Cargando…

Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids

Milk is a rich source of lipids, with the major components being triglycerides (TAG) and phospholipids (mainly phosphatidylcholine (PC), sphingomyelin (SM), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylinositol (PI)). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Cheng, Liu, Zhiqian, Marett, Leah, Pryce, Jennie, Rochfort, Simone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9818897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36613379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12010163
_version_ 1784865098425171968
author Li, Cheng
Liu, Zhiqian
Marett, Leah
Pryce, Jennie
Rochfort, Simone
author_facet Li, Cheng
Liu, Zhiqian
Marett, Leah
Pryce, Jennie
Rochfort, Simone
author_sort Li, Cheng
collection PubMed
description Milk is a rich source of lipids, with the major components being triglycerides (TAG) and phospholipids (mainly phosphatidylcholine (PC), sphingomyelin (SM), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylinositol (PI)). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is the predominant technique for lipid identification and quantification across all biological samples. While fatty acid (FA) composition of the major lipid classes of milk can be readily determined using tandem MS, elucidating the regio-distribution and double bond position of the FA remains difficult. Various workflows have been reported on the quantification of lipid species in biological samples in the past 20 years, but no standard or consensus methods are currently available for the quantification of milk phospholipids. This study will examine the influence of several common factors in lipid analysis workflow (including lipid extraction protocols, LC stationary phases, mobile phase buffers, gradient elution programmes, mass analyser resolution and isotope correction) on the quantification outcome of bovine milk phospholipids. The pros and cons of the current LC-MS methods as well as the critical problems to be solved will also be discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9818897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98188972023-01-07 Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids Li, Cheng Liu, Zhiqian Marett, Leah Pryce, Jennie Rochfort, Simone Foods Article Milk is a rich source of lipids, with the major components being triglycerides (TAG) and phospholipids (mainly phosphatidylcholine (PC), sphingomyelin (SM), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylinositol (PI)). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is the predominant technique for lipid identification and quantification across all biological samples. While fatty acid (FA) composition of the major lipid classes of milk can be readily determined using tandem MS, elucidating the regio-distribution and double bond position of the FA remains difficult. Various workflows have been reported on the quantification of lipid species in biological samples in the past 20 years, but no standard or consensus methods are currently available for the quantification of milk phospholipids. This study will examine the influence of several common factors in lipid analysis workflow (including lipid extraction protocols, LC stationary phases, mobile phase buffers, gradient elution programmes, mass analyser resolution and isotope correction) on the quantification outcome of bovine milk phospholipids. The pros and cons of the current LC-MS methods as well as the critical problems to be solved will also be discussed. MDPI 2022-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9818897/ /pubmed/36613379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12010163 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Cheng
Liu, Zhiqian
Marett, Leah
Pryce, Jennie
Rochfort, Simone
Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids
title Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids
title_full Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids
title_fullStr Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids
title_short Comparison of Workflows for Milk Lipid Analysis: Phospholipids
title_sort comparison of workflows for milk lipid analysis: phospholipids
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9818897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36613379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12010163
work_keys_str_mv AT licheng comparisonofworkflowsformilklipidanalysisphospholipids
AT liuzhiqian comparisonofworkflowsformilklipidanalysisphospholipids
AT marettleah comparisonofworkflowsformilklipidanalysisphospholipids
AT prycejennie comparisonofworkflowsformilklipidanalysisphospholipids
AT rochfortsimone comparisonofworkflowsformilklipidanalysisphospholipids