Cargando…
An Assessment of Starch Content and Gelatinization in Traditional and Non-Traditional Dog Food Formulations
SIMPLE SUMMARY: The use of novel ingredients is increasing in popularity within the pet food industry. Products utilizing both grain-free and more traditional ingredient profiles are widely available. Unfortunately, gastrointestinal impacts associated with changes in starch content and gelatinizatio...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9739134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36496878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12233357 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: The use of novel ingredients is increasing in popularity within the pet food industry. Products utilizing both grain-free and more traditional ingredient profiles are widely available. Unfortunately, gastrointestinal impacts associated with changes in starch content and gelatinization from different grain or carbohydrate sources are unknown. The purpose of this work was to measure starch content and gelatinization in commercially manufactured dry dog food products and assess differences related to ingredient profile. Gelatinized starch was proportionately lower in products manufactured with traditional ingredients (chicken, chicken by-product meal, meat and bone meal and plant-based ingredients including rice, barley, oats, and corn). Diets manufactured with non-traditional ingredients including alligator, buffalo, venison, kangaroo, squid, quail, rabbit, and salmon along with plant-based ingredients including tapioca, chickpeas, lentils, potato, and pumpkin had higher proportions of starch gelatinized. The degree of gelatinization can impact digestibility in the canine digestive tract and is an important area requiring further investigation. ABSTRACT: Starch gelatinization in pet food may be affected by moisture, retention time, and ingredients used. Starch gelatinization has been associated with changes in digestibility but is not well studied using non-traditional ingredients in canine diets. The objective of this research was to examine differences in starch content and gelatinization associated with changes in ingredient profile (traditional vs. non-traditional) and nutrient content requirements associated with differing life stages. Traditional diets (n = 10) utilizing protein sources including chicken, chicken by-product meal, meat and bone meal and plant-based ingredients including rice, barley, oats, and corn were examined in comparison with non-traditional diets (n = 10) utilizing protein sources including alligator, buffalo, venison, kangaroo, squid, quail, rabbit, and salmon along with plant-based ingredients including tapioca, chickpeas, lentils, potato, and pumpkin. Total starch and gelatinized starch (as percent of total diet) were measured with variation due to ingredient type assessed using Student’s t-test in SAS 9.4. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Total starch (as a percent of diet) was higher in traditional diets compared to non-traditional diets formulated for maintenance (p < 0.0032) or all life stages (p < 0.0128). However, starch gelatinization as a proportion of total starch was lower in traditional diets formulated for maintenance (p < 0.0165) and all life stages (p < 0.0220). Total starch and gelatinized starch had a strong negative correlation (r = −0.78; p < 0.01) in diets utilizing traditional ingredients. These novel data reveal important differences between starch content and gelatinization and may impact selection of various ingredient types by pet food manufacturers. |
---|