Cargando…

Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review

The COVID-19 pandemic presented new barriers and exacerbated existing inequities for physician scholars. While COVID-19’s impact on academic productivity among women has received attention, the pandemic may have posed additional challenges for scholars from a wider range of equity-deserving groups,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soklaridis, Sophie, Black, Georgia, LeBlanc, Constance, MacKinnon, Kinnon R., Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna, Clement, Fiona, Schrewe, Brett, Ross, Heather J., Calleja, Sabine, Stergiopoulos, Vicky, Taylor, Valerie H., Kuper, Ayelet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36576772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004971
_version_ 1784856743848706048
author Soklaridis, Sophie
Black, Georgia
LeBlanc, Constance
MacKinnon, Kinnon R.
Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
Clement, Fiona
Schrewe, Brett
Ross, Heather J.
Calleja, Sabine
Stergiopoulos, Vicky
Taylor, Valerie H.
Kuper, Ayelet
author_facet Soklaridis, Sophie
Black, Georgia
LeBlanc, Constance
MacKinnon, Kinnon R.
Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
Clement, Fiona
Schrewe, Brett
Ross, Heather J.
Calleja, Sabine
Stergiopoulos, Vicky
Taylor, Valerie H.
Kuper, Ayelet
author_sort Soklaridis, Sophie
collection PubMed
description The COVID-19 pandemic presented new barriers and exacerbated existing inequities for physician scholars. While COVID-19’s impact on academic productivity among women has received attention, the pandemic may have posed additional challenges for scholars from a wider range of equity-deserving groups, including those who hold multiple equity-deserving identities. To examine this concern, the authors conducted a scoping review of the literature through an intersectionality lens. METHOD: The authors searched peer-reviewed literature published March 1, 2020, to December 16, 2021, in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and PubMed. The authors excluded studies not written in English and/or outside of academic medicine. From included studies, they extracted data regarding descriptions of how COVID-19 impacted academic productivity of equity-deserving physician scholars, analyses on the pandemic’s reported impact on productivity of physician scholars from equity-deserving groups, and strategies provided to reduce the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on academic productivity of physician scholars from equity-deserving groups. RESULTS: Of 11,587 unique articles, 44 met inclusion criteria, including 15 nonempirical studies and 29 empirical studies (22 bibliometrics studies, 6 surveys, and 1 qualitative study). All included articles focused on the gendered impact of the pandemic on academic productivity. The majority of their recommendations focused on how to alleviate the burden of the pandemic on women, particularly those in the early stages of their career and/or with children, without consideration of scholars who hold multiple and intersecting identities from a wider range of equity-deserving groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate a lack of published literature on the pandemic’s impact on physician scholars from equity-deserving groups, including a lack of consideration of physician scholars who experience multiple forms of discrimination. Well-intentioned measures by academic institutions to reduce the impact on scholars may inadvertently risk reproducing and sustaining inequities that equity-deserving scholars faced during the pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9779983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97799832022-12-23 Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review Soklaridis, Sophie Black, Georgia LeBlanc, Constance MacKinnon, Kinnon R. Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna Clement, Fiona Schrewe, Brett Ross, Heather J. Calleja, Sabine Stergiopoulos, Vicky Taylor, Valerie H. Kuper, Ayelet Acad Med Reviews The COVID-19 pandemic presented new barriers and exacerbated existing inequities for physician scholars. While COVID-19’s impact on academic productivity among women has received attention, the pandemic may have posed additional challenges for scholars from a wider range of equity-deserving groups, including those who hold multiple equity-deserving identities. To examine this concern, the authors conducted a scoping review of the literature through an intersectionality lens. METHOD: The authors searched peer-reviewed literature published March 1, 2020, to December 16, 2021, in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and PubMed. The authors excluded studies not written in English and/or outside of academic medicine. From included studies, they extracted data regarding descriptions of how COVID-19 impacted academic productivity of equity-deserving physician scholars, analyses on the pandemic’s reported impact on productivity of physician scholars from equity-deserving groups, and strategies provided to reduce the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on academic productivity of physician scholars from equity-deserving groups. RESULTS: Of 11,587 unique articles, 44 met inclusion criteria, including 15 nonempirical studies and 29 empirical studies (22 bibliometrics studies, 6 surveys, and 1 qualitative study). All included articles focused on the gendered impact of the pandemic on academic productivity. The majority of their recommendations focused on how to alleviate the burden of the pandemic on women, particularly those in the early stages of their career and/or with children, without consideration of scholars who hold multiple and intersecting identities from a wider range of equity-deserving groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate a lack of published literature on the pandemic’s impact on physician scholars from equity-deserving groups, including a lack of consideration of physician scholars who experience multiple forms of discrimination. Well-intentioned measures by academic institutions to reduce the impact on scholars may inadvertently risk reproducing and sustaining inequities that equity-deserving scholars faced during the pandemic. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09-20 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9779983/ /pubmed/36576772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004971 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of American Medical Colleges. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Reviews
Soklaridis, Sophie
Black, Georgia
LeBlanc, Constance
MacKinnon, Kinnon R.
Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
Clement, Fiona
Schrewe, Brett
Ross, Heather J.
Calleja, Sabine
Stergiopoulos, Vicky
Taylor, Valerie H.
Kuper, Ayelet
Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review
title Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review
title_full Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review
title_short Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review
title_sort academic productivity of equity-deserving physician scholars during covid-19: a scoping review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36576772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004971
work_keys_str_mv AT soklaridissophie academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview
AT blackgeorgia academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview
AT leblancconstance academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview
AT mackinnonkinnonr academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview
AT holroydleducjayna academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview
AT clementfiona academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview
AT schrewebrett academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview
AT rossheatherj academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview
AT callejasabine academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview
AT stergiopoulosvicky academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview
AT taylorvalerieh academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview
AT kuperayelet academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview