Cargando…

Structural Optimization and Mechanical Simulation of MEMS Thin-Film Getter–Heater Unit

A MEMS thin-film getter–heater unit has been previously proposed for the vacuum packaging of a Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) device, where the floating structure (FS) design is found to be obviously more power-efficient than the solid structure (SS) one by heat transfer capacity simulation....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Xinlin, Ji, Yucheng, Chen, Shuo, Guo, Song, Feng, Liuhaodong, Xu, Yang, Wang, Shinan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36557551
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13122252
_version_ 1784858710377496576
author Peng, Xinlin
Ji, Yucheng
Chen, Shuo
Guo, Song
Feng, Liuhaodong
Xu, Yang
Wang, Shinan
author_facet Peng, Xinlin
Ji, Yucheng
Chen, Shuo
Guo, Song
Feng, Liuhaodong
Xu, Yang
Wang, Shinan
author_sort Peng, Xinlin
collection PubMed
description A MEMS thin-film getter–heater unit has been previously proposed for the vacuum packaging of a Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) device, where the floating structure (FS) design is found to be obviously more power-efficient than the solid structure (SS) one by heat transfer capacity simulation. However, the mechanical strength of the FS is weaker than the SS by nature. For high temperature usage, the unit structure must be optimized in order to avoid fracture of the cantilever beam or film delamination due to strong excessive stress caused by heating. In this paper, COMSOL is used to simulate the stress and deformation of the MEMS thin-film getter–heater unit with the cantilever structure. By comparing various cantilever structures, it is found that a model with a symmetrically-shaped heater and edge–center-located cantilever model (II-ECLC model) is the most suitable. In this model, even when the structure is heated to about 600 °C, the maximum stress of the cantilever beam is only 455 MPa, much lower than the tensile strength of silicon nitride (Si(3)N(4), 12 GPa), and the maximum deformation displacement is about 200 μm. Meanwhile, the interfacial stress between the getter and the insulating layer is 44 MPa, sufficiently lower than the adhesion strength between silicon nitride film and titanium film (400–1850 MPa). It is further found that both the stress of the cantilever structure and the interfacial stress between the getter and the insulating layer beneath increase linearly with temperature; and the deformation of the cantilever structure is proportional to its stress. This work gives guidance on the design of MEMS devices with cantilever structures and works in high temperature situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9788257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97882572022-12-24 Structural Optimization and Mechanical Simulation of MEMS Thin-Film Getter–Heater Unit Peng, Xinlin Ji, Yucheng Chen, Shuo Guo, Song Feng, Liuhaodong Xu, Yang Wang, Shinan Micromachines (Basel) Article A MEMS thin-film getter–heater unit has been previously proposed for the vacuum packaging of a Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) device, where the floating structure (FS) design is found to be obviously more power-efficient than the solid structure (SS) one by heat transfer capacity simulation. However, the mechanical strength of the FS is weaker than the SS by nature. For high temperature usage, the unit structure must be optimized in order to avoid fracture of the cantilever beam or film delamination due to strong excessive stress caused by heating. In this paper, COMSOL is used to simulate the stress and deformation of the MEMS thin-film getter–heater unit with the cantilever structure. By comparing various cantilever structures, it is found that a model with a symmetrically-shaped heater and edge–center-located cantilever model (II-ECLC model) is the most suitable. In this model, even when the structure is heated to about 600 °C, the maximum stress of the cantilever beam is only 455 MPa, much lower than the tensile strength of silicon nitride (Si(3)N(4), 12 GPa), and the maximum deformation displacement is about 200 μm. Meanwhile, the interfacial stress between the getter and the insulating layer is 44 MPa, sufficiently lower than the adhesion strength between silicon nitride film and titanium film (400–1850 MPa). It is further found that both the stress of the cantilever structure and the interfacial stress between the getter and the insulating layer beneath increase linearly with temperature; and the deformation of the cantilever structure is proportional to its stress. This work gives guidance on the design of MEMS devices with cantilever structures and works in high temperature situations. MDPI 2022-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9788257/ /pubmed/36557551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13122252 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Peng, Xinlin
Ji, Yucheng
Chen, Shuo
Guo, Song
Feng, Liuhaodong
Xu, Yang
Wang, Shinan
Structural Optimization and Mechanical Simulation of MEMS Thin-Film Getter–Heater Unit
title Structural Optimization and Mechanical Simulation of MEMS Thin-Film Getter–Heater Unit
title_full Structural Optimization and Mechanical Simulation of MEMS Thin-Film Getter–Heater Unit
title_fullStr Structural Optimization and Mechanical Simulation of MEMS Thin-Film Getter–Heater Unit
title_full_unstemmed Structural Optimization and Mechanical Simulation of MEMS Thin-Film Getter–Heater Unit
title_short Structural Optimization and Mechanical Simulation of MEMS Thin-Film Getter–Heater Unit
title_sort structural optimization and mechanical simulation of mems thin-film getter–heater unit
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36557551
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13122252
work_keys_str_mv AT pengxinlin structuraloptimizationandmechanicalsimulationofmemsthinfilmgetterheaterunit
AT jiyucheng structuraloptimizationandmechanicalsimulationofmemsthinfilmgetterheaterunit
AT chenshuo structuraloptimizationandmechanicalsimulationofmemsthinfilmgetterheaterunit
AT guosong structuraloptimizationandmechanicalsimulationofmemsthinfilmgetterheaterunit
AT fengliuhaodong structuraloptimizationandmechanicalsimulationofmemsthinfilmgetterheaterunit
AT xuyang structuraloptimizationandmechanicalsimulationofmemsthinfilmgetterheaterunit
AT wangshinan structuraloptimizationandmechanicalsimulationofmemsthinfilmgetterheaterunit