Cargando…
Perception from students regarding online synchronous interactive teaching in the clinical year during COVID-19 pandemic
AIM: The global pandemic of COVID-19 has led to extensive practice of online learning. Our main objective is to compare different online synchronous interactive learning activities to evaluate students’ perceptions. Moreover, we also aim to identify factors influencing their perceptions in these cla...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03958-8 |
_version_ | 1784863796718731264 |
---|---|
author | Cheung, Billy H. H. Foo, Dominic C. C. Chu, Kent Man Co, Michael Lee, Lok Sze |
author_facet | Cheung, Billy H. H. Foo, Dominic C. C. Chu, Kent Man Co, Michael Lee, Lok Sze |
author_sort | Cheung, Billy H. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The global pandemic of COVID-19 has led to extensive practice of online learning. Our main objective is to compare different online synchronous interactive learning activities to evaluate students’ perceptions. Moreover, we also aim to identify factors influencing their perceptions in these classes. METHODS: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study focusing on clinical year medical students’ perceptions and feedback was conducted between February 2021 –June 2021 at the University of Hong Kong. Online learning activities were divided into bedside teaching, practical skill session, problem-based learning (PBL) or tutorial, and lecture. A questionnaire based on the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) was distributed to 716 clinical year students to document their perceptions. RESULTS: One hundred responses were received with a response rate of 15.4% (110/716, including 96 from bedside teaching, 67 from practical skill session, 104 from PBL/tutorial, and 101 from lecture). For the mean score of the DREEM-extracted questionnaire, online PBL/tutorial scored the highest (2.72 ± 0.54), while bedside scored the lowest (2.38 ± 0.68, p = 0.001). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference when we compared different school years (p = 0.39), age (p = 0.37), gender (p = 1.00), year of internet experience (<17 vs ≥17 years p = 0.59), or prior online class experience (p = 0.62). When asked about students’ preference for online vs face-to-face classes. Students showed higher preferences for online PBL/tutorial (2.06 ± 0.75) and lectures (2.27 ± 0.81). Distraction remains a significant problem across all four learning activities. A multivariate analysis was performed regarding students’ reported behavior in comparison with their perception through the DREEM-extracted questionnaire. The results showed that good audio and video quality had a significant and positive correlation with their perception of online bedside teaching, practical skill sessions, and PBL/tutorial. It also showed that the use of the video camera correlated with an increase in perception scores for lectures. CONCLUSION: The present analysis has demonstrated that students’ perception of different online synchronous interactive learning activities varies. Further investigations are required on minimizing distraction during online classes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03958-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9812743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98127432023-01-05 Perception from students regarding online synchronous interactive teaching in the clinical year during COVID-19 pandemic Cheung, Billy H. H. Foo, Dominic C. C. Chu, Kent Man Co, Michael Lee, Lok Sze BMC Med Educ Research AIM: The global pandemic of COVID-19 has led to extensive practice of online learning. Our main objective is to compare different online synchronous interactive learning activities to evaluate students’ perceptions. Moreover, we also aim to identify factors influencing their perceptions in these classes. METHODS: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study focusing on clinical year medical students’ perceptions and feedback was conducted between February 2021 –June 2021 at the University of Hong Kong. Online learning activities were divided into bedside teaching, practical skill session, problem-based learning (PBL) or tutorial, and lecture. A questionnaire based on the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) was distributed to 716 clinical year students to document their perceptions. RESULTS: One hundred responses were received with a response rate of 15.4% (110/716, including 96 from bedside teaching, 67 from practical skill session, 104 from PBL/tutorial, and 101 from lecture). For the mean score of the DREEM-extracted questionnaire, online PBL/tutorial scored the highest (2.72 ± 0.54), while bedside scored the lowest (2.38 ± 0.68, p = 0.001). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference when we compared different school years (p = 0.39), age (p = 0.37), gender (p = 1.00), year of internet experience (<17 vs ≥17 years p = 0.59), or prior online class experience (p = 0.62). When asked about students’ preference for online vs face-to-face classes. Students showed higher preferences for online PBL/tutorial (2.06 ± 0.75) and lectures (2.27 ± 0.81). Distraction remains a significant problem across all four learning activities. A multivariate analysis was performed regarding students’ reported behavior in comparison with their perception through the DREEM-extracted questionnaire. The results showed that good audio and video quality had a significant and positive correlation with their perception of online bedside teaching, practical skill sessions, and PBL/tutorial. It also showed that the use of the video camera correlated with an increase in perception scores for lectures. CONCLUSION: The present analysis has demonstrated that students’ perception of different online synchronous interactive learning activities varies. Further investigations are required on minimizing distraction during online classes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03958-8. BioMed Central 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9812743/ /pubmed/36600224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03958-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Cheung, Billy H. H. Foo, Dominic C. C. Chu, Kent Man Co, Michael Lee, Lok Sze Perception from students regarding online synchronous interactive teaching in the clinical year during COVID-19 pandemic |
title | Perception from students regarding online synchronous interactive teaching in the clinical year during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | Perception from students regarding online synchronous interactive teaching in the clinical year during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Perception from students regarding online synchronous interactive teaching in the clinical year during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Perception from students regarding online synchronous interactive teaching in the clinical year during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | Perception from students regarding online synchronous interactive teaching in the clinical year during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | perception from students regarding online synchronous interactive teaching in the clinical year during covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03958-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheungbillyhh perceptionfromstudentsregardingonlinesynchronousinteractiveteachingintheclinicalyearduringcovid19pandemic AT foodominiccc perceptionfromstudentsregardingonlinesynchronousinteractiveteachingintheclinicalyearduringcovid19pandemic AT chukentman perceptionfromstudentsregardingonlinesynchronousinteractiveteachingintheclinicalyearduringcovid19pandemic AT comichael perceptionfromstudentsregardingonlinesynchronousinteractiveteachingintheclinicalyearduringcovid19pandemic AT leeloksze perceptionfromstudentsregardingonlinesynchronousinteractiveteachingintheclinicalyearduringcovid19pandemic |