Valve‐in‐Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

BACKGROUND: In the absence of randomized controlled trials, reports from nonrandomized studies comparing valve‐in‐valve implantation (ViV) to redo surgical aortic valve replacement (rAVR) have shown inconsistent results. METHODS AND RESULTS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Cent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raschpichler, Matthias, de Waha, Suzanne, Holzhey, David, Schwarzer, Guido, Flint, Nir, Kaewkes, Danon, Bräuchle, Paul T., Dvir, Danny, Makkar, Raj, Ailawadi, Gorav, Abdel‐Wahab, Mohamed, Thiele, Holger, Borger, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9798815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36533610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024848

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9798815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36533610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024848

Ejemplares similares