Cargando…

A Systematic Approach to Provide Feedback to Presenters at Virtual and Face-to-Face Professional Meetings

INTRODUCTION: To promote their personal and professional growth, medical educators need practical, actionable feedback on their scholarship, as well as guidance for documenting their scholarship in educator portfolios. We offer a framework and resources to provide formative and summative feedback to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bierer, S. Beth, Cianciolo, Anna, Han, Heeyoung, Hanson, Janice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association of American Medical Colleges 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605543
http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11288
_version_ 1784851418592575488
author Bierer, S. Beth
Cianciolo, Anna
Han, Heeyoung
Hanson, Janice
author_facet Bierer, S. Beth
Cianciolo, Anna
Han, Heeyoung
Hanson, Janice
author_sort Bierer, S. Beth
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To promote their personal and professional growth, medical educators need practical, actionable feedback on their scholarship, as well as guidance for documenting their scholarship in educator portfolios. We offer a framework and resources to provide formative and summative feedback to faculty, administrators, and/or learners delivering an oral presentation at a face-to-face or virtual health professions education meeting. METHODS: In 2014, the leadership of the Central Group on Educational Affairs (CGEA) meeting planning committee developed and piloted a process to provide individuals with formative and summative feedback on their oral CGEA research presentations at face-to-face meetings and create a transparent process for determining the Best Presentation Award. The feedback process was implemented for 7 years until revised in 2021 for the CGEA's first virtual meeting. Past and present meeting organizers conducted four focus groups in 2021 with presenters and peer reviewers via Zoom. Transcripts were analyzed for major themes using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: To date, 102 presentation assessments have been conducted, including formative and summative assessments. Sixty-two volunteer assessors have participated, 19 (31%) of whom served for more than 2 years. Focus groups identified best practices and suggestions to improve the feedback process. DISCUSSION: This resource offers a feasible, systematic process to provide individuals with formative feedback on presentations at professional conferences, promote a community of practice for personal and professional development, and create a transparent process for determining a Best Presentation Award. Participants valued providing and receiving feedback and recommended implementation at other professional meetings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9755373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Association of American Medical Colleges
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97553732023-01-04 A Systematic Approach to Provide Feedback to Presenters at Virtual and Face-to-Face Professional Meetings Bierer, S. Beth Cianciolo, Anna Han, Heeyoung Hanson, Janice MedEdPORTAL Original Publication INTRODUCTION: To promote their personal and professional growth, medical educators need practical, actionable feedback on their scholarship, as well as guidance for documenting their scholarship in educator portfolios. We offer a framework and resources to provide formative and summative feedback to faculty, administrators, and/or learners delivering an oral presentation at a face-to-face or virtual health professions education meeting. METHODS: In 2014, the leadership of the Central Group on Educational Affairs (CGEA) meeting planning committee developed and piloted a process to provide individuals with formative and summative feedback on their oral CGEA research presentations at face-to-face meetings and create a transparent process for determining the Best Presentation Award. The feedback process was implemented for 7 years until revised in 2021 for the CGEA's first virtual meeting. Past and present meeting organizers conducted four focus groups in 2021 with presenters and peer reviewers via Zoom. Transcripts were analyzed for major themes using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: To date, 102 presentation assessments have been conducted, including formative and summative assessments. Sixty-two volunteer assessors have participated, 19 (31%) of whom served for more than 2 years. Focus groups identified best practices and suggestions to improve the feedback process. DISCUSSION: This resource offers a feasible, systematic process to provide individuals with formative feedback on presentations at professional conferences, promote a community of practice for personal and professional development, and create a transparent process for determining a Best Presentation Award. Participants valued providing and receiving feedback and recommended implementation at other professional meetings. Association of American Medical Colleges 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9755373/ /pubmed/36605543 http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11288 Text en © 2022 Bierer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) license.
spellingShingle Original Publication
Bierer, S. Beth
Cianciolo, Anna
Han, Heeyoung
Hanson, Janice
A Systematic Approach to Provide Feedback to Presenters at Virtual and Face-to-Face Professional Meetings
title A Systematic Approach to Provide Feedback to Presenters at Virtual and Face-to-Face Professional Meetings
title_full A Systematic Approach to Provide Feedback to Presenters at Virtual and Face-to-Face Professional Meetings
title_fullStr A Systematic Approach to Provide Feedback to Presenters at Virtual and Face-to-Face Professional Meetings
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Approach to Provide Feedback to Presenters at Virtual and Face-to-Face Professional Meetings
title_short A Systematic Approach to Provide Feedback to Presenters at Virtual and Face-to-Face Professional Meetings
title_sort systematic approach to provide feedback to presenters at virtual and face-to-face professional meetings
topic Original Publication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605543
http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11288
work_keys_str_mv AT bierersbeth asystematicapproachtoprovidefeedbacktopresentersatvirtualandfacetofaceprofessionalmeetings
AT ciancioloanna asystematicapproachtoprovidefeedbacktopresentersatvirtualandfacetofaceprofessionalmeetings
AT hanheeyoung asystematicapproachtoprovidefeedbacktopresentersatvirtualandfacetofaceprofessionalmeetings
AT hansonjanice asystematicapproachtoprovidefeedbacktopresentersatvirtualandfacetofaceprofessionalmeetings
AT bierersbeth systematicapproachtoprovidefeedbacktopresentersatvirtualandfacetofaceprofessionalmeetings
AT ciancioloanna systematicapproachtoprovidefeedbacktopresentersatvirtualandfacetofaceprofessionalmeetings
AT hanheeyoung systematicapproachtoprovidefeedbacktopresentersatvirtualandfacetofaceprofessionalmeetings
AT hansonjanice systematicapproachtoprovidefeedbacktopresentersatvirtualandfacetofaceprofessionalmeetings