Cargando…
Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes
[Image: see text] Ruthenium(II) complexes feature prominently in the development of agents for photoactivated chemotherapy; however, the excited-state mechanisms by which photochemical ligand release operates remain unclear. We report here a systematic experimental and computational study of a serie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36450138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03146 |
_version_ | 1784849956742365184 |
---|---|
author | Eastham, Katie Scattergood, Paul A. Chu, Danny Boota, Rayhaan Z. Soupart, Adrien Alary, Fabienne Dixon, Isabelle M. Rice, Craig R. Hardman, Samantha J. O. Elliott, Paul I. P. |
author_facet | Eastham, Katie Scattergood, Paul A. Chu, Danny Boota, Rayhaan Z. Soupart, Adrien Alary, Fabienne Dixon, Isabelle M. Rice, Craig R. Hardman, Samantha J. O. Elliott, Paul I. P. |
author_sort | Eastham, Katie |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Ruthenium(II) complexes feature prominently in the development of agents for photoactivated chemotherapy; however, the excited-state mechanisms by which photochemical ligand release operates remain unclear. We report here a systematic experimental and computational study of a series of complexes [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridyl; N(∧)N = bpy (1), 6-methyl-2,2′-bipyridyl (2), 6,6′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridyl (3), 1-benzyl-4-(pyrid-2-yl)-1,2,3-triazole (4), 1-benzyl-4-(6-methylpyrid-2-yl)-1,2,3-triazole (5), 1,1′-dibenzyl-4,4′-bi-1,2,3-triazolyl (6)), in which we probe the contribution to the promotion of photochemical N(∧)N ligand release of the introduction of sterically encumbering methyl substituents and the electronic effect of replacement of pyridine by 1,2,3-triazole donors in the N(∧)N ligand. Complexes 2 to 6 all release the ligand N(∧)N on irradiation in acetonitrile solution to yield cis-[Ru(bpy)(2)(NCMe)(2)](2+), with resultant photorelease quantum yields that at first seem counter-intuitive and span a broad range. The data show that incorporation of a single sterically encumbering methyl substituent on the N(∧)N ligand (2 and 5) leads to a significantly enhanced rate of triplet metal-to-ligand charge-transfer ((3)MLCT) state deactivation but with little promotion of photoreactivity, whereas replacement of pyridine by triazole donors (4 and 6) leads to a similar rate of (3)MLCT deactivation but with much greater photochemical reactivity. The data reported here, discussed in conjunction with previously reported data on related complexes, suggest that monomethylation in 2 and 5 sterically inhibits the formation of a (3)MC(cis) state but promotes the population of (3)MC(trans) states which rapidly deactivate (3)MLCT states and are prone to mediating ground-state recovery. On the other hand, increased photochemical reactivity in 4 and 6 seems to stem from the accessibility of (3)MC(cis) states. The data provide important insights into the excited-state mechanism of photochemical ligand release by Ru(II) tris-bidentate complexes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9749030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97490302022-12-15 Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes Eastham, Katie Scattergood, Paul A. Chu, Danny Boota, Rayhaan Z. Soupart, Adrien Alary, Fabienne Dixon, Isabelle M. Rice, Craig R. Hardman, Samantha J. O. Elliott, Paul I. P. Inorg Chem [Image: see text] Ruthenium(II) complexes feature prominently in the development of agents for photoactivated chemotherapy; however, the excited-state mechanisms by which photochemical ligand release operates remain unclear. We report here a systematic experimental and computational study of a series of complexes [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridyl; N(∧)N = bpy (1), 6-methyl-2,2′-bipyridyl (2), 6,6′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridyl (3), 1-benzyl-4-(pyrid-2-yl)-1,2,3-triazole (4), 1-benzyl-4-(6-methylpyrid-2-yl)-1,2,3-triazole (5), 1,1′-dibenzyl-4,4′-bi-1,2,3-triazolyl (6)), in which we probe the contribution to the promotion of photochemical N(∧)N ligand release of the introduction of sterically encumbering methyl substituents and the electronic effect of replacement of pyridine by 1,2,3-triazole donors in the N(∧)N ligand. Complexes 2 to 6 all release the ligand N(∧)N on irradiation in acetonitrile solution to yield cis-[Ru(bpy)(2)(NCMe)(2)](2+), with resultant photorelease quantum yields that at first seem counter-intuitive and span a broad range. The data show that incorporation of a single sterically encumbering methyl substituent on the N(∧)N ligand (2 and 5) leads to a significantly enhanced rate of triplet metal-to-ligand charge-transfer ((3)MLCT) state deactivation but with little promotion of photoreactivity, whereas replacement of pyridine by triazole donors (4 and 6) leads to a similar rate of (3)MLCT deactivation but with much greater photochemical reactivity. The data reported here, discussed in conjunction with previously reported data on related complexes, suggest that monomethylation in 2 and 5 sterically inhibits the formation of a (3)MC(cis) state but promotes the population of (3)MC(trans) states which rapidly deactivate (3)MLCT states and are prone to mediating ground-state recovery. On the other hand, increased photochemical reactivity in 4 and 6 seems to stem from the accessibility of (3)MC(cis) states. The data provide important insights into the excited-state mechanism of photochemical ligand release by Ru(II) tris-bidentate complexes. American Chemical Society 2022-11-30 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9749030/ /pubmed/36450138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03146 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Eastham, Katie Scattergood, Paul A. Chu, Danny Boota, Rayhaan Z. Soupart, Adrien Alary, Fabienne Dixon, Isabelle M. Rice, Craig R. Hardman, Samantha J. O. Elliott, Paul I. P. Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes |
title | Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role
of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes |
title_full | Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role
of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes |
title_fullStr | Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role
of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes |
title_full_unstemmed | Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role
of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes |
title_short | Not All (3)MC States Are the Same: The Role
of (3)MC(cis) States in the Photochemical N(∧)N Ligand Release from [Ru(bpy)(2)(N(∧)N)](2+) Complexes |
title_sort | not all (3)mc states are the same: the role
of (3)mc(cis) states in the photochemical n(∧)n ligand release from [ru(bpy)(2)(n(∧)n)](2+) complexes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36450138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT easthamkatie notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes AT scattergoodpaula notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes AT chudanny notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes AT bootarayhaanz notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes AT soupartadrien notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes AT alaryfabienne notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes AT dixonisabellem notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes AT ricecraigr notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes AT hardmansamanthajo notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes AT elliottpaulip notall3mcstatesarethesametheroleof3mccisstatesinthephotochemicalnnligandreleasefromrubpy2nn2complexes |