Cargando…
First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses
BACKGROUND: Digital teaching and learning tools, such as computer/mobile apps, are becoming an important factor in modern university education. The objective of our study was to introduce, analyze, and assess an organization and dual assessment app for clinical courses in dental medicine. METHODS: T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03945-z |
_version_ | 1784851499187175424 |
---|---|
author | Goob, Janosch Possert, Philipp Klören, Markus Erdelt, Kurt Güth, Jan-Frederik Edelhoff, Daniel Liebermann, Anja |
author_facet | Goob, Janosch Possert, Philipp Klören, Markus Erdelt, Kurt Güth, Jan-Frederik Edelhoff, Daniel Liebermann, Anja |
author_sort | Goob, Janosch |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Digital teaching and learning tools, such as computer/mobile apps, are becoming an important factor in modern university education. The objective of our study was to introduce, analyze, and assess an organization and dual assessment app for clinical courses in dental medicine. METHODS: This was a survey-based study of dental students from the clinical study phase (4th/5th year; 8th/10th semester) of a department of prosthetic dentistry at a German university hospital about the benefits of a novel web-based and mobile app for organization and dual assessment of dental clinical courses. A total of eight questions were answered in an anonymous online survey. Data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, followed by an exploratory data analysis (α < 0.05). RESULTS: The app was given an average grade of 2.4, whereby 56.9% of the respondents rated the app with a grade of 2 (2 = good). In all, 94.6% of the study participants had not experienced any technical problems when using the app. Concerning the assessment, teaching doctor assessment (51.5 [IQR: 44.0]) was rated significantly better (p = 0.002) than self-assessment (39.5 [IQR: 32.8]). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation evaluated a newly introduced app to optimize dental clinical course workflows and assessment. The organizational feature was rated as good, while the daily self- and teaching doctor assessments were evaluated as less important. The results outline how the use of app technologies can provide an infrastructure for managing organization and daily assessments in dental education. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9755800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97558002022-12-16 First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses Goob, Janosch Possert, Philipp Klören, Markus Erdelt, Kurt Güth, Jan-Frederik Edelhoff, Daniel Liebermann, Anja BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Digital teaching and learning tools, such as computer/mobile apps, are becoming an important factor in modern university education. The objective of our study was to introduce, analyze, and assess an organization and dual assessment app for clinical courses in dental medicine. METHODS: This was a survey-based study of dental students from the clinical study phase (4th/5th year; 8th/10th semester) of a department of prosthetic dentistry at a German university hospital about the benefits of a novel web-based and mobile app for organization and dual assessment of dental clinical courses. A total of eight questions were answered in an anonymous online survey. Data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, followed by an exploratory data analysis (α < 0.05). RESULTS: The app was given an average grade of 2.4, whereby 56.9% of the respondents rated the app with a grade of 2 (2 = good). In all, 94.6% of the study participants had not experienced any technical problems when using the app. Concerning the assessment, teaching doctor assessment (51.5 [IQR: 44.0]) was rated significantly better (p = 0.002) than self-assessment (39.5 [IQR: 32.8]). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation evaluated a newly introduced app to optimize dental clinical course workflows and assessment. The organizational feature was rated as good, while the daily self- and teaching doctor assessments were evaluated as less important. The results outline how the use of app technologies can provide an infrastructure for managing organization and daily assessments in dental education. BioMed Central 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9755800/ /pubmed/36527078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03945-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Goob, Janosch Possert, Philipp Klören, Markus Erdelt, Kurt Güth, Jan-Frederik Edelhoff, Daniel Liebermann, Anja First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses |
title | First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses |
title_full | First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses |
title_fullStr | First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses |
title_full_unstemmed | First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses |
title_short | First evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses |
title_sort | first evaluation of an app to optimize and organize the processes and assessments in dental clinical courses |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03945-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goobjanosch firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses AT possertphilipp firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses AT klorenmarkus firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses AT erdeltkurt firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses AT guthjanfrederik firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses AT edelhoffdaniel firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses AT liebermannanja firstevaluationofanapptooptimizeandorganizetheprocessesandassessmentsindentalclinicalcourses |