoublestrandbreaks