Cargando…

First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses

BACKGROUND: Digital teaching and learning tools, such as computer/mobile apps, are becoming an important factor in modern university education. The objective of our study was to introduce, analyze, and assess an organization and dual assessment app for clinical courses in dental medicine. METHODS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goob, Janosch, Possert, Philipp, Klören, Markus, Erdelt, Kurt, Güth, Jan-Frederik, Edelhoff, Daniel, Liebermann, Anja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03945-z
_version_ 1784851499187175424
author Goob, Janosch
Possert, Philipp
Klören, Markus
Erdelt, Kurt
Güth, Jan-Frederik
Edelhoff, Daniel
Liebermann, Anja
author_facet Goob, Janosch
Possert, Philipp
Klören, Markus
Erdelt, Kurt
Güth, Jan-Frederik
Edelhoff, Daniel
Liebermann, Anja
author_sort Goob, Janosch
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital teaching and learning tools, such as computer/mobile apps, are becoming an important factor in modern university education. The objective of our study was to introduce, analyze, and assess an organization and dual assessment app for clinical courses in dental medicine. METHODS: This was a survey-based study of dental students from the clinical study phase (4th/5th year; 8th/10th semester) of a department of prosthetic dentistry at a German university hospital about the benefits of a novel web-based and mobile app for organization and dual assessment of dental clinical courses. A total of eight questions were answered in an anonymous online survey. Data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, followed by an exploratory data analysis (α < 0.05). RESULTS: The app was given an average grade of 2.4, whereby 56.9% of the respondents rated the app with a grade of 2 (2 = good). In all, 94.6% of the study participants had not experienced any technical problems when using the app. Concerning the assessment, teaching doctor assessment (51.5 [IQR: 44.0]) was rated significantly better (p = 0.002) than self-assessment (39.5 [IQR: 32.8]). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation evaluated a newly introduced app to optimize dental clinical course workflows and assessment. The organizational feature was rated as good, while the daily self- and teaching doctor assessments were evaluated as less important. The results outline how the use of app technologies can provide an infrastructure for managing organization and daily assessments in dental education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9755800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97558002022-12-16 First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses Goob, Janosch Possert, Philipp Klören, Markus Erdelt, Kurt Güth, Jan-Frederik Edelhoff, Daniel Liebermann, Anja BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Digital teaching and learning tools, such as computer/mobile apps, are becoming an important factor in modern university education. The objective of our study was to introduce, analyze, and assess an organization and dual assessment app for clinical courses in dental medicine. METHODS: This was a survey-based study of dental students from the clinical study phase (4th/5th year; 8th/10th semester) of a department of prosthetic dentistry at a German university hospital about the benefits of a novel web-based and mobile app for organization and dual assessment of dental clinical courses. A total of eight questions were answered in an anonymous online survey. Data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, followed by an exploratory data analysis (α < 0.05). RESULTS: The app was given an average grade of 2.4, whereby 56.9% of the respondents rated the app with a grade of 2 (2 = good). In all, 94.6% of the study participants had not experienced any technical problems when using the app. Concerning the assessment, teaching doctor assessment (51.5 [IQR: 44.0]) was rated significantly better (p = 0.002) than self-assessment (39.5 [IQR: 32.8]). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation evaluated a newly introduced app to optimize dental clinical course workflows and assessment. The organizational feature was rated as good, while the daily self- and teaching doctor assessments were evaluated as less important. The results outline how the use of app technologies can provide an infrastructure for managing organization and daily assessments in dental education. BioMed Central 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9755800/ /pubmed/36527078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03945-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Goob, Janosch
Possert, Philipp
Klören, Markus
Erdelt, Kurt
Güth, Jan-Frederik
Edelhoff, Daniel
Liebermann, Anja
First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses
title First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses
title_full First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses
title_fullStr First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses
title_full_unstemmed First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses
title_short First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses
title_sort first evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03945-z
work_keys_str_mv AT goobjanosch firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses
AT possertphilipp firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses
AT klorenmarkus firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses
AT erdeltkurt firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses
AT guthjanfrederik firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses
AT edelhoffdaniel firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses
AT liebermannanja firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses