Cargando…

Camera Arrangement Optimization for Workspace Monitoring in Human–Robot Collaboration

Human–robot interaction is becoming an integral part of practice. There is a greater emphasis on safety in workplaces where a robot may bump into a worker. In practice, there are solutions that control the robot based on the potential energy in a collision or a robot re-planning the straight-line tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oščádal, Petr, Kot, Tomáš, Spurný, Tomáš, Suder, Jiří, Vocetka, Michal, Dobeš, Libor, Bobovský, Zdenko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36616896
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010295
_version_ 1784866266483261440
author Oščádal, Petr
Kot, Tomáš
Spurný, Tomáš
Suder, Jiří
Vocetka, Michal
Dobeš, Libor
Bobovský, Zdenko
author_facet Oščádal, Petr
Kot, Tomáš
Spurný, Tomáš
Suder, Jiří
Vocetka, Michal
Dobeš, Libor
Bobovský, Zdenko
author_sort Oščádal, Petr
collection PubMed
description Human–robot interaction is becoming an integral part of practice. There is a greater emphasis on safety in workplaces where a robot may bump into a worker. In practice, there are solutions that control the robot based on the potential energy in a collision or a robot re-planning the straight-line trajectory. However, a sensor system must be designed to detect obstacles across the human–robot shared workspace. So far, there is no procedure that engineers can follow in practice to deploy sensors ideally. We come up with the idea of classifying the space as an importance index, which determines what part of the workspace sensors should sense to ensure ideal obstacle sensing. Then, the ideal camera positions can be automatically found according to this classified map. Based on the experiment, the coverage of the important volume by the calculated camera position in the workspace was found to be on average 37% greater compared to a camera placed intuitively by test subjects. Using two cameras at the workplace, the calculated positions were 27% more effective than the subjects’ camera positions. Furthermore, for three cameras, the calculated positions were 13% better than the subjects’ camera positions, with a total coverage of more than 99% of the classified map.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9823859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98238592023-01-08 Camera Arrangement Optimization for Workspace Monitoring in Human–Robot Collaboration Oščádal, Petr Kot, Tomáš Spurný, Tomáš Suder, Jiří Vocetka, Michal Dobeš, Libor Bobovský, Zdenko Sensors (Basel) Article Human–robot interaction is becoming an integral part of practice. There is a greater emphasis on safety in workplaces where a robot may bump into a worker. In practice, there are solutions that control the robot based on the potential energy in a collision or a robot re-planning the straight-line trajectory. However, a sensor system must be designed to detect obstacles across the human–robot shared workspace. So far, there is no procedure that engineers can follow in practice to deploy sensors ideally. We come up with the idea of classifying the space as an importance index, which determines what part of the workspace sensors should sense to ensure ideal obstacle sensing. Then, the ideal camera positions can be automatically found according to this classified map. Based on the experiment, the coverage of the important volume by the calculated camera position in the workspace was found to be on average 37% greater compared to a camera placed intuitively by test subjects. Using two cameras at the workplace, the calculated positions were 27% more effective than the subjects’ camera positions. Furthermore, for three cameras, the calculated positions were 13% better than the subjects’ camera positions, with a total coverage of more than 99% of the classified map. MDPI 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9823859/ /pubmed/36616896 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010295 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Oščádal, Petr
Kot, Tomáš
Spurný, Tomáš
Suder, Jiří
Vocetka, Michal
Dobeš, Libor
Bobovský, Zdenko
Camera Arrangement Optimization for Workspace Monitoring in Human–Robot Collaboration
title Camera Arrangement Optimization for Workspace Monitoring in Human–Robot Collaboration
title_full Camera Arrangement Optimization for Workspace Monitoring in Human–Robot Collaboration
title_fullStr Camera Arrangement Optimization for Workspace Monitoring in Human–Robot Collaboration
title_full_unstemmed Camera Arrangement Optimization for Workspace Monitoring in Human–Robot Collaboration
title_short Camera Arrangement Optimization for Workspace Monitoring in Human–Robot Collaboration
title_sort camera arrangement optimization for workspace monitoring in human–robot collaboration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36616896
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010295
work_keys_str_mv AT oscadalpetr cameraarrangementoptimizationforworkspacemonitoringinhumanrobotcollaboration
AT kottomas cameraarrangementoptimizationforworkspacemonitoringinhumanrobotcollaboration
AT spurnytomas cameraarrangementoptimizationforworkspacemonitoringinhumanrobotcollaboration
AT suderjiri cameraarrangementoptimizationforworkspacemonitoringinhumanrobotcollaboration
AT vocetkamichal cameraarrangementoptimizationforworkspacemonitoringinhumanrobotcollaboration
AT dobeslibor cameraarrangementoptimizationforworkspacemonitoringinhumanrobotcollaboration
AT bobovskyzdenko cameraarrangementoptimizationforworkspacemonitoringinhumanrobotcollaboration