Improving therapeutic synergy score predictions with adverse effects using multi-task heterogeneous network learning

Drug combinations could trigger pharmacological therapeutic effects (TEs) and adverse effects (AEs). Many computational methods have been developed to predict TEs, e.g. the therapeutic synergy scores of anti-cancer drug combinations, or AEs from drug–drug interactions. However, most of the methods treated the AEs and TEs predictions as two separate tasks, ignoring the potential mechanistic commonalities shared between them. Based on previous clinical observations, we hypothesized that by learning the shared mechanistic commonalities between AEs and TEs, we could learn the underlying MoAs (mechanisms of actions) and ultimately improve the accuracy of TE predictions. To test our hypothesis, we formulated the TE prediction problem as a multi-task heterogeneous network learning problem that performed TE and AE learning tasks simultaneously. To solve this problem, we proposed Muthene (multi-task heterogeneous network embedding) and evaluated it on our collected drug–drug interaction dataset with both TEs and AEs indications. Our experimental results showed that, by including the AE prediction as an auxiliary task, Muthene generated more accurate TE predictions than standard single-task learning methods, which supports our hypothesis. Using a drug pair Vincristine—Dasatinib as a case study, we demonstrated that our method not only provides a novel way of TE predictions but also helps us gain a deeper understanding of the MoAs of drug combinations.