Cargando…

Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes

[Image: see text] Ruthenium(II) complexes feature prominently in the development of agents for photoactivated chemotherapy; however, the excited-state mechanisms by which photochemical ligand release operates remain unclear. We report here a systematic experimental and computational study of a serie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eastham, Katie, Scattergood, Paul A., Chu, Danny, Boota, Rayhaan Z., Soupart, Adrien, Alary, Fabienne, Dixon, Isabelle M., Rice, Craig R., Hardman, Samantha J. O., Elliott, Paul I. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36450138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03146
_version_ 1784849956742365184
author Eastham, Katie
Scattergood, Paul A.
Chu, Danny
Boota, Rayhaan Z.
Soupart, Adrien
Alary, Fabienne
Dixon, Isabelle M.
Rice, Craig R.
Hardman, Samantha J. O.
Elliott, Paul I. P.
author_facet Eastham, Katie
Scattergood, Paul A.
Chu, Danny
Boota, Rayhaan Z.
Soupart, Adrien
Alary, Fabienne
Dixon, Isabelle M.
Rice, Craig R.
Hardman, Samantha J. O.
Elliott, Paul I. P.
author_sort Eastham, Katie
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Ruthenium(II) complexes feature prominently in the development of agents for photoactivated chemotherapy; however, the excited-state mechanisms by which photochemical ligand release operates remain unclear. We report here a systematic experimental and computational study of a series of complexes [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridyl; N(∧)N = bpy (1), 6-methyl-2,2′-bipyridyl (2), 6,6′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridyl (3), 1-benzyl-4-(pyrid-2-yl)-1,2,3-triazole (4), 1-benzyl-4-(6-methylpyrid-2-yl)-1,2,3-triazole (5), 1,1′-dibenzyl-4,4′-bi-1,2,3-triazolyl (6)), in which we probe the contribution to the promotion of photochemical N(∧)N ligand release of the introduction of sterically encumbering methyl substituents and the electronic effect of replacement of pyridine by 1,2,3-triazole donors in the N(∧)N ligand. Complexes 2 to 6 all release the ligand N(∧)N on irradiation in acetonitrile solution to yield cis-[Ru(bpy)(2)(NCMe)(2)](2+), with resultant photorelease quantum yields that at first seem counter-intuitive and span a broad range. The data show that incorporation of a single sterically encumbering methyl substituent on the N(∧)N ligand (2 and 5) leads to a significantly enhanced rate of triplet metal-to-ligand charge-transfer ((3)MLCT) state deactivation but with little promotion of photoreactivity, whereas replacement of pyridine by triazole donors (4 and 6) leads to a similar rate of (3)MLCT deactivation but with much greater photochemical reactivity. The data reported here, discussed in conjunction with previously reported data on related complexes, suggest that monomethylation in 2 and 5 sterically inhibits the formation of a (3)MC(cis) state but promotes the population of (3)MC(trans) states which rapidly deactivate (3)MLCT states and are prone to mediating ground-state recovery. On the other hand, increased photochemical reactivity in 4 and 6 seems to stem from the accessibility of (3)MC(cis) states. The data provide important insights into the excited-state mechanism of photochemical ligand release by Ru(II) tris-bidentate complexes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9749030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97490302022-12-15 Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes Eastham, Katie Scattergood, Paul A. Chu, Danny Boota, Rayhaan Z. Soupart, Adrien Alary, Fabienne Dixon, Isabelle M. Rice, Craig R. Hardman, Samantha J. O. Elliott, Paul I. P. Inorg Chem [Image: see text] Ruthenium(II) complexes feature prominently in the development of agents for photoactivated chemotherapy; however, the excited-state mechanisms by which photochemical ligand release operates remain unclear. We report here a systematic experimental and computational study of a series of complexes [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridyl; N(∧)N = bpy (1), 6-methyl-2,2′-bipyridyl (2), 6,6′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridyl (3), 1-benzyl-4-(pyrid-2-yl)-1,2,3-triazole (4), 1-benzyl-4-(6-methylpyrid-2-yl)-1,2,3-triazole (5), 1,1′-dibenzyl-4,4′-bi-1,2,3-triazolyl (6)), in which we probe the contribution to the promotion of photochemical N(∧)N ligand release of the introduction of sterically encumbering methyl substituents and the electronic effect of replacement of pyridine by 1,2,3-triazole donors in the N(∧)N ligand. Complexes 2 to 6 all release the ligand N(∧)N on irradiation in acetonitrile solution to yield cis-[Ru(bpy)(2)(NCMe)(2)](2+), with resultant photorelease quantum yields that at first seem counter-intuitive and span a broad range. The data show that incorporation of a single sterically encumbering methyl substituent on the N(∧)N ligand (2 and 5) leads to a significantly enhanced rate of triplet metal-to-ligand charge-transfer ((3)MLCT) state deactivation but with little promotion of photoreactivity, whereas replacement of pyridine by triazole donors (4 and 6) leads to a similar rate of (3)MLCT deactivation but with much greater photochemical reactivity. The data reported here, discussed in conjunction with previously reported data on related complexes, suggest that monomethylation in 2 and 5 sterically inhibits the formation of a (3)MC(cis) state but promotes the population of (3)MC(trans) states which rapidly deactivate (3)MLCT states and are prone to mediating ground-state recovery. On the other hand, increased photochemical reactivity in 4 and 6 seems to stem from the accessibility of (3)MC(cis) states. The data provide important insights into the excited-state mechanism of photochemical ligand release by Ru(II) tris-bidentate complexes. American Chemical Society 2022-11-30 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9749030/ /pubmed/36450138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03146 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Eastham, Katie
Scattergood, Paul A.
Chu, Danny
Boota, Rayhaan Z.
Soupart, Adrien
Alary, Fabienne
Dixon, Isabelle M.
Rice, Craig R.
Hardman, Samantha J. O.
Elliott, Paul I. P.
Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes
title Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes
title_full Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes
title_fullStr Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes
title_full_unstemmed Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes
title_short Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes
title_sort not all (3)mc states are the same: the role of (3)mc(cis) states in the photochemical n(∧)n ligand release from [ru(bpy)(2)(n(∧)n)](2+) complexes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36450138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03146
work_keys_str_mv AT easthamkatie notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes
AT scattergoodpaula notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes
AT chudanny notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes
AT bootarayhaanz notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes
AT soupartadrien notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes
AT alaryfabienne notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes
AT dixonisabellem notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes
AT ricecraigr notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes
AT hardmansamanthajo notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes
AT elliottpaulip notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes