Cargando…
Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids
Milk is a rich source of lipids, with the major components being triglycerides (TAG) and phospholipids (mainly phosphatidylcholine (PC), sphingomyelin (SM), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylinositol (PI)). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is the p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9818897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36613379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12010163 |
_version_ | 1784865098425171968 |
---|---|
author | Li, Cheng Liu, Zhiqian Marett, Leah Pryce, Jennie Rochfort, Simone |
author_facet | Li, Cheng Liu, Zhiqian Marett, Leah Pryce, Jennie Rochfort, Simone |
author_sort | Li, Cheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Milk is a rich source of lipids, with the major components being triglycerides (TAG) and phospholipids (mainly phosphatidylcholine (PC), sphingomyelin (SM), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylinositol (PI)). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is the predominant technique for lipid identification and quantification across all biological samples. While fatty acid (FA) composition of the major lipid classes of milk can be readily determined using tandem MS, elucidating the regio-distribution and double bond position of the FA remains difficult. Various workflows have been reported on the quantification of lipid species in biological samples in the past 20 years, but no standard or consensus methods are currently available for the quantification of milk phospholipids. This study will examine the influence of several common factors in lipid analysis workflow (including lipid extraction protocols, LC stationary phases, mobile phase buffers, gradient elution programmes, mass analyser resolution and isotope correction) on the quantification outcome of bovine milk phospholipids. The pros and cons of the current LC-MS methods as well as the critical problems to be solved will also be discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9818897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98188972023-01-07 Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids Li, Cheng Liu, Zhiqian Marett, Leah Pryce, Jennie Rochfort, Simone Foods Article Milk is a rich source of lipids, with the major components being triglycerides (TAG) and phospholipids (mainly phosphatidylcholine (PC), sphingomyelin (SM), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylinositol (PI)). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is the predominant technique for lipid identification and quantification across all biological samples. While fatty acid (FA) composition of the major lipid classes of milk can be readily determined using tandem MS, elucidating the regio-distribution and double bond position of the FA remains difficult. Various workflows have been reported on the quantification of lipid species in biological samples in the past 20 years, but no standard or consensus methods are currently available for the quantification of milk phospholipids. This study will examine the influence of several common factors in lipid analysis workflow (including lipid extraction protocols, LC stationary phases, mobile phase buffers, gradient elution programmes, mass analyser resolution and isotope correction) on the quantification outcome of bovine milk phospholipids. The pros and cons of the current LC-MS methods as well as the critical problems to be solved will also be discussed. MDPI 2022-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9818897/ /pubmed/36613379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12010163 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Cheng Liu, Zhiqian Marett, Leah Pryce, Jennie Rochfort, Simone Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids |
title | Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids |
title_full | Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids |
title_short | Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids |
title_sort | comparison of workflows for milk lipid analysis: phospholipids |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9818897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36613379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12010163 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT licheng comparisonofworkflowsformilklipidanalysisphospholipids AT liuzhiqian comparisonofworkflowsformilklipidanalysisphospholipids AT marettleah comparisonofworkflowsformilklipidanalysisphospholipids AT prycejennie comparisonofworkflowsformilklipidanalysisphospholipids AT rochfortsimone comparisonofworkflowsformilklipidanalysisphospholipids |