Cargando…
Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review
The COVID-19 pandemic presented new barriers and exacerbated existing inequities for physician scholars. While COVID-19’s impact on academic productivity among women has received attention, the pandemic may have posed additional challenges for scholars from a wider range of equity-deserving groups,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36576772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004971 |
_version_ | 1784856743848706048 |
---|---|
author | Soklaridis, Sophie Black, Georgia LeBlanc, Constance MacKinnon, Kinnon R. Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna Clement, Fiona Schrewe, Brett Ross, Heather J. Calleja, Sabine Stergiopoulos, Vicky Taylor, Valerie H. Kuper, Ayelet |
author_facet | Soklaridis, Sophie Black, Georgia LeBlanc, Constance MacKinnon, Kinnon R. Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna Clement, Fiona Schrewe, Brett Ross, Heather J. Calleja, Sabine Stergiopoulos, Vicky Taylor, Valerie H. Kuper, Ayelet |
author_sort | Soklaridis, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic presented new barriers and exacerbated existing inequities for physician scholars. While COVID-19’s impact on academic productivity among women has received attention, the pandemic may have posed additional challenges for scholars from a wider range of equity-deserving groups, including those who hold multiple equity-deserving identities. To examine this concern, the authors conducted a scoping review of the literature through an intersectionality lens. METHOD: The authors searched peer-reviewed literature published March 1, 2020, to December 16, 2021, in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and PubMed. The authors excluded studies not written in English and/or outside of academic medicine. From included studies, they extracted data regarding descriptions of how COVID-19 impacted academic productivity of equity-deserving physician scholars, analyses on the pandemic’s reported impact on productivity of physician scholars from equity-deserving groups, and strategies provided to reduce the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on academic productivity of physician scholars from equity-deserving groups. RESULTS: Of 11,587 unique articles, 44 met inclusion criteria, including 15 nonempirical studies and 29 empirical studies (22 bibliometrics studies, 6 surveys, and 1 qualitative study). All included articles focused on the gendered impact of the pandemic on academic productivity. The majority of their recommendations focused on how to alleviate the burden of the pandemic on women, particularly those in the early stages of their career and/or with children, without consideration of scholars who hold multiple and intersecting identities from a wider range of equity-deserving groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate a lack of published literature on the pandemic’s impact on physician scholars from equity-deserving groups, including a lack of consideration of physician scholars who experience multiple forms of discrimination. Well-intentioned measures by academic institutions to reduce the impact on scholars may inadvertently risk reproducing and sustaining inequities that equity-deserving scholars faced during the pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9779983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97799832022-12-23 Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review Soklaridis, Sophie Black, Georgia LeBlanc, Constance MacKinnon, Kinnon R. Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna Clement, Fiona Schrewe, Brett Ross, Heather J. Calleja, Sabine Stergiopoulos, Vicky Taylor, Valerie H. Kuper, Ayelet Acad Med Reviews The COVID-19 pandemic presented new barriers and exacerbated existing inequities for physician scholars. While COVID-19’s impact on academic productivity among women has received attention, the pandemic may have posed additional challenges for scholars from a wider range of equity-deserving groups, including those who hold multiple equity-deserving identities. To examine this concern, the authors conducted a scoping review of the literature through an intersectionality lens. METHOD: The authors searched peer-reviewed literature published March 1, 2020, to December 16, 2021, in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and PubMed. The authors excluded studies not written in English and/or outside of academic medicine. From included studies, they extracted data regarding descriptions of how COVID-19 impacted academic productivity of equity-deserving physician scholars, analyses on the pandemic’s reported impact on productivity of physician scholars from equity-deserving groups, and strategies provided to reduce the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on academic productivity of physician scholars from equity-deserving groups. RESULTS: Of 11,587 unique articles, 44 met inclusion criteria, including 15 nonempirical studies and 29 empirical studies (22 bibliometrics studies, 6 surveys, and 1 qualitative study). All included articles focused on the gendered impact of the pandemic on academic productivity. The majority of their recommendations focused on how to alleviate the burden of the pandemic on women, particularly those in the early stages of their career and/or with children, without consideration of scholars who hold multiple and intersecting identities from a wider range of equity-deserving groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate a lack of published literature on the pandemic’s impact on physician scholars from equity-deserving groups, including a lack of consideration of physician scholars who experience multiple forms of discrimination. Well-intentioned measures by academic institutions to reduce the impact on scholars may inadvertently risk reproducing and sustaining inequities that equity-deserving scholars faced during the pandemic. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09-20 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9779983/ /pubmed/36576772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004971 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of American Medical Colleges. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Soklaridis, Sophie Black, Georgia LeBlanc, Constance MacKinnon, Kinnon R. Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna Clement, Fiona Schrewe, Brett Ross, Heather J. Calleja, Sabine Stergiopoulos, Vicky Taylor, Valerie H. Kuper, Ayelet Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review |
title | Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | academic productivity of equity-deserving physician scholars during covid-19: a scoping review |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36576772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004971 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soklaridissophie academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview AT blackgeorgia academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview AT leblancconstance academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview AT mackinnonkinnonr academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview AT holroydleducjayna academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview AT clementfiona academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview AT schrewebrett academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview AT rossheatherj academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview AT callejasabine academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview AT stergiopoulosvicky academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview AT taylorvalerieh academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview AT kuperayelet academicproductivityofequitydeservingphysicianscholarsduringcovid19ascopingreview |