Cargando…
Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy
Blended Learning (BL) as a pedagogical approach has increased in significance during the COVID-19 pandemic, with blended and online learning environments becoming the new digital norm for higher educational institutions around the globe. While BL has been discussed in the literature for thirty years...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09354-5 |
_version_ | 1784877466232291328 |
---|---|
author | Sutherland, Karen Brock, Ginna de Villiers Scheepers, Margarietha. J. Millear, Prudence M. Norman, Sherelle Strohfeldt, Tim Downer, Terri Masters, Nicole Black, Alison. L. |
author_facet | Sutherland, Karen Brock, Ginna de Villiers Scheepers, Margarietha. J. Millear, Prudence M. Norman, Sherelle Strohfeldt, Tim Downer, Terri Masters, Nicole Black, Alison. L. |
author_sort | Sutherland, Karen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Blended Learning (BL) as a pedagogical approach has increased in significance during the COVID-19 pandemic, with blended and online learning environments becoming the new digital norm for higher educational institutions around the globe. While BL has been discussed in the literature for thirty years, a common approach has been to categorise learner cohorts to support educators in better understanding students’ relationships with learning technologies. This approach, largely unsupported by empirical evidence, has failed to adequately address the challenges of integrating learning technologies to fit with non-traditional students’ preferences, their BL self-efficacy and the associated pedagogical implications. Focusing on student preference, our study presents findings from a pre-COVID survey of undergraduate students across four campuses of an Australian regional university where students shared their learning technology preferences and the self-regulated learning that influenced their academic self-efficacy in a BL context. Findings show students want consistency, relevance, and effectiveness with the use of BL tools, with a preference for lecture recordings and video resources to support their learning, while email and Facebook Messenger were preferred for communicating with peers and academic staff. Our study suggests a quality BL environment facilitates self-regulated learning using fit-for-purpose technological applications. Academic self-efficacy for BL can increase when students perceive the educational technologies used by their institution are sufficient for their learning needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9872746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98727462023-01-25 Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy Sutherland, Karen Brock, Ginna de Villiers Scheepers, Margarietha. J. Millear, Prudence M. Norman, Sherelle Strohfeldt, Tim Downer, Terri Masters, Nicole Black, Alison. L. J Comput High Educ Article Blended Learning (BL) as a pedagogical approach has increased in significance during the COVID-19 pandemic, with blended and online learning environments becoming the new digital norm for higher educational institutions around the globe. While BL has been discussed in the literature for thirty years, a common approach has been to categorise learner cohorts to support educators in better understanding students’ relationships with learning technologies. This approach, largely unsupported by empirical evidence, has failed to adequately address the challenges of integrating learning technologies to fit with non-traditional students’ preferences, their BL self-efficacy and the associated pedagogical implications. Focusing on student preference, our study presents findings from a pre-COVID survey of undergraduate students across four campuses of an Australian regional university where students shared their learning technology preferences and the self-regulated learning that influenced their academic self-efficacy in a BL context. Findings show students want consistency, relevance, and effectiveness with the use of BL tools, with a preference for lecture recordings and video resources to support their learning, while email and Facebook Messenger were preferred for communicating with peers and academic staff. Our study suggests a quality BL environment facilitates self-regulated learning using fit-for-purpose technological applications. Academic self-efficacy for BL can increase when students perceive the educational technologies used by their institution are sufficient for their learning needs. Springer US 2023-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9872746/ /pubmed/36714819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09354-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Sutherland, Karen Brock, Ginna de Villiers Scheepers, Margarietha. J. Millear, Prudence M. Norman, Sherelle Strohfeldt, Tim Downer, Terri Masters, Nicole Black, Alison. L. Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy |
title | Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy |
title_full | Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy |
title_fullStr | Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy |
title_short | Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy |
title_sort | non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09354-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sutherlandkaren nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy AT brockginna nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy AT devilliersscheepersmargariethaj nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy AT millearprudencem nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy AT normansherelle nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy AT strohfeldttim nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy AT downerterri nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy AT mastersnicole nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy AT blackalisonl nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy |