Cargando…

EdTech for Ugandan girls: Affordances of different technologies for girls' secondary education during the Covid‐19 pandemic

MOTIVATION: This article discusses the use of educational technology (EdTech) in girls' education at PEAS (Promoting Education in African Schools) schools in rural Uganda during the Covid‐19‐related school closures. PURPOSE: This article addresses a research gap surrounding the potential use of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damani, Kalifa, Daltry, Rebecca, Jordan, Katy, Hills, Libby, Evans, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12619
_version_ 1784866732690636800
author Damani, Kalifa
Daltry, Rebecca
Jordan, Katy
Hills, Libby
Evans, Laura
author_facet Damani, Kalifa
Daltry, Rebecca
Jordan, Katy
Hills, Libby
Evans, Laura
author_sort Damani, Kalifa
collection PubMed
description MOTIVATION: This article discusses the use of educational technology (EdTech) in girls' education at PEAS (Promoting Education in African Schools) schools in rural Uganda during the Covid‐19‐related school closures. PURPOSE: This article addresses a research gap surrounding the potential use of EdTech to support girls' education, focusing on the barriers to girls' EdTech use and how technology might be used to enhance girls' education in disadvantaged rural areas—specifically their academic learning and their social and emotional learning. METHODS AND APPROACH: A sequential, explanatory mixed‐methods case‐study approach was used. Quantitative exploration of a dataset of 483 Ugandan students, from 28 PEAS schools, was first conducted, followed by interviews with PEAS staff to elucidate the reasons and context behind the findings. FINDINGS: Findings show that female students are less likely than male students to have access to their caregivers' phones for learning. The form of EdTech that appeared to be most beneficial for girls' academic learning was radio; girls also had significantly more interest in tuning into radio broadcasts than boys did. Also, poorer boys were more likely to be influenced by SMS messages than wealthier boys. Apart from gender‐based differences, students with more highly educated parents found SMS messages more helpful, and phone calls from teachers appeared to help boost younger students' self‐confidence. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: The findings suggest that policy‐makers need to: carefully consider provision of education through multiple modes of EdTech in order to ensure that it reaches all students; ensure that caregivers are involved in the strategies developed for girls' education; make EdTech interventions interactive; and consider language in EdTech interventions. Given the gender differences which emerged, the findings are of relevance both to supporting the continuation of educational provision during periods of school closure, and also in terms of finding additional ways to support girls' education alongside formal schooling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9825936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98259362023-01-09 EdTech for Ugandan girls: Affordances of different technologies for girls' secondary education during the Covid‐19 pandemic Damani, Kalifa Daltry, Rebecca Jordan, Katy Hills, Libby Evans, Laura Dev Policy Rev Articles MOTIVATION: This article discusses the use of educational technology (EdTech) in girls' education at PEAS (Promoting Education in African Schools) schools in rural Uganda during the Covid‐19‐related school closures. PURPOSE: This article addresses a research gap surrounding the potential use of EdTech to support girls' education, focusing on the barriers to girls' EdTech use and how technology might be used to enhance girls' education in disadvantaged rural areas—specifically their academic learning and their social and emotional learning. METHODS AND APPROACH: A sequential, explanatory mixed‐methods case‐study approach was used. Quantitative exploration of a dataset of 483 Ugandan students, from 28 PEAS schools, was first conducted, followed by interviews with PEAS staff to elucidate the reasons and context behind the findings. FINDINGS: Findings show that female students are less likely than male students to have access to their caregivers' phones for learning. The form of EdTech that appeared to be most beneficial for girls' academic learning was radio; girls also had significantly more interest in tuning into radio broadcasts than boys did. Also, poorer boys were more likely to be influenced by SMS messages than wealthier boys. Apart from gender‐based differences, students with more highly educated parents found SMS messages more helpful, and phone calls from teachers appeared to help boost younger students' self‐confidence. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: The findings suggest that policy‐makers need to: carefully consider provision of education through multiple modes of EdTech in order to ensure that it reaches all students; ensure that caregivers are involved in the strategies developed for girls' education; make EdTech interventions interactive; and consider language in EdTech interventions. Given the gender differences which emerged, the findings are of relevance both to supporting the continuation of educational provision during periods of school closure, and also in terms of finding additional ways to support girls' education alongside formal schooling. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-05 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9825936/ /pubmed/36632444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12619 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Development Policy Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of ODI. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Damani, Kalifa
Daltry, Rebecca
Jordan, Katy
Hills, Libby
Evans, Laura
EdTech for Ugandan girls: Affordances of different technologies for girls' secondary education during the Covid‐19 pandemic
title EdTech for Ugandan girls: Affordances of different technologies for girls' secondary education during the Covid‐19 pandemic
title_full EdTech for Ugandan girls: Affordances of different technologies for girls' secondary education during the Covid‐19 pandemic
title_fullStr EdTech for Ugandan girls: Affordances of different technologies for girls' secondary education during the Covid‐19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed EdTech for Ugandan girls: Affordances of different technologies for girls' secondary education during the Covid‐19 pandemic
title_short EdTech for Ugandan girls: Affordances of different technologies for girls' secondary education during the Covid‐19 pandemic
title_sort edtech for ugandan girls: affordances of different technologies for girls' secondary education during the covid‐19 pandemic
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12619
work_keys_str_mv AT damanikalifa edtechforugandangirlsaffordancesofdifferenttechnologiesforgirlssecondaryeducationduringthecovid19pandemic
AT daltryrebecca edtechforugandangirlsaffordancesofdifferenttechnologiesforgirlssecondaryeducationduringthecovid19pandemic
AT jordankaty edtechforugandangirlsaffordancesofdifferenttechnologiesforgirlssecondaryeducationduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hillslibby edtechforugandangirlsaffordancesofdifferenttechnologiesforgirlssecondaryeducationduringthecovid19pandemic
AT evanslaura edtechforugandangirlsaffordancesofdifferenttechnologiesforgirlssecondaryeducationduringthecovid19pandemic