Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single‐best discrete choice experiments, should we use best‐worst, best‐best or ranking for preference elicitation?

This study undertook a head‐to‐head comparison of best‐worst, best‐best and ranking discrete choice experiments (DCEs) to help decide which method to use if moving beyond traditional single‐best DCEs. Respondents were randomized to one of three preference elicitation methods. Rank‐ordered (exploded)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huls, Samare P. I., Lancsar, Emily, Donkers, Bas, Ride, Jemimah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Research Articles
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.4599

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.4599

Ejemplares similares