Cargando…

Bioimpedance-based Authentication of Defrosted Versus Fresh Pork at the End of Refrigerated Shelf Life

Correct food labeling is a legal requirement and helps consumers to make informed purchasing choices. Mislabeling defrosted meat as fresh is illegal in the EU. However, there are no standardized technologies to authenticate fresh versus defrosted meat. We address this by testing if bioimpedance-base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osen, Daniel E., Abie, Sisay Mebre, Martinsen, Ørjan G., Egelandsdal, Bjørg, Münch, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699663
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2022-0017
_version_ 1784869165365985280
author Osen, Daniel E.
Abie, Sisay Mebre
Martinsen, Ørjan G.
Egelandsdal, Bjørg
Münch, Daniel
author_facet Osen, Daniel E.
Abie, Sisay Mebre
Martinsen, Ørjan G.
Egelandsdal, Bjørg
Münch, Daniel
author_sort Osen, Daniel E.
collection PubMed
description Correct food labeling is a legal requirement and helps consumers to make informed purchasing choices. Mislabeling defrosted meat as fresh is illegal in the EU. However, there are no standardized technologies to authenticate fresh versus defrosted meat. We address this by testing if bioimpedance-based measurements can separate defrosted meat from refrigerated-only meat at the end of shelf life, i.e., when also fresh meat shows deterioration. Pork sirloin samples from 20 pigs were first tested at 12 days postmortem (‘fresh group’). This time point was chosen to represent a typical use-by date for refrigerated storage of fresh pork. Then, all samples were transferred to a -24°C freezer for 3 days and thawed for 2 days before final testing (‘frozen-thawed group’). Bioimpedance analyses (BIA) were done in a frequency range of [10(2)-10(6) Hz]. Weight, pH and electrode positioning were assessed to test for potential confounding effects. Statistics for treatment dependent differences were based on the established P(y) parameter and phase angle, which were extracted from the BI spectra. We found that using bioimpedance testing with tetrapolar electrodes, P(y) and phase angle allowed almost complete separation of fresh and previously frozen samples. However, within the whole sample population, there was some overlap between the spectra of fresh and frozen samples. Yet, based on P(y), only one fresh sample (5% of N(total)=20) fell in the lowest P(y) class with all the frozen samples. We used a multifactorial design that allowed to test the effects of potential confounding factors, such as electrode positioning and meat quality parameters. We found a relatively low explained variance for the P(y) parameter, indicating that confounding effects from other factors or quality defects in fresh pork may affect the detection capacity of bioimpedance-based authentication of fresh pork. Our data, therefore, suggest that reliable fresh-label authentication with bioimpedance testing should be based on testing a small number of samples to represent a specific lot of pork that is to be inspected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9837875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98378752023-01-24 Bioimpedance-based Authentication of Defrosted Versus Fresh Pork at the End of Refrigerated Shelf Life Osen, Daniel E. Abie, Sisay Mebre Martinsen, Ørjan G. Egelandsdal, Bjørg Münch, Daniel J Electr Bioimpedance Research Article Correct food labeling is a legal requirement and helps consumers to make informed purchasing choices. Mislabeling defrosted meat as fresh is illegal in the EU. However, there are no standardized technologies to authenticate fresh versus defrosted meat. We address this by testing if bioimpedance-based measurements can separate defrosted meat from refrigerated-only meat at the end of shelf life, i.e., when also fresh meat shows deterioration. Pork sirloin samples from 20 pigs were first tested at 12 days postmortem (‘fresh group’). This time point was chosen to represent a typical use-by date for refrigerated storage of fresh pork. Then, all samples were transferred to a -24°C freezer for 3 days and thawed for 2 days before final testing (‘frozen-thawed group’). Bioimpedance analyses (BIA) were done in a frequency range of [10(2)-10(6) Hz]. Weight, pH and electrode positioning were assessed to test for potential confounding effects. Statistics for treatment dependent differences were based on the established P(y) parameter and phase angle, which were extracted from the BI spectra. We found that using bioimpedance testing with tetrapolar electrodes, P(y) and phase angle allowed almost complete separation of fresh and previously frozen samples. However, within the whole sample population, there was some overlap between the spectra of fresh and frozen samples. Yet, based on P(y), only one fresh sample (5% of N(total)=20) fell in the lowest P(y) class with all the frozen samples. We used a multifactorial design that allowed to test the effects of potential confounding factors, such as electrode positioning and meat quality parameters. We found a relatively low explained variance for the P(y) parameter, indicating that confounding effects from other factors or quality defects in fresh pork may affect the detection capacity of bioimpedance-based authentication of fresh pork. Our data, therefore, suggest that reliable fresh-label authentication with bioimpedance testing should be based on testing a small number of samples to represent a specific lot of pork that is to be inspected. Sciendo 2023-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9837875/ /pubmed/36699663 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2022-0017 Text en © 2022 Daniel E. Osen, Sisay Mebre Abie, Ørjan G. Martinsen, Bjørg Egelandsdal, Daniel Münch, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Osen, Daniel E.
Abie, Sisay Mebre
Martinsen, Ørjan G.
Egelandsdal, Bjørg
Münch, Daniel
Bioimpedance-based Authentication of Defrosted Versus Fresh Pork at the End of Refrigerated Shelf Life
title Bioimpedance-based Authentication of Defrosted Versus Fresh Pork at the End of Refrigerated Shelf Life
title_full Bioimpedance-based Authentication of Defrosted Versus Fresh Pork at the End of Refrigerated Shelf Life
title_fullStr Bioimpedance-based Authentication of Defrosted Versus Fresh Pork at the End of Refrigerated Shelf Life
title_full_unstemmed Bioimpedance-based Authentication of Defrosted Versus Fresh Pork at the End of Refrigerated Shelf Life
title_short Bioimpedance-based Authentication of Defrosted Versus Fresh Pork at the End of Refrigerated Shelf Life
title_sort bioimpedance-based authentication of defrosted versus fresh pork at the end of refrigerated shelf life
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699663
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2022-0017
work_keys_str_mv AT osendaniele bioimpedancebasedauthenticationofdefrostedversusfreshporkattheendofrefrigeratedshelflife
AT abiesisaymebre bioimpedancebasedauthenticationofdefrostedversusfreshporkattheendofrefrigeratedshelflife
AT martinsenørjang bioimpedancebasedauthenticationofdefrostedversusfreshporkattheendofrefrigeratedshelflife
AT egelandsdalbjørg bioimpedancebasedauthenticationofdefrostedversusfreshporkattheendofrefrigeratedshelflife
AT munchdaniel bioimpedancebasedauthenticationofdefrostedversusfreshporkattheendofrefrigeratedshelflife