Cargando…

Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity

Cervical spine deformities (CSD) are complex surgical issues with currently heterogenous management strategies. The classification of CSD is still an evolving field. Rudimentary classification schemas were initially proposed in the late 20th century but were largely informal and based on the underly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaidi, Austin C., Kim, Han Jo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597621
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2245864.392
_version_ 1784864568062771200
author Kaidi, Austin C.
Kim, Han Jo
author_facet Kaidi, Austin C.
Kim, Han Jo
author_sort Kaidi, Austin C.
collection PubMed
description Cervical spine deformities (CSD) are complex surgical issues with currently heterogenous management strategies. The classification of CSD is still an evolving field. Rudimentary classification schemas were initially proposed in the late 20th century but were largely informal and based on the underlying etiology (i.e. , postsurgical, traumatic, or inflammatory). The first formal classification schema was proposed by Ames et al. in 2015 who established a standard nomenclature for describing these deformities. This classification system established 5 deformity descriptors based on curve apex location (cervical, cervicothoracic, thoracic, craniovertebral junctional, and coronal deformities) and 5 deformity modifiers which helped surgeons utilize a standard language when discussing CSD patients. Koller et al. in 2019 subsequently established a classification system for patients with rigid cervical kyphosis based on regional and global sagittal alignment. Most recently, Kim et al. in 2020 proposed an updated classification system utilizing dynamic cervical spine imaging to guide surgical treatment of CSD patients. It identified 4 major groups of deformities – (1) those with “flat-neck” deformities caused by cervical lordosis T1 slope mismatch; (2) those with focal kyphotic deformities between 2 cervical vertebrae; (3) those with cervicothoracic deformities caused by large T1 slope; and (4) those with coronal deformities. Group 2 deformities most often required combined anterior-posterior approaches with short constructs, and group 3 deformities most often required posterior-only approaches with 3-column osteotomies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9816582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98165822023-01-11 Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity Kaidi, Austin C. Kim, Han Jo Neurospine Review Article Cervical spine deformities (CSD) are complex surgical issues with currently heterogenous management strategies. The classification of CSD is still an evolving field. Rudimentary classification schemas were initially proposed in the late 20th century but were largely informal and based on the underlying etiology (i.e. , postsurgical, traumatic, or inflammatory). The first formal classification schema was proposed by Ames et al. in 2015 who established a standard nomenclature for describing these deformities. This classification system established 5 deformity descriptors based on curve apex location (cervical, cervicothoracic, thoracic, craniovertebral junctional, and coronal deformities) and 5 deformity modifiers which helped surgeons utilize a standard language when discussing CSD patients. Koller et al. in 2019 subsequently established a classification system for patients with rigid cervical kyphosis based on regional and global sagittal alignment. Most recently, Kim et al. in 2020 proposed an updated classification system utilizing dynamic cervical spine imaging to guide surgical treatment of CSD patients. It identified 4 major groups of deformities – (1) those with “flat-neck” deformities caused by cervical lordosis T1 slope mismatch; (2) those with focal kyphotic deformities between 2 cervical vertebrae; (3) those with cervicothoracic deformities caused by large T1 slope; and (4) those with coronal deformities. Group 2 deformities most often required combined anterior-posterior approaches with short constructs, and group 3 deformities most often required posterior-only approaches with 3-column osteotomies. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2022-12 2022-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9816582/ /pubmed/36597621 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2245864.392 Text en Copyright © 2022 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kaidi, Austin C.
Kim, Han Jo
Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity
title Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity
title_full Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity
title_fullStr Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity
title_full_unstemmed Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity
title_short Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity
title_sort classification(s) of cervical deformity
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597621
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2245864.392
work_keys_str_mv AT kaidiaustinc classificationsofcervicaldeformity
AT kimhanjo classificationsofcervicaldeformity