Cargando…
Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single‐best discrete choice experiments, should we use best‐worst, best‐best or ranking for preference elicitation?
This study undertook a head‐to‐head comparison of best‐worst, best‐best and ranking discrete choice experiments (DCEs) to help decide which method to use if moving beyond traditional single‐best DCEs. Respondents were randomized to one of three preference elicitation methods. Rank‐ordered (exploded)...
Autores principales: | Huls, Samare P. I., Lancsar, Emily, Donkers, Bas, Ride, Jemimah |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.4599 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment
por: Soekhai, Vikas, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times”
por: Yu Chuan, Jack Li
Publicado: (2022) -
The Best of Times and Yet the Worst of Times
por: Greear, Emma, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A Think Aloud Study Comparing the Validity and Acceptability of Discrete Choice and Best Worst Scaling Methods
por: Whitty, Jennifer A., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
What are colorectal cancer survivors’ preferences for dietary advice? A best-worst discrete choice experiment
por: Wright, Stuart J., et al.
Publicado: (2017)