Cargando…
A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected face-to-face teaching across the globe. The sudden shift in learning methods has impacted learning experiences significantly. Students' perception about online compared to blended learning might affect learning. The objective of this study was to e...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568017 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1801_21 |
_version_ | 1784854238452514816 |
---|---|
author | Swaminathan, Narasimman Ravichandran, Latha Ramachandran, Sivakumar Milanese, Steve |
author_facet | Swaminathan, Narasimman Ravichandran, Latha Ramachandran, Sivakumar Milanese, Steve |
author_sort | Swaminathan, Narasimman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected face-to-face teaching across the globe. The sudden shift in learning methods has impacted learning experiences significantly. Students' perception about online compared to blended learning might affect learning. The objective of this study was to evaluate physiotherapy students' perception of blended compared to online learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This mixed-method study documents physiotherapy students' perception about the courses delivered through blended learning (BL) mode during the COVID-19 pandemic. Physiotherapy graduates and postgraduate students who completed their evidence-based physiotherapy practice courses at Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai (N = 68) participated in this study. The participants' perceived experience about synchronous online mode and BL during the pandemic was assessed using a questionnaire and focus group discussion. RESULTS: All the participants felt that the course outcomes were met and that they gained knowledge and skills in evidence-based practice. Most of the students (93%) recommended a blended mode of learning compared to online learning alone. Thematic analysis of the focus group discussion (FGD) identified enhanced learning experience, collaborative learning as enablers to BL, and availability of gadgets and quality of online contents as barriers. CONCLUSION: Participants showed par preference for blended learning over online learning as it provided flexibility and facilitated active learning compared to online learning alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9768744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97687442022-12-22 A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study Swaminathan, Narasimman Ravichandran, Latha Ramachandran, Sivakumar Milanese, Steve J Educ Health Promot Original Article BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected face-to-face teaching across the globe. The sudden shift in learning methods has impacted learning experiences significantly. Students' perception about online compared to blended learning might affect learning. The objective of this study was to evaluate physiotherapy students' perception of blended compared to online learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This mixed-method study documents physiotherapy students' perception about the courses delivered through blended learning (BL) mode during the COVID-19 pandemic. Physiotherapy graduates and postgraduate students who completed their evidence-based physiotherapy practice courses at Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai (N = 68) participated in this study. The participants' perceived experience about synchronous online mode and BL during the pandemic was assessed using a questionnaire and focus group discussion. RESULTS: All the participants felt that the course outcomes were met and that they gained knowledge and skills in evidence-based practice. Most of the students (93%) recommended a blended mode of learning compared to online learning alone. Thematic analysis of the focus group discussion (FGD) identified enhanced learning experience, collaborative learning as enablers to BL, and availability of gadgets and quality of online contents as barriers. CONCLUSION: Participants showed par preference for blended learning over online learning as it provided flexibility and facilitated active learning compared to online learning alone. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9768744/ /pubmed/36568017 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1801_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Education and Health Promotion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Swaminathan, Narasimman Ravichandran, Latha Ramachandran, Sivakumar Milanese, Steve A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study |
title | A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study |
title_full | A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study |
title_fullStr | A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study |
title_short | A comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method of study |
title_sort | comparison of physiotherapy students’ perception about blended learning with online learning during covid-19 pandemic: a mixed method of study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568017 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1801_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swaminathannarasimman acomparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy AT ravichandranlatha acomparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy AT ramachandransivakumar acomparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy AT milanesesteve acomparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy AT swaminathannarasimman comparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy AT ravichandranlatha comparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy AT ramachandransivakumar comparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy AT milanesesteve comparisonofphysiotherapystudentsperceptionaboutblendedlearningwithonlinelearningduringcovid19pandemicamixedmethodofstudy |