Cargando…

Nutrition claims influence expectations about food attributes, attenuate activity in reward‐associated brain regions during tasting, but do not impact pleasantness

INTRODUCTION: Nutrition claims are one of the most common tools used to improve food decisions. Previous research has shown that nutrition claims impact expectations; however, their effects on perceived pleasantness, valuation, and their neural correlates are not well understood. These claims may ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rramani, Qëndresa, Barakat, Youssef, Jacob, George, Ohla, Kathrin, Lim, Shirley Xue Li, Schicker, Doris, Freiherr, Jessica, Saruco, Elodie, Pleger, Burkhard, Weber, Bernd, Schultz, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36511877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2828
_version_ 1784871501379403776
author Rramani, Qëndresa
Barakat, Youssef
Jacob, George
Ohla, Kathrin
Lim, Shirley Xue Li
Schicker, Doris
Freiherr, Jessica
Saruco, Elodie
Pleger, Burkhard
Weber, Bernd
Schultz, Johannes
author_facet Rramani, Qëndresa
Barakat, Youssef
Jacob, George
Ohla, Kathrin
Lim, Shirley Xue Li
Schicker, Doris
Freiherr, Jessica
Saruco, Elodie
Pleger, Burkhard
Weber, Bernd
Schultz, Johannes
author_sort Rramani, Qëndresa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Nutrition claims are one of the most common tools used to improve food decisions. Previous research has shown that nutrition claims impact expectations; however, their effects on perceived pleasantness, valuation, and their neural correlates are not well understood. These claims may have both intended and unintended effects on food perception and valuation, which may compromise their effect on food decisions. METHODS: We investigated the effects of nutrition claims on expectations, perceptions, and valuation of milk‐mix drinks in a behavioral (n = 110) and an fMRI (n = 39) study. In the behavioral study, we assessed the effects of a “fat‐reduced” and a “protein‐rich” nutrition claim on expected and perceived food attributes of otherwise equal food products. In the fMRI study, we investigated the effect of a “protein‐rich” claim on taste pleasantness perception and valuation, and on their neural correlates during tasting and swallowing. RESULTS: We found that both nutrition claims increased expected and perceived healthiness and decreased expected but not perceived taste pleasantness. The “protein‐rich” claim increased expected but not perceived satiating quality ratings, while the “fat‐reduced” claim decreased both expected and perceived satiating quality ratings. In the absence vs. presence of the “protein‐rich” claim, we observed an increased activity in a cluster extending to the left nucleus accumbens during tasting and an increased functional connectivity between this cluster and a cluster in right middle frontal gyrus during swallowing. CONCLUSION: Altogether, we found that nutrition claims impacted expectations and attenuated reward‐related responses during tasting but did not negatively affect perceived pleasantness. Our findings support highlighting the presence of nutrients with positive associations and exposure to foods with nutrition claims to increase their acceptance. Our study offers insights that may be valuable in designing and optimizing the use of nutrition claims.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9847625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98476252023-01-24 Nutrition claims influence expectations about food attributes, attenuate activity in reward‐associated brain regions during tasting, but do not impact pleasantness Rramani, Qëndresa Barakat, Youssef Jacob, George Ohla, Kathrin Lim, Shirley Xue Li Schicker, Doris Freiherr, Jessica Saruco, Elodie Pleger, Burkhard Weber, Bernd Schultz, Johannes Brain Behav Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Nutrition claims are one of the most common tools used to improve food decisions. Previous research has shown that nutrition claims impact expectations; however, their effects on perceived pleasantness, valuation, and their neural correlates are not well understood. These claims may have both intended and unintended effects on food perception and valuation, which may compromise their effect on food decisions. METHODS: We investigated the effects of nutrition claims on expectations, perceptions, and valuation of milk‐mix drinks in a behavioral (n = 110) and an fMRI (n = 39) study. In the behavioral study, we assessed the effects of a “fat‐reduced” and a “protein‐rich” nutrition claim on expected and perceived food attributes of otherwise equal food products. In the fMRI study, we investigated the effect of a “protein‐rich” claim on taste pleasantness perception and valuation, and on their neural correlates during tasting and swallowing. RESULTS: We found that both nutrition claims increased expected and perceived healthiness and decreased expected but not perceived taste pleasantness. The “protein‐rich” claim increased expected but not perceived satiating quality ratings, while the “fat‐reduced” claim decreased both expected and perceived satiating quality ratings. In the absence vs. presence of the “protein‐rich” claim, we observed an increased activity in a cluster extending to the left nucleus accumbens during tasting and an increased functional connectivity between this cluster and a cluster in right middle frontal gyrus during swallowing. CONCLUSION: Altogether, we found that nutrition claims impacted expectations and attenuated reward‐related responses during tasting but did not negatively affect perceived pleasantness. Our findings support highlighting the presence of nutrients with positive associations and exposure to foods with nutrition claims to increase their acceptance. Our study offers insights that may be valuable in designing and optimizing the use of nutrition claims. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9847625/ /pubmed/36511877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2828 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rramani, Qëndresa
Barakat, Youssef
Jacob, George
Ohla, Kathrin
Lim, Shirley Xue Li
Schicker, Doris
Freiherr, Jessica
Saruco, Elodie
Pleger, Burkhard
Weber, Bernd
Schultz, Johannes
Nutrition claims influence expectations about food attributes, attenuate activity in reward‐associated brain regions during tasting, but do not impact pleasantness
title Nutrition claims influence expectations about food attributes, attenuate activity in reward‐associated brain regions during tasting, but do not impact pleasantness
title_full Nutrition claims influence expectations about food attributes, attenuate activity in reward‐associated brain regions during tasting, but do not impact pleasantness
title_fullStr Nutrition claims influence expectations about food attributes, attenuate activity in reward‐associated brain regions during tasting, but do not impact pleasantness
title_full_unstemmed Nutrition claims influence expectations about food attributes, attenuate activity in reward‐associated brain regions during tasting, but do not impact pleasantness
title_short Nutrition claims influence expectations about food attributes, attenuate activity in reward‐associated brain regions during tasting, but do not impact pleasantness
title_sort nutrition claims influence expectations about food attributes, attenuate activity in reward‐associated brain regions during tasting, but do not impact pleasantness
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36511877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2828
work_keys_str_mv AT rramaniqendresa nutritionclaimsinfluenceexpectationsaboutfoodattributesattenuateactivityinrewardassociatedbrainregionsduringtastingbutdonotimpactpleasantness
AT barakatyoussef nutritionclaimsinfluenceexpectationsaboutfoodattributesattenuateactivityinrewardassociatedbrainregionsduringtastingbutdonotimpactpleasantness
AT jacobgeorge nutritionclaimsinfluenceexpectationsaboutfoodattributesattenuateactivityinrewardassociatedbrainregionsduringtastingbutdonotimpactpleasantness
AT ohlakathrin nutritionclaimsinfluenceexpectationsaboutfoodattributesattenuateactivityinrewardassociatedbrainregionsduringtastingbutdonotimpactpleasantness
AT limshirleyxueli nutritionclaimsinfluenceexpectationsaboutfoodattributesattenuateactivityinrewardassociatedbrainregionsduringtastingbutdonotimpactpleasantness
AT schickerdoris nutritionclaimsinfluenceexpectationsaboutfoodattributesattenuateactivityinrewardassociatedbrainregionsduringtastingbutdonotimpactpleasantness
AT freiherrjessica nutritionclaimsinfluenceexpectationsaboutfoodattributesattenuateactivityinrewardassociatedbrainregionsduringtastingbutdonotimpactpleasantness
AT sarucoelodie nutritionclaimsinfluenceexpectationsaboutfoodattributesattenuateactivityinrewardassociatedbrainregionsduringtastingbutdonotimpactpleasantness
AT plegerburkhard nutritionclaimsinfluenceexpectationsaboutfoodattributesattenuateactivityinrewardassociatedbrainregionsduringtastingbutdonotimpactpleasantness
AT weberbernd nutritionclaimsinfluenceexpectationsaboutfoodattributesattenuateactivityinrewardassociatedbrainregionsduringtastingbutdonotimpactpleasantness
AT schultzjohannes nutritionclaimsinfluenceexpectationsaboutfoodattributesattenuateactivityinrewardassociatedbrainregionsduringtastingbutdonotimpactpleasantness