Cargando…
Has pedagogy, technology, and Covid‐19 killed the face‐to‐face lecture?
The lecture has been around for centuries and has featured as a popular and frequent component in higher education courses across many disciplines including anatomy. In more recent years, there has been a growing shift toward blended learning and related pedagogies that encourage active participatio...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ase.2224 |
_version_ | 1784866805140946944 |
---|---|
author | Evans, Darrell J. R. |
author_facet | Evans, Darrell J. R. |
author_sort | Evans, Darrell J. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The lecture has been around for centuries and has featured as a popular and frequent component in higher education courses across many disciplines including anatomy. In more recent years, there has been a growing shift toward blended learning and related pedagogies that encourage active participation of students in both face‐to‐face and online learning environments. Unfortunately, in many cases, the lecture, which has typically focused on the transmission of information from educator to student has not been adapted to become a more learner‐oriented approach with opportunities for students to actively interact and engage. As a result, the future of whether the lecture should continue has once again become a center of debate. The consequence of the Covid‐19 pandemic and its aftermath have added to this with institutions now looking to stop all lectures or offer them in an online format only. This commentary argues that lecture‐style components could still feature within face‐to‐face and online provision, but only if they are used sparingly within a blended curriculum, have a defined use that aligns well to learning outcomes, are assessed as the most effective method pedagogically, and importantly integrate approaches and activities that promote student engagement. Anatomy educators have demonstrated for years that they are able to be at the forefront of pedagogical change and evidenced during the pandemic their agile and innovative ability to adapt and do things differently. Therefore, the fate of the lecture, at least in anatomy, may well be in their hands. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9826245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98262452023-01-09 Has pedagogy, technology, and Covid‐19 killed the face‐to‐face lecture? Evans, Darrell J. R. Anat Sci Educ Viewpoint Commentary The lecture has been around for centuries and has featured as a popular and frequent component in higher education courses across many disciplines including anatomy. In more recent years, there has been a growing shift toward blended learning and related pedagogies that encourage active participation of students in both face‐to‐face and online learning environments. Unfortunately, in many cases, the lecture, which has typically focused on the transmission of information from educator to student has not been adapted to become a more learner‐oriented approach with opportunities for students to actively interact and engage. As a result, the future of whether the lecture should continue has once again become a center of debate. The consequence of the Covid‐19 pandemic and its aftermath have added to this with institutions now looking to stop all lectures or offer them in an online format only. This commentary argues that lecture‐style components could still feature within face‐to‐face and online provision, but only if they are used sparingly within a blended curriculum, have a defined use that aligns well to learning outcomes, are assessed as the most effective method pedagogically, and importantly integrate approaches and activities that promote student engagement. Anatomy educators have demonstrated for years that they are able to be at the forefront of pedagogical change and evidenced during the pandemic their agile and innovative ability to adapt and do things differently. Therefore, the fate of the lecture, at least in anatomy, may well be in their hands. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9826245/ /pubmed/36102494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ase.2224 Text en © 2022 The Author. Anatomical Sciences Education published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for Anatomy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Viewpoint Commentary Evans, Darrell J. R. Has pedagogy, technology, and Covid‐19 killed the face‐to‐face lecture? |
title | Has pedagogy, technology, and Covid‐19 killed the face‐to‐face lecture? |
title_full | Has pedagogy, technology, and Covid‐19 killed the face‐to‐face lecture? |
title_fullStr | Has pedagogy, technology, and Covid‐19 killed the face‐to‐face lecture? |
title_full_unstemmed | Has pedagogy, technology, and Covid‐19 killed the face‐to‐face lecture? |
title_short | Has pedagogy, technology, and Covid‐19 killed the face‐to‐face lecture? |
title_sort | has pedagogy, technology, and covid‐19 killed the face‐to‐face lecture? |
topic | Viewpoint Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ase.2224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evansdarrelljr haspedagogytechnologyandcovid19killedthefacetofacelecture |