Cargando…
A systematic review of transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents: comparing the transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques
PURPOSE: Aim of this systematic review was to analyze the outcome after transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents regarding the femoral drilling technique. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in various databases on studies on transphyseal ACL reconstruction in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9877258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00577-0 |
_version_ | 1784878328270815232 |
---|---|
author | Petersen, Wolf Bierke, Sebastian Stöhr, Amelie Stoffels, Thomas Häner, Martin |
author_facet | Petersen, Wolf Bierke, Sebastian Stöhr, Amelie Stoffels, Thomas Häner, Martin |
author_sort | Petersen, Wolf |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Aim of this systematic review was to analyze the outcome after transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents regarding the femoral drilling technique. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in various databases on studies on transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents. The literature search was limited to the last 20 years. Primary outcome criterion was the failure rate. Secondary outcome criteria were growth disturbances such as leg length discrepancies or deformities and clinical scores. The present study was registered prospectively (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO; CRD42022345964). RESULTS: A total of 22 retrospective or prospective case series (level 4 evidence) were identified that reported on transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents. The overall failure/rupture rate after transphyseal ACL reconstruction was 11.0%. The overall ACL rupture rate of the contralateral side was 9.7%. No statistical significant difference in the failure rates between independent and transtibial drilling techniques could be detected ((p = 0.76/p = 0.28)). Furthermore no statistical significant differences in the rate of reported growth disturbances between independent and transtibial drilling techniques were shown (p = 0.15). The reported clinical scores at follow-up (mean follow-up 5.05 years) revealed good to very good results. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrates that children and adolescents have a relatively high failure rate after transpyseal ACL reconstruction without any statistically significant differences between independent or transtibial drilling techniques regarding reruptur rates or the rate of growth disturbances. The results of this systematic review warrant a comparison of both techniques for femoral tunnel drilling in a controlled randomized trial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9877258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98772582023-01-27 A systematic review of transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents: comparing the transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques Petersen, Wolf Bierke, Sebastian Stöhr, Amelie Stoffels, Thomas Häner, Martin J Exp Orthop Review Paper PURPOSE: Aim of this systematic review was to analyze the outcome after transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents regarding the femoral drilling technique. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in various databases on studies on transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents. The literature search was limited to the last 20 years. Primary outcome criterion was the failure rate. Secondary outcome criteria were growth disturbances such as leg length discrepancies or deformities and clinical scores. The present study was registered prospectively (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO; CRD42022345964). RESULTS: A total of 22 retrospective or prospective case series (level 4 evidence) were identified that reported on transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents. The overall failure/rupture rate after transphyseal ACL reconstruction was 11.0%. The overall ACL rupture rate of the contralateral side was 9.7%. No statistical significant difference in the failure rates between independent and transtibial drilling techniques could be detected ((p = 0.76/p = 0.28)). Furthermore no statistical significant differences in the rate of reported growth disturbances between independent and transtibial drilling techniques were shown (p = 0.15). The reported clinical scores at follow-up (mean follow-up 5.05 years) revealed good to very good results. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrates that children and adolescents have a relatively high failure rate after transpyseal ACL reconstruction without any statistically significant differences between independent or transtibial drilling techniques regarding reruptur rates or the rate of growth disturbances. The results of this systematic review warrant a comparison of both techniques for femoral tunnel drilling in a controlled randomized trial. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9877258/ /pubmed/36695820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00577-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Petersen, Wolf Bierke, Sebastian Stöhr, Amelie Stoffels, Thomas Häner, Martin A systematic review of transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents: comparing the transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques |
title | A systematic review of transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents: comparing the transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques |
title_full | A systematic review of transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents: comparing the transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents: comparing the transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents: comparing the transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques |
title_short | A systematic review of transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents: comparing the transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques |
title_sort | systematic review of transphyseal acl reconstruction in children and adolescents: comparing the transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9877258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00577-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersenwolf asystematicreviewoftransphysealaclreconstructioninchildrenandadolescentscomparingthetranstibialandindependentfemoraltunneldrillingtechniques AT bierkesebastian asystematicreviewoftransphysealaclreconstructioninchildrenandadolescentscomparingthetranstibialandindependentfemoraltunneldrillingtechniques AT stohramelie asystematicreviewoftransphysealaclreconstructioninchildrenandadolescentscomparingthetranstibialandindependentfemoraltunneldrillingtechniques AT stoffelsthomas asystematicreviewoftransphysealaclreconstructioninchildrenandadolescentscomparingthetranstibialandindependentfemoraltunneldrillingtechniques AT hanermartin asystematicreviewoftransphysealaclreconstructioninchildrenandadolescentscomparingthetranstibialandindependentfemoraltunneldrillingtechniques AT petersenwolf systematicreviewoftransphysealaclreconstructioninchildrenandadolescentscomparingthetranstibialandindependentfemoraltunneldrillingtechniques AT bierkesebastian systematicreviewoftransphysealaclreconstructioninchildrenandadolescentscomparingthetranstibialandindependentfemoraltunneldrillingtechniques AT stohramelie systematicreviewoftransphysealaclreconstructioninchildrenandadolescentscomparingthetranstibialandindependentfemoraltunneldrillingtechniques AT stoffelsthomas systematicreviewoftransphysealaclreconstructioninchildrenandadolescentscomparingthetranstibialandindependentfemoraltunneldrillingtechniques AT hanermartin systematicreviewoftransphysealaclreconstructioninchildrenandadolescentscomparingthetranstibialandindependentfemoraltunneldrillingtechniques |