Cargando…

Should Carbohydrate Intake Be More Liberal during Oral and Enteral Nutrition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients?

Carbohydrate (CHO) intake in oral and enteral nutrition is regularly reduced in nutritional support of older patients due to the high prevalence of diabetes (usually type 2—T2DM) in this age group. However, CHO shortage can lead to the lack of building blocks necessary for tissue regeneration and ot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sobotka, Ondrej, Ticha, Marie, Kubickova, Marketa, Adamek, Petr, Polakova, Lenka, Mezera, Vojtech, Sobotka, Lubos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36678311
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020439
_version_ 1784875392098631680
author Sobotka, Ondrej
Ticha, Marie
Kubickova, Marketa
Adamek, Petr
Polakova, Lenka
Mezera, Vojtech
Sobotka, Lubos
author_facet Sobotka, Ondrej
Ticha, Marie
Kubickova, Marketa
Adamek, Petr
Polakova, Lenka
Mezera, Vojtech
Sobotka, Lubos
author_sort Sobotka, Ondrej
collection PubMed
description Carbohydrate (CHO) intake in oral and enteral nutrition is regularly reduced in nutritional support of older patients due to the high prevalence of diabetes (usually type 2—T2DM) in this age group. However, CHO shortage can lead to the lack of building blocks necessary for tissue regeneration and other anabolic processes. Moreover, low CHO intake decreases CHO oxidation and can increase insulin resistance. The aim of our current study was to determine the extent to which an increased intake of a rapidly digestible carbohydrate—maltodextrin—affects blood glucose levels monitored continuously for one week in patients with and without T2DM. Twenty-one patients (14 T2DM and seven without diabetes) were studied for two weeks. During the first week, patients with T2DM received standard diabetic nutrition (250 g CHO per day) and patients without diabetes received a standard diet (350 g of CHO per day). During the second week, the daily CHO intake was increased to 400 in T2DM and 500 g in nondiabetic patients by addition of 150 g maltodextrin divided into three equal doses of 50 g and given immediately after the main meal. Plasma glucose level was monitored continually with the help of a subcutaneous sensor during both weeks. The increased CHO intake led to transient postprandial increase of glucose levels in T2DM patients. This rise was more manifest during the first three days of CHO intake, and then the postprandial peak hyperglycemia was blunted. During the night’s fasting period, the glucose levels were not influenced by maltodextrin. Supplementation of additional CHO did not influence the percentual range of high glucose level and decreased a risk of hypoglycaemia. No change in T2DM treatment was indicated. The results confirm our assumption that increased CHO intake as an alternative to CHO restriction in type 2 diabetic patients during oral and enteral nutritional support is safe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9863670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98636702023-01-22 Should Carbohydrate Intake Be More Liberal during Oral and Enteral Nutrition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients? Sobotka, Ondrej Ticha, Marie Kubickova, Marketa Adamek, Petr Polakova, Lenka Mezera, Vojtech Sobotka, Lubos Nutrients Article Carbohydrate (CHO) intake in oral and enteral nutrition is regularly reduced in nutritional support of older patients due to the high prevalence of diabetes (usually type 2—T2DM) in this age group. However, CHO shortage can lead to the lack of building blocks necessary for tissue regeneration and other anabolic processes. Moreover, low CHO intake decreases CHO oxidation and can increase insulin resistance. The aim of our current study was to determine the extent to which an increased intake of a rapidly digestible carbohydrate—maltodextrin—affects blood glucose levels monitored continuously for one week in patients with and without T2DM. Twenty-one patients (14 T2DM and seven without diabetes) were studied for two weeks. During the first week, patients with T2DM received standard diabetic nutrition (250 g CHO per day) and patients without diabetes received a standard diet (350 g of CHO per day). During the second week, the daily CHO intake was increased to 400 in T2DM and 500 g in nondiabetic patients by addition of 150 g maltodextrin divided into three equal doses of 50 g and given immediately after the main meal. Plasma glucose level was monitored continually with the help of a subcutaneous sensor during both weeks. The increased CHO intake led to transient postprandial increase of glucose levels in T2DM patients. This rise was more manifest during the first three days of CHO intake, and then the postprandial peak hyperglycemia was blunted. During the night’s fasting period, the glucose levels were not influenced by maltodextrin. Supplementation of additional CHO did not influence the percentual range of high glucose level and decreased a risk of hypoglycaemia. No change in T2DM treatment was indicated. The results confirm our assumption that increased CHO intake as an alternative to CHO restriction in type 2 diabetic patients during oral and enteral nutritional support is safe. MDPI 2023-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9863670/ /pubmed/36678311 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020439 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sobotka, Ondrej
Ticha, Marie
Kubickova, Marketa
Adamek, Petr
Polakova, Lenka
Mezera, Vojtech
Sobotka, Lubos
Should Carbohydrate Intake Be More Liberal during Oral and Enteral Nutrition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients?
title Should Carbohydrate Intake Be More Liberal during Oral and Enteral Nutrition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients?
title_full Should Carbohydrate Intake Be More Liberal during Oral and Enteral Nutrition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients?
title_fullStr Should Carbohydrate Intake Be More Liberal during Oral and Enteral Nutrition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients?
title_full_unstemmed Should Carbohydrate Intake Be More Liberal during Oral and Enteral Nutrition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients?
title_short Should Carbohydrate Intake Be More Liberal during Oral and Enteral Nutrition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients?
title_sort should carbohydrate intake be more liberal during oral and enteral nutrition in type 2 diabetic patients?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36678311
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020439
work_keys_str_mv AT sobotkaondrej shouldcarbohydrateintakebemoreliberalduringoralandenteralnutritionintype2diabeticpatients
AT tichamarie shouldcarbohydrateintakebemoreliberalduringoralandenteralnutritionintype2diabeticpatients
AT kubickovamarketa shouldcarbohydrateintakebemoreliberalduringoralandenteralnutritionintype2diabeticpatients
AT adamekpetr shouldcarbohydrateintakebemoreliberalduringoralandenteralnutritionintype2diabeticpatients
AT polakovalenka shouldcarbohydrateintakebemoreliberalduringoralandenteralnutritionintype2diabeticpatients
AT mezeravojtech shouldcarbohydrateintakebemoreliberalduringoralandenteralnutritionintype2diabeticpatients
AT sobotkalubos shouldcarbohydrateintakebemoreliberalduringoralandenteralnutritionintype2diabeticpatients