Cargando…

A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected face-to-face teaching across the globe. The sudden shift in learning methods has impacted learning experiences significantly. Students' perception about online compared to blended learning might affect learning. The objective of this study was to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swaminathan, Narasimman, Ravichandran, Latha, Ramachandran, Sivakumar, Milanese, Steve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568017
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1801_21
_version_ 1784854238452514816
author Swaminathan, Narasimman
Ravichandran, Latha
Ramachandran, Sivakumar
Milanese, Steve
author_facet Swaminathan, Narasimman
Ravichandran, Latha
Ramachandran, Sivakumar
Milanese, Steve
author_sort Swaminathan, Narasimman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected face-to-face teaching across the globe. The sudden shift in learning methods has impacted learning experiences significantly. Students' perception about online compared to blended learning might affect learning. The objective of this study was to evaluate physiotherapy students' perception of blended compared to online learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This mixed-method study documents physiotherapy students' perception about the courses delivered through blended learning (BL) mode during the COVID-19 pandemic. Physiotherapy graduates and postgraduate students who completed their evidence-based physiotherapy practice courses at Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai (N = 68) participated in this study. The participants' perceived experience about synchronous online mode and BL during the pandemic was assessed using a questionnaire and focus group discussion. RESULTS: All the participants felt that the course outcomes were met and that they gained knowledge and skills in evidence-based practice. Most of the students (93%) recommended a blended mode of learning compared to online learning alone. Thematic analysis of the focus group discussion (FGD) identified enhanced learning experience, collaborative learning as enablers to BL, and availability of gadgets and quality of online contents as barriers. CONCLUSION: Participants showed par preference for blended learning over online learning as it provided flexibility and facilitated active learning compared to online learning alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9768744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97687442022-12-22 A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study Swaminathan, Narasimman Ravichandran, Latha Ramachandran, Sivakumar Milanese, Steve J Educ Health Promot Original Article BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected face-to-face teaching across the globe. The sudden shift in learning methods has impacted learning experiences significantly. Students' perception about online compared to blended learning might affect learning. The objective of this study was to evaluate physiotherapy students' perception of blended compared to online learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This mixed-method study documents physiotherapy students' perception about the courses delivered through blended learning (BL) mode during the COVID-19 pandemic. Physiotherapy graduates and postgraduate students who completed their evidence-based physiotherapy practice courses at Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai (N = 68) participated in this study. The participants' perceived experience about synchronous online mode and BL during the pandemic was assessed using a questionnaire and focus group discussion. RESULTS: All the participants felt that the course outcomes were met and that they gained knowledge and skills in evidence-based practice. Most of the students (93%) recommended a blended mode of learning compared to online learning alone. Thematic analysis of the focus group discussion (FGD) identified enhanced learning experience, collaborative learning as enablers to BL, and availability of gadgets and quality of online contents as barriers. CONCLUSION: Participants showed par preference for blended learning over online learning as it provided flexibility and facilitated active learning compared to online learning alone. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9768744/ /pubmed/36568017 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1801_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Education and Health Promotion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Swaminathan, Narasimman
Ravichandran, Latha
Ramachandran, Sivakumar
Milanese, Steve
A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study
title A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study
title_full A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study
title_fullStr A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study
title_short A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study
title_sort comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during covid-19 pandemic: a mixed method of study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568017
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1801_21
work_keys_str_mv AT swaminathannarasimman acomparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy
AT ravichandranlatha acomparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy
AT ramachandransivakumar acomparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy
AT milanesesteve acomparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy
AT swaminathannarasimman comparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy
AT ravichandranlatha comparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy
AT ramachandransivakumar comparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy
AT milanesesteve comparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy