Cargando…
The clinical and genomic distinctions of Class1/2/3 BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer and differential prognoses
BRAF mutations are the oncogenic drivers in colorectal cancer and V600 mutations (Class1), which lead to RAS-independent active monomers, are the most common mutation types. BRAF non-V600 mutants can be further classified as RAS-independent active dimers (Class2) and RAS-dependent impaired kinase (C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40364-022-00443-8 |
_version_ | 1784877962014752768 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yungchang Sun, Hao Deng, Yanhong Ma, Yutong Huang, He Liu, Yang Zhang, Yaru Zhang, Hongyu Ye, Sheng E, Mingyan Guo, Hongqiang Wu, Mengmeng Wu, Chunman Pu, Xingxiang Chen, Xinggui Liang, Chaoyong Ou, Qiuxiang Weng, Huawei Wu, Xue Shao, Yang Gu, Anxin Lin, Tongyu |
author_facet | Chen, Yungchang Sun, Hao Deng, Yanhong Ma, Yutong Huang, He Liu, Yang Zhang, Yaru Zhang, Hongyu Ye, Sheng E, Mingyan Guo, Hongqiang Wu, Mengmeng Wu, Chunman Pu, Xingxiang Chen, Xinggui Liang, Chaoyong Ou, Qiuxiang Weng, Huawei Wu, Xue Shao, Yang Gu, Anxin Lin, Tongyu |
author_sort | Chen, Yungchang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BRAF mutations are the oncogenic drivers in colorectal cancer and V600 mutations (Class1), which lead to RAS-independent active monomers, are the most common mutation types. BRAF non-V600 mutants can be further classified as RAS-independent active dimers (Class2) and RAS-dependent impaired kinase (Class3). We retrospectively reviewed the mutational profiles of 328 treatment-naïve colorectal tumors with BRAF mutations detected using capture-based hybrid next-generation sequencing targeting 400 + cancer-related genes. The clinical and genetic distinctions of patients harboring Class1/2/3 BRAF mutations were investigated, which revealed that tumors with Class1 BRAF mutations showed more unique genomic profiles than those with Class2/3 mutations. Also, by using an external dataset from cBioPortal, we demonstrated that patients with Class3 BRAF mutations had the best survival outcomes compared to the other two subgroups. These findings promoted the development of anti-BRAF strategies by distinguishing BRAF mutant subgroups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40364-022-00443-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9875443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98754432023-01-26 The clinical and genomic distinctions of Class1/2/3 BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer and differential prognoses Chen, Yungchang Sun, Hao Deng, Yanhong Ma, Yutong Huang, He Liu, Yang Zhang, Yaru Zhang, Hongyu Ye, Sheng E, Mingyan Guo, Hongqiang Wu, Mengmeng Wu, Chunman Pu, Xingxiang Chen, Xinggui Liang, Chaoyong Ou, Qiuxiang Weng, Huawei Wu, Xue Shao, Yang Gu, Anxin Lin, Tongyu Biomark Res Correspondence BRAF mutations are the oncogenic drivers in colorectal cancer and V600 mutations (Class1), which lead to RAS-independent active monomers, are the most common mutation types. BRAF non-V600 mutants can be further classified as RAS-independent active dimers (Class2) and RAS-dependent impaired kinase (Class3). We retrospectively reviewed the mutational profiles of 328 treatment-naïve colorectal tumors with BRAF mutations detected using capture-based hybrid next-generation sequencing targeting 400 + cancer-related genes. The clinical and genetic distinctions of patients harboring Class1/2/3 BRAF mutations were investigated, which revealed that tumors with Class1 BRAF mutations showed more unique genomic profiles than those with Class2/3 mutations. Also, by using an external dataset from cBioPortal, we demonstrated that patients with Class3 BRAF mutations had the best survival outcomes compared to the other two subgroups. These findings promoted the development of anti-BRAF strategies by distinguishing BRAF mutant subgroups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40364-022-00443-8. BioMed Central 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9875443/ /pubmed/36694231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40364-022-00443-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Chen, Yungchang Sun, Hao Deng, Yanhong Ma, Yutong Huang, He Liu, Yang Zhang, Yaru Zhang, Hongyu Ye, Sheng E, Mingyan Guo, Hongqiang Wu, Mengmeng Wu, Chunman Pu, Xingxiang Chen, Xinggui Liang, Chaoyong Ou, Qiuxiang Weng, Huawei Wu, Xue Shao, Yang Gu, Anxin Lin, Tongyu The clinical and genomic distinctions of Class1/2/3 BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer and differential prognoses |
title | The clinical and genomic distinctions of Class1/2/3 BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer and differential prognoses |
title_full | The clinical and genomic distinctions of Class1/2/3 BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer and differential prognoses |
title_fullStr | The clinical and genomic distinctions of Class1/2/3 BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer and differential prognoses |
title_full_unstemmed | The clinical and genomic distinctions of Class1/2/3 BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer and differential prognoses |
title_short | The clinical and genomic distinctions of Class1/2/3 BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer and differential prognoses |
title_sort | clinical and genomic distinctions of class1/2/3 braf-mutant colorectal cancer and differential prognoses |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40364-022-00443-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyungchang theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT sunhao theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT dengyanhong theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT mayutong theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT huanghe theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT liuyang theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT zhangyaru theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT zhanghongyu theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT yesheng theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT emingyan theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT guohongqiang theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT wumengmeng theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT wuchunman theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT puxingxiang theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT chenxinggui theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT liangchaoyong theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT ouqiuxiang theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT wenghuawei theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT wuxue theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT shaoyang theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT guanxin theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT lintongyu theclinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT chenyungchang clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT sunhao clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT dengyanhong clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT mayutong clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT huanghe clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT liuyang clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT zhangyaru clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT zhanghongyu clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT yesheng clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT emingyan clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT guohongqiang clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT wumengmeng clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT wuchunman clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT puxingxiang clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT chenxinggui clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT liangchaoyong clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT ouqiuxiang clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT wenghuawei clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT wuxue clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT shaoyang clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT guanxin clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses AT lintongyu clinicalandgenomicdistinctionsofclass123brafmutantcolorectalcanceranddifferentialprognoses |