Cargando…

Factors influencing implementation of food and food-related waste audits in hospital foodservices

BACKGROUND: Designing a food waste audit tool for novel hospital foodservice practice does not guarantee uptake. Intended users must be consulted to understand the tool’s feasibility and face validity. This study aimed to identify the perspectives of staff involved in the operation of hospital foods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cook, Nathan, Collins, Jorja, Goodwin, Denise, Porter, Judi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532534
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1062619
_version_ 1784851077776015360
author Cook, Nathan
Collins, Jorja
Goodwin, Denise
Porter, Judi
author_facet Cook, Nathan
Collins, Jorja
Goodwin, Denise
Porter, Judi
author_sort Cook, Nathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Designing a food waste audit tool for novel hospital foodservice practice does not guarantee uptake. Intended users must be consulted to understand the tool’s feasibility and face validity. This study aimed to identify the perspectives of staff involved in the operation of hospital foodservices on (1) how an evidenced based consensus pathway food waste audit tool is perceived to translate into practice, and (2) to determine the factors that influence the completion of food and food-related waste audits within this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Purposeful sampling was used to recruit staff with knowledge on the operation/governance of foodservices within hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Semi-structured interviews (n = 20) were conducted via Zoom to explore barriers and enablers to completing food and food-related waste audits and a previously published food waste audit tool. NVivo was used for inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three factors determined the completion of food and food-related waste audits in hospital foodservices, and each factor could be a barrier or an enabler; (1) capacity: the availability of time, labour and materials to complete an audit (2) change: staff resistance to audit procedures and how to gain their buy-in (3) processes, governance, and leadership: the opportunity for high level support, policy and structure to encourage waste audits if present. The consensus tool appeared to have face validity. Planning audit operations, conducting stakeholder meetings, providing education/training to foodservice team members, and facilitating communication between managers and staff were described to support consensus tool use and audit completion. CONCLUSION: The consensus tool can be used to support hospital foodservices to complete food and food-related waste audits, although it may need to be customised to be fit for purpose. Optimising the capacity, change management and processes, governance and leadership of the foodservice department may improve the experience and success of a food and food-related waste audit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9753938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97539382022-12-16 Factors influencing implementation of food and food-related waste audits in hospital foodservices Cook, Nathan Collins, Jorja Goodwin, Denise Porter, Judi Front Nutr Nutrition BACKGROUND: Designing a food waste audit tool for novel hospital foodservice practice does not guarantee uptake. Intended users must be consulted to understand the tool’s feasibility and face validity. This study aimed to identify the perspectives of staff involved in the operation of hospital foodservices on (1) how an evidenced based consensus pathway food waste audit tool is perceived to translate into practice, and (2) to determine the factors that influence the completion of food and food-related waste audits within this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Purposeful sampling was used to recruit staff with knowledge on the operation/governance of foodservices within hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Semi-structured interviews (n = 20) were conducted via Zoom to explore barriers and enablers to completing food and food-related waste audits and a previously published food waste audit tool. NVivo was used for inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three factors determined the completion of food and food-related waste audits in hospital foodservices, and each factor could be a barrier or an enabler; (1) capacity: the availability of time, labour and materials to complete an audit (2) change: staff resistance to audit procedures and how to gain their buy-in (3) processes, governance, and leadership: the opportunity for high level support, policy and structure to encourage waste audits if present. The consensus tool appeared to have face validity. Planning audit operations, conducting stakeholder meetings, providing education/training to foodservice team members, and facilitating communication between managers and staff were described to support consensus tool use and audit completion. CONCLUSION: The consensus tool can be used to support hospital foodservices to complete food and food-related waste audits, although it may need to be customised to be fit for purpose. Optimising the capacity, change management and processes, governance and leadership of the foodservice department may improve the experience and success of a food and food-related waste audit. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9753938/ /pubmed/36532534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1062619 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cook, Collins, Goodwin and Porter. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Cook, Nathan
Collins, Jorja
Goodwin, Denise
Porter, Judi
Factors influencing implementation of food and food-related waste audits in hospital foodservices
title Factors influencing implementation of food and food-related waste audits in hospital foodservices
title_full Factors influencing implementation of food and food-related waste audits in hospital foodservices
title_fullStr Factors influencing implementation of food and food-related waste audits in hospital foodservices
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing implementation of food and food-related waste audits in hospital foodservices
title_short Factors influencing implementation of food and food-related waste audits in hospital foodservices
title_sort factors influencing implementation of food and food-related waste audits in hospital foodservices
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532534
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1062619
work_keys_str_mv AT cooknathan factorsinfluencingimplementationoffoodandfoodrelatedwasteauditsinhospitalfoodservices
AT collinsjorja factorsinfluencingimplementationoffoodandfoodrelatedwasteauditsinhospitalfoodservices
AT goodwindenise factorsinfluencingimplementationoffoodandfoodrelatedwasteauditsinhospitalfoodservices
AT porterjudi factorsinfluencingimplementationoffoodandfoodrelatedwasteauditsinhospitalfoodservices