Cargando…

Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy

Blended Learning (BL) as a pedagogical approach has increased in significance during the COVID-19 pandemic, with blended and online learning environments becoming the new digital norm for higher educational institutions around the globe. While BL has been discussed in the literature for thirty years...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sutherland, Karen, Brock, Ginna, de Villiers Scheepers, Margarietha. J., Millear, Prudence M., Norman, Sherelle, Strohfeldt, Tim, Downer, Terri, Masters, Nicole, Black, Alison. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09354-5
_version_ 1784877466232291328
author Sutherland, Karen
Brock, Ginna
de Villiers Scheepers, Margarietha. J.
Millear, Prudence M.
Norman, Sherelle
Strohfeldt, Tim
Downer, Terri
Masters, Nicole
Black, Alison. L.
author_facet Sutherland, Karen
Brock, Ginna
de Villiers Scheepers, Margarietha. J.
Millear, Prudence M.
Norman, Sherelle
Strohfeldt, Tim
Downer, Terri
Masters, Nicole
Black, Alison. L.
author_sort Sutherland, Karen
collection PubMed
description Blended Learning (BL) as a pedagogical approach has increased in significance during the COVID-19 pandemic, with blended and online learning environments becoming the new digital norm for higher educational institutions around the globe. While BL has been discussed in the literature for thirty years, a common approach has been to categorise learner cohorts to support educators in better understanding students’ relationships with learning technologies. This approach, largely unsupported by empirical evidence, has failed to adequately address the challenges of integrating learning technologies to fit with non-traditional students’ preferences, their BL self-efficacy and the associated pedagogical implications. Focusing on student preference, our study presents findings from a pre-COVID survey of undergraduate students across four campuses of an Australian regional university where students shared their learning technology preferences and the self-regulated learning that influenced their academic self-efficacy in a BL context. Findings show students want consistency, relevance, and effectiveness with the use of BL tools, with a preference for lecture recordings and video resources to support their learning, while email and Facebook Messenger were preferred for communicating with peers and academic staff. Our study suggests a quality BL environment facilitates self-regulated learning using fit-for-purpose technological applications. Academic self-efficacy for BL can increase when students perceive the educational technologies used by their institution are sufficient for their learning needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9872746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98727462023-01-25 Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy Sutherland, Karen Brock, Ginna de Villiers Scheepers, Margarietha. J. Millear, Prudence M. Norman, Sherelle Strohfeldt, Tim Downer, Terri Masters, Nicole Black, Alison. L. J Comput High Educ Article Blended Learning (BL) as a pedagogical approach has increased in significance during the COVID-19 pandemic, with blended and online learning environments becoming the new digital norm for higher educational institutions around the globe. While BL has been discussed in the literature for thirty years, a common approach has been to categorise learner cohorts to support educators in better understanding students’ relationships with learning technologies. This approach, largely unsupported by empirical evidence, has failed to adequately address the challenges of integrating learning technologies to fit with non-traditional students’ preferences, their BL self-efficacy and the associated pedagogical implications. Focusing on student preference, our study presents findings from a pre-COVID survey of undergraduate students across four campuses of an Australian regional university where students shared their learning technology preferences and the self-regulated learning that influenced their academic self-efficacy in a BL context. Findings show students want consistency, relevance, and effectiveness with the use of BL tools, with a preference for lecture recordings and video resources to support their learning, while email and Facebook Messenger were preferred for communicating with peers and academic staff. Our study suggests a quality BL environment facilitates self-regulated learning using fit-for-purpose technological applications. Academic self-efficacy for BL can increase when students perceive the educational technologies used by their institution are sufficient for their learning needs. Springer US 2023-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9872746/ /pubmed/36714819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09354-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sutherland, Karen
Brock, Ginna
de Villiers Scheepers, Margarietha. J.
Millear, Prudence M.
Norman, Sherelle
Strohfeldt, Tim
Downer, Terri
Masters, Nicole
Black, Alison. L.
Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy
title Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy
title_full Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy
title_fullStr Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy
title_short Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy
title_sort non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09354-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sutherlandkaren nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy
AT brockginna nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy
AT devilliersscheepersmargariethaj nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy
AT millearprudencem nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy
AT normansherelle nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy
AT strohfeldttim nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy
AT downerterri nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy
AT mastersnicole nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy
AT blackalisonl nontraditionalstudentspreferencesforlearningtechnologiesandimpactsonacademicselfefficacy