Cargando…

Opinion on the re‐evaluation of sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups

Sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) was re‐evaluated in 2018 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of E 466 for its uses as a foo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younes, Maged, Aquilina, Gabriele, Castle, Laurence, Degen, Gisela, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Fowler, Paul J, Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose, Fürst, Peter, Gürtler, Rainer, Husøy, Trine, Manco, Melania, Mennes, Wim, Moldeus, Peter, Passamonti, Sabina, Shah, Romina, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine, Wright, Matthew, Dusemund, Birgit, Mortensen, Alicja, Turck, Dominique, Wölfle, Detlef, Barmaz, Stefania, Mech, Agnieszka, Rincon, Ana Maria, Tard, Alexandra, Vianello, Giorgia, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36514369
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7665
_version_ 1784846192829530112
author Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Degen, Gisela
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul J
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wright, Matthew
Dusemund, Birgit
Mortensen, Alicja
Turck, Dominique
Wölfle, Detlef
Barmaz, Stefania
Mech, Agnieszka
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Vianello, Giorgia
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
author_facet Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Degen, Gisela
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul J
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wright, Matthew
Dusemund, Birgit
Mortensen, Alicja
Turck, Dominique
Wölfle, Detlef
Barmaz, Stefania
Mech, Agnieszka
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Vianello, Giorgia
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
collection PubMed
description Sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) was re‐evaluated in 2018 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of E 466 for its uses as a food additive in food for infants below 16 weeks of age belonging to food categories (FC) 13.1.5.1 (Dietary foods for infants for special medical purposes and special formulae for infants) in line with Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. In addition, the FAF Panel was requested to address the issues already identified during the re‐evaluation of the food additive when used in food for the general population, including the safety assessment for FC 13.1.5.1 and 13.1.5.2 (Dietary foods for babies and young children for special medical purposes as defined in directive 1999/21/EC). The process involved the publication of a call for data. Based on the received data, the Panel concluded that the technical data provided by the interested business operator support an amendment of the specifications for sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) laid down in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012. The interested business operators declared that E 466 is not used in food for infants below 16 weeks of age and in FC 13.1.5.1. Due to the lack of data, an assessment has not been performed for this FC and age group. The interested business operators did not provide biological and toxicological data to support the uses of E 466 in FC 13.1.5.2. Due to the almost unchanged database compared to the situation before the call for data, the FAF Panel confirmed the previous EFSA ANS Panel conclusion according to which the available data did not allow for an adequate assessment of the safety of use of sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) in infants and young children consuming foods belonging to the FC 13.1.5.2. ©2022 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9732683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97326832022-12-12 Opinion on the re‐evaluation of sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Dusemund, Birgit Mortensen, Alicja Turck, Dominique Wölfle, Detlef Barmaz, Stefania Mech, Agnieszka Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Vianello, Giorgia Gundert‐Remy, Ursula EFSA J Scientific Opinion Sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) was re‐evaluated in 2018 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of E 466 for its uses as a food additive in food for infants below 16 weeks of age belonging to food categories (FC) 13.1.5.1 (Dietary foods for infants for special medical purposes and special formulae for infants) in line with Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. In addition, the FAF Panel was requested to address the issues already identified during the re‐evaluation of the food additive when used in food for the general population, including the safety assessment for FC 13.1.5.1 and 13.1.5.2 (Dietary foods for babies and young children for special medical purposes as defined in directive 1999/21/EC). The process involved the publication of a call for data. Based on the received data, the Panel concluded that the technical data provided by the interested business operator support an amendment of the specifications for sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) laid down in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012. The interested business operators declared that E 466 is not used in food for infants below 16 weeks of age and in FC 13.1.5.1. Due to the lack of data, an assessment has not been performed for this FC and age group. The interested business operators did not provide biological and toxicological data to support the uses of E 466 in FC 13.1.5.2. Due to the almost unchanged database compared to the situation before the call for data, the FAF Panel confirmed the previous EFSA ANS Panel conclusion according to which the available data did not allow for an adequate assessment of the safety of use of sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) in infants and young children consuming foods belonging to the FC 13.1.5.2. ©2022 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9732683/ /pubmed/36514369 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7665 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Degen, Gisela
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul J
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wright, Matthew
Dusemund, Birgit
Mortensen, Alicja
Turck, Dominique
Wölfle, Detlef
Barmaz, Stefania
Mech, Agnieszka
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Vianello, Giorgia
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Opinion on the re‐evaluation of sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title Opinion on the re‐evaluation of sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_full Opinion on the re‐evaluation of sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_fullStr Opinion on the re‐evaluation of sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_full_unstemmed Opinion on the re‐evaluation of sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_short Opinion on the re‐evaluation of sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_sort opinion on the re‐evaluation of sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (e 466) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36514369
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7665
work_keys_str_mv AT opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT younesmaged opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT aquilinagabriele opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT castlelaurence opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT degengisela opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT engelkarlheinz opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT fowlerpaulj opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT frutosfernandezmariajose opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT furstpeter opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT gurtlerrainer opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT husøytrine opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT mancomelania opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT menneswim opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT moldeuspeter opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT passamontisabina opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT shahromina opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT waalkensberendsenine opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT wrightmatthew opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT dusemundbirgit opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT mortensenalicja opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT turckdominique opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT wolfledetlef opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT barmazstefania opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT mechagnieszka opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT rinconanamaria opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT tardalexandra opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT vianellogiorgia opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT gundertremyursula opiniononthereevaluationofsodiumcarboxymethylcellulosee466asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups