Cargando…

Postprandial lipemic response in dairy-avoiding females following an equal volume of sheep milk relative to cow milk: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Sheep milk (SM) is an alternate dairy source, which despite many similarities, has both compositional and structural differences in lipids compared to cow milk (CM). Studies are yet to examine the apparent digestibility of SM lipids, relative to CM, and the potential impact on the plasma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teng, Fei, Samuelsson, Linda M., Milan, Amber Marie, Subbaraj, Arvind, Agnew, Michael, Shrestha, Aahana, Cameron-Smith, David, Day, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36687710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1029813
_version_ 1784871272472117248
author Teng, Fei
Samuelsson, Linda M.
Milan, Amber Marie
Subbaraj, Arvind
Agnew, Michael
Shrestha, Aahana
Cameron-Smith, David
Day, Li
author_facet Teng, Fei
Samuelsson, Linda M.
Milan, Amber Marie
Subbaraj, Arvind
Agnew, Michael
Shrestha, Aahana
Cameron-Smith, David
Day, Li
author_sort Teng, Fei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sheep milk (SM) is an alternate dairy source, which despite many similarities, has both compositional and structural differences in lipids compared to cow milk (CM). Studies are yet to examine the apparent digestibility of SM lipids, relative to CM, and the potential impact on the plasma lipidome. OBJECTIVE: To determine the response of the circulatory lipidome to equal volume servings of SM and CM, in females who avoid dairy products. METHOD: In a double-blinded, randomized, cross-over trial, self-described dairy avoiding females (n = 30; 24.4 ± 1.1 years) drank SM or CM (650 mL; 33.4 vs. 21.3 g total lipid content; reconstituted from spray dried milk powders) following an overnight fast. Blood samples were collected at fasting and at regular intervals over 4 h after milk consumption. The plasma lipidome was analyzed by LC-MS and fatty acids were quantified by GC-FID. RESULTS: The overall postprandial triglyceride (TG) response was similar between SM and CM. TG concentrations were comparable at fasting for both groups, however they were higher after CM consumption at 30 min (interaction milk × time p = 0.003), well before any postprandial lipemic response. This was despite greater quantities provided by SM. However, there were notable differences in the postprandial fatty acid response, with SM leading to an increase in short- and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) (C6:0, C8:0, and C10:0) and several long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) (C18:1 t11, c9, t11-CLA, and C20:0; interaction time × milk p < 0.05). This corresponded to a greater postprandial response for medium chain triglycerides (MCTs) C10:0, including TG(10:0/14:0/18:1), TG(16:0/10:0/12:0), and TG(16:0/10:0/14:0) (interaction time × milk p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher fat content, SM ingestion resulted in a greater circulating abundance of MCTs, without increasing total postprandial triglyceride response, when compared to CM. The greater abundance and postprandial appearance of MCTs may provide advantageous metabolic responses in children and adults. UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AND REGISTRY: U1111-1209-7768; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=375324.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9846784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98467842023-01-19 Postprandial lipemic response in dairy-avoiding females following an equal volume of sheep milk relative to cow milk: A randomized controlled trial Teng, Fei Samuelsson, Linda M. Milan, Amber Marie Subbaraj, Arvind Agnew, Michael Shrestha, Aahana Cameron-Smith, David Day, Li Front Nutr Nutrition BACKGROUND: Sheep milk (SM) is an alternate dairy source, which despite many similarities, has both compositional and structural differences in lipids compared to cow milk (CM). Studies are yet to examine the apparent digestibility of SM lipids, relative to CM, and the potential impact on the plasma lipidome. OBJECTIVE: To determine the response of the circulatory lipidome to equal volume servings of SM and CM, in females who avoid dairy products. METHOD: In a double-blinded, randomized, cross-over trial, self-described dairy avoiding females (n = 30; 24.4 ± 1.1 years) drank SM or CM (650 mL; 33.4 vs. 21.3 g total lipid content; reconstituted from spray dried milk powders) following an overnight fast. Blood samples were collected at fasting and at regular intervals over 4 h after milk consumption. The plasma lipidome was analyzed by LC-MS and fatty acids were quantified by GC-FID. RESULTS: The overall postprandial triglyceride (TG) response was similar between SM and CM. TG concentrations were comparable at fasting for both groups, however they were higher after CM consumption at 30 min (interaction milk × time p = 0.003), well before any postprandial lipemic response. This was despite greater quantities provided by SM. However, there were notable differences in the postprandial fatty acid response, with SM leading to an increase in short- and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) (C6:0, C8:0, and C10:0) and several long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) (C18:1 t11, c9, t11-CLA, and C20:0; interaction time × milk p < 0.05). This corresponded to a greater postprandial response for medium chain triglycerides (MCTs) C10:0, including TG(10:0/14:0/18:1), TG(16:0/10:0/12:0), and TG(16:0/10:0/14:0) (interaction time × milk p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher fat content, SM ingestion resulted in a greater circulating abundance of MCTs, without increasing total postprandial triglyceride response, when compared to CM. The greater abundance and postprandial appearance of MCTs may provide advantageous metabolic responses in children and adults. UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AND REGISTRY: U1111-1209-7768; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=375324. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9846784/ /pubmed/36687710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1029813 Text en Copyright © 2023 Teng, Samuelsson, Milan, Subbaraj, Agnew, Shrestha, Cameron-Smith and Day. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Teng, Fei
Samuelsson, Linda M.
Milan, Amber Marie
Subbaraj, Arvind
Agnew, Michael
Shrestha, Aahana
Cameron-Smith, David
Day, Li
Postprandial lipemic response in dairy-avoiding females following an equal volume of sheep milk relative to cow milk: A randomized controlled trial
title Postprandial lipemic response in dairy-avoiding females following an equal volume of sheep milk relative to cow milk: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Postprandial lipemic response in dairy-avoiding females following an equal volume of sheep milk relative to cow milk: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Postprandial lipemic response in dairy-avoiding females following an equal volume of sheep milk relative to cow milk: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Postprandial lipemic response in dairy-avoiding females following an equal volume of sheep milk relative to cow milk: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Postprandial lipemic response in dairy-avoiding females following an equal volume of sheep milk relative to cow milk: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort postprandial lipemic response in dairy-avoiding females following an equal volume of sheep milk relative to cow milk: a randomized controlled trial
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36687710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1029813
work_keys_str_mv AT tengfei postprandiallipemicresponseindairyavoidingfemalesfollowinganequalvolumeofsheepmilkrelativetocowmilkarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT samuelssonlindam postprandiallipemicresponseindairyavoidingfemalesfollowinganequalvolumeofsheepmilkrelativetocowmilkarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT milanambermarie postprandiallipemicresponseindairyavoidingfemalesfollowinganequalvolumeofsheepmilkrelativetocowmilkarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT subbarajarvind postprandiallipemicresponseindairyavoidingfemalesfollowinganequalvolumeofsheepmilkrelativetocowmilkarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT agnewmichael postprandiallipemicresponseindairyavoidingfemalesfollowinganequalvolumeofsheepmilkrelativetocowmilkarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shresthaaahana postprandiallipemicresponseindairyavoidingfemalesfollowinganequalvolumeofsheepmilkrelativetocowmilkarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cameronsmithdavid postprandiallipemicresponseindairyavoidingfemalesfollowinganequalvolumeofsheepmilkrelativetocowmilkarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dayli postprandiallipemicresponseindairyavoidingfemalesfollowinganequalvolumeofsheepmilkrelativetocowmilkarandomizedcontrolledtrial