Cargando…

A mixed-methods evaluation of unconscious racial bias training for NHS senior practitioners to improve the experiences of racially minoritised students

OBJECTIVE: The degree awarding gap indicates that racially minoritised higher education students receive lower degree classifications relative to their white peers. While the reasons for this are complex, research suggests that educator and practitioner attitudes and behaviour towards racially minor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pennington, Charlotte R., Bliss, Eleanore, Airey, Alisha, Bancroft, Mandy, Pryce-Miller, Maxine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36669838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068819
_version_ 1784877409849311232
author Pennington, Charlotte R.
Bliss, Eleanore
Airey, Alisha
Bancroft, Mandy
Pryce-Miller, Maxine
author_facet Pennington, Charlotte R.
Bliss, Eleanore
Airey, Alisha
Bancroft, Mandy
Pryce-Miller, Maxine
author_sort Pennington, Charlotte R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The degree awarding gap indicates that racially minoritised higher education students receive lower degree classifications relative to their white peers. While the reasons for this are complex, research suggests that educator and practitioner attitudes and behaviour towards racially minoritised students are a significant contributing factor. This preregistered study evaluates the effectiveness of unconscious racial bias training (URBT) to enhance National Health Service senior practitioner’s recognition of how racial inequalities negatively impact racially minoritised students. DESIGN: A mixed-methods study with a pretest and post-test design was conducted in the higher education and healthcare practice environment. METHODS: Forty-nine NHS senior practitioners completed a 4-hour URBT workshop with activities focusing on activating stereotypes, exploring differences between unconscious and implicit bias, discussing the development of bias, and reflecting on student experiences of prejudice, harassment and discrimination. They completed pre- and post- quantitative measures that assessed the effectiveness of URBT and changes in racial competency, awareness and perceptions of unconscious racial bias. Qualitative measures explored the usefulness and perceived applications of URBT, and a 1-month follow-up assessed further how it had been applied within practice. RESULTS: Participants reported positive evaluations of URBT, higher perceived racial competency, awareness and perceptions of racial bias (ps<0.001, dz>0.35). After 1 month, key themes from qualitative responses suggested that participants had increased self-awareness and were exploring how to set up mentoring and working groups, change recruitment and progression processes, and diversify the taught curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: URBT may be one effective strategy to enhance awareness and encourage reflections of racial bias. We discuss how reducing racial inequalities requires a multifaceted approach that affords upfront conversations about systemic racism, implements effective initiatives, policies and procedures, and engages in continuous evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9872466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98724662023-01-25 A mixed-methods evaluation of unconscious racial bias training for NHS senior practitioners to improve the experiences of racially minoritised students Pennington, Charlotte R. Bliss, Eleanore Airey, Alisha Bancroft, Mandy Pryce-Miller, Maxine BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVE: The degree awarding gap indicates that racially minoritised higher education students receive lower degree classifications relative to their white peers. While the reasons for this are complex, research suggests that educator and practitioner attitudes and behaviour towards racially minoritised students are a significant contributing factor. This preregistered study evaluates the effectiveness of unconscious racial bias training (URBT) to enhance National Health Service senior practitioner’s recognition of how racial inequalities negatively impact racially minoritised students. DESIGN: A mixed-methods study with a pretest and post-test design was conducted in the higher education and healthcare practice environment. METHODS: Forty-nine NHS senior practitioners completed a 4-hour URBT workshop with activities focusing on activating stereotypes, exploring differences between unconscious and implicit bias, discussing the development of bias, and reflecting on student experiences of prejudice, harassment and discrimination. They completed pre- and post- quantitative measures that assessed the effectiveness of URBT and changes in racial competency, awareness and perceptions of unconscious racial bias. Qualitative measures explored the usefulness and perceived applications of URBT, and a 1-month follow-up assessed further how it had been applied within practice. RESULTS: Participants reported positive evaluations of URBT, higher perceived racial competency, awareness and perceptions of racial bias (ps<0.001, dz>0.35). After 1 month, key themes from qualitative responses suggested that participants had increased self-awareness and were exploring how to set up mentoring and working groups, change recruitment and progression processes, and diversify the taught curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: URBT may be one effective strategy to enhance awareness and encourage reflections of racial bias. We discuss how reducing racial inequalities requires a multifaceted approach that affords upfront conversations about systemic racism, implements effective initiatives, policies and procedures, and engages in continuous evaluation. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9872466/ /pubmed/36669838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068819 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Policy
Pennington, Charlotte R.
Bliss, Eleanore
Airey, Alisha
Bancroft, Mandy
Pryce-Miller, Maxine
A mixed-methods evaluation of unconscious racial bias training for NHS senior practitioners to improve the experiences of racially minoritised students
title A mixed-methods evaluation of unconscious racial bias training for NHS senior practitioners to improve the experiences of racially minoritised students
title_full A mixed-methods evaluation of unconscious racial bias training for NHS senior practitioners to improve the experiences of racially minoritised students
title_fullStr A mixed-methods evaluation of unconscious racial bias training for NHS senior practitioners to improve the experiences of racially minoritised students
title_full_unstemmed A mixed-methods evaluation of unconscious racial bias training for NHS senior practitioners to improve the experiences of racially minoritised students
title_short A mixed-methods evaluation of unconscious racial bias training for NHS senior practitioners to improve the experiences of racially minoritised students
title_sort mixed-methods evaluation of unconscious racial bias training for nhs senior practitioners to improve the experiences of racially minoritised students
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36669838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068819
work_keys_str_mv AT penningtoncharlotter amixedmethodsevaluationofunconsciousracialbiastrainingfornhsseniorpractitionerstoimprovetheexperiencesofraciallyminoritisedstudents
AT blisseleanore amixedmethodsevaluationofunconsciousracialbiastrainingfornhsseniorpractitionerstoimprovetheexperiencesofraciallyminoritisedstudents
AT aireyalisha amixedmethodsevaluationofunconsciousracialbiastrainingfornhsseniorpractitionerstoimprovetheexperiencesofraciallyminoritisedstudents
AT bancroftmandy amixedmethodsevaluationofunconsciousracialbiastrainingfornhsseniorpractitionerstoimprovetheexperiencesofraciallyminoritisedstudents
AT prycemillermaxine amixedmethodsevaluationofunconsciousracialbiastrainingfornhsseniorpractitionerstoimprovetheexperiencesofraciallyminoritisedstudents
AT penningtoncharlotter mixedmethodsevaluationofunconsciousracialbiastrainingfornhsseniorpractitionerstoimprovetheexperiencesofraciallyminoritisedstudents
AT blisseleanore mixedmethodsevaluationofunconsciousracialbiastrainingfornhsseniorpractitionerstoimprovetheexperiencesofraciallyminoritisedstudents
AT aireyalisha mixedmethodsevaluationofunconsciousracialbiastrainingfornhsseniorpractitionerstoimprovetheexperiencesofraciallyminoritisedstudents
AT bancroftmandy mixedmethodsevaluationofunconsciousracialbiastrainingfornhsseniorpractitionerstoimprovetheexperiencesofraciallyminoritisedstudents
AT prycemillermaxine mixedmethodsevaluationofunconsciousracialbiastrainingfornhsseniorpractitionerstoimprovetheexperiencesofraciallyminoritisedstudents