Cargando…

“What medical students with better academic results do: a cross-sectional analysis”

BACKGROUND: With university material doubling over time, medical students need to learn how to become successful life-long learners. Overall a Deep Approach (DA) to learning, and Self-Regulation (SR) skills are among the elements with a potential to accelerate learning, and Student Engagement (SE) h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Urrizola, Amaia, Santiago, Raúl, Gea, Alfredo, Rubio, Sandra, Vilalta-Lacarra, Anna, Rodríguez, Javier, Arbea, Leire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36631815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-03999-7
_version_ 1784868647060111360
author Urrizola, Amaia
Santiago, Raúl
Gea, Alfredo
Rubio, Sandra
Vilalta-Lacarra, Anna
Rodríguez, Javier
Arbea, Leire
author_facet Urrizola, Amaia
Santiago, Raúl
Gea, Alfredo
Rubio, Sandra
Vilalta-Lacarra, Anna
Rodríguez, Javier
Arbea, Leire
author_sort Urrizola, Amaia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With university material doubling over time, medical students need to learn how to become successful life-long learners. Overall a Deep Approach (DA) to learning, and Self-Regulation (SR) skills are among the elements with a potential to accelerate learning, and Student Engagement (SE) has been associated with better university outcomes. However, specific recommendations concerning what students should do are lacking. The aim of this study was to identify above-average students’ specific attitudes and strategies toward learning. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of the answers to the validated questionnaires Revised Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F), SE, and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) of 155 s and third-year students included in a prospective interventional study in the University of Navarre in September 2020 was performed. Students were stratified according to their standardized average mean in above-average (mean > 0) and below-average (mean ≤ 0). RESULTS: Overall, 67.1% of students scored higher in DA than in Surface Approach (SA) and had very high Intrinsic Value (IV, median 5.9). A higher proportion of above-average students had DA > SA score (72.7% vs 57.1%, p = 0.05), and showed higher scores in SR (median 4.9 vs 4.3, p = 0.007) compared to below-average, while the latter scored higher in SA (median 24.5 vs 23, p = 0.04), and surface motive (median 11 vs 9, p = 0.007). No differences were found in SE, and both groups had average scores in the cooperative dimension. Differences were rooted to hard work, interest over material and prioritizing understanding over rote-learning motives and aligned strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Curricula design and assessment should be aligned to promote DA and SR skills among learners. Furthermore, it is paramount that teachers help instill students with interest over material and encourage understanding and hard work, since are traits associated with better results. More studies concerning metacognition and other promising traits for becoming life-long learners and prepared professionals should be made. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-03999-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9835338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98353382023-01-13 “What medical students with better academic results do: a cross-sectional analysis” Urrizola, Amaia Santiago, Raúl Gea, Alfredo Rubio, Sandra Vilalta-Lacarra, Anna Rodríguez, Javier Arbea, Leire BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: With university material doubling over time, medical students need to learn how to become successful life-long learners. Overall a Deep Approach (DA) to learning, and Self-Regulation (SR) skills are among the elements with a potential to accelerate learning, and Student Engagement (SE) has been associated with better university outcomes. However, specific recommendations concerning what students should do are lacking. The aim of this study was to identify above-average students’ specific attitudes and strategies toward learning. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of the answers to the validated questionnaires Revised Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F), SE, and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) of 155 s and third-year students included in a prospective interventional study in the University of Navarre in September 2020 was performed. Students were stratified according to their standardized average mean in above-average (mean > 0) and below-average (mean ≤ 0). RESULTS: Overall, 67.1% of students scored higher in DA than in Surface Approach (SA) and had very high Intrinsic Value (IV, median 5.9). A higher proportion of above-average students had DA > SA score (72.7% vs 57.1%, p = 0.05), and showed higher scores in SR (median 4.9 vs 4.3, p = 0.007) compared to below-average, while the latter scored higher in SA (median 24.5 vs 23, p = 0.04), and surface motive (median 11 vs 9, p = 0.007). No differences were found in SE, and both groups had average scores in the cooperative dimension. Differences were rooted to hard work, interest over material and prioritizing understanding over rote-learning motives and aligned strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Curricula design and assessment should be aligned to promote DA and SR skills among learners. Furthermore, it is paramount that teachers help instill students with interest over material and encourage understanding and hard work, since are traits associated with better results. More studies concerning metacognition and other promising traits for becoming life-long learners and prepared professionals should be made. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-03999-7. BioMed Central 2023-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9835338/ /pubmed/36631815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-03999-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Urrizola, Amaia
Santiago, Raúl
Gea, Alfredo
Rubio, Sandra
Vilalta-Lacarra, Anna
Rodríguez, Javier
Arbea, Leire
“What medical students with better academic results do: a cross-sectional analysis”
title “What medical students with better academic results do: a cross-sectional analysis”
title_full “What medical students with better academic results do: a cross-sectional analysis”
title_fullStr “What medical students with better academic results do: a cross-sectional analysis”
title_full_unstemmed “What medical students with better academic results do: a cross-sectional analysis”
title_short “What medical students with better academic results do: a cross-sectional analysis”
title_sort “what medical students with better academic results do: a cross-sectional analysis”
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36631815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-03999-7
work_keys_str_mv AT urrizolaamaia whatmedicalstudentswithbetteracademicresultsdoacrosssectionalanalysis
AT santiagoraul whatmedicalstudentswithbetteracademicresultsdoacrosssectionalanalysis
AT geaalfredo whatmedicalstudentswithbetteracademicresultsdoacrosssectionalanalysis
AT rubiosandra whatmedicalstudentswithbetteracademicresultsdoacrosssectionalanalysis
AT vilaltalacarraanna whatmedicalstudentswithbetteracademicresultsdoacrosssectionalanalysis
AT rodriguezjavier whatmedicalstudentswithbetteracademicresultsdoacrosssectionalanalysis
AT arbealeire whatmedicalstudentswithbetteracademicresultsdoacrosssectionalanalysis