Cargando…
The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions
BACKGROUND: Soft, wearable, powered exoskeletons are novel devices that may assist rehabilitation, allowing users to walk further or carry out activities of daily living. However, soft robotic exoskeletons, and the more commonly used rigid exoskeletons, are not widely adopted clinically. The availab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36717869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01122-3 |
_version_ | 1784879923181125632 |
---|---|
author | Morris, Leah Diteesawat, Richard S. Rahman, Nahian Turton, Ailie Cramp, Mary Rossiter, Jonathan |
author_facet | Morris, Leah Diteesawat, Richard S. Rahman, Nahian Turton, Ailie Cramp, Mary Rossiter, Jonathan |
author_sort | Morris, Leah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Soft, wearable, powered exoskeletons are novel devices that may assist rehabilitation, allowing users to walk further or carry out activities of daily living. However, soft robotic exoskeletons, and the more commonly used rigid exoskeletons, are not widely adopted clinically. The available evidence highlights a disconnect between the needs of exoskeleton users and the engineers designing devices. This review aimed to explore the literature on physiotherapist and patient perspectives of the longer-standing, and therefore greater evidenced, rigid exoskeleton limitations. It then offered potential solutions to these limitations, including soft robotics, from an engineering standpoint. METHODS: A state-of-the-art review was carried out which included both qualitative and quantitative research papers regarding patient and/or physiotherapist perspectives of rigid exoskeletons. Papers were themed and themes formed the review’s framework. RESULTS: Six main themes regarding the limitations of soft exoskeletons were important to physiotherapists and patients: safety; a one-size-fits approach; ease of device use; weight and placement of device; cost of device; and, specific to patients only, appearance of the device. Potential soft-robotics solutions to address these limitations were offered, including compliant actuators, sensors, suit attachments fitting to user’s body, and the use of control algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: It is evident that current exoskeletons are not meeting the needs of their users. Solutions to the limitations offered may inform device development. However, the solutions are not infallible and thus further research and development is required. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-022-01122-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9885398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98853982023-01-30 The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions Morris, Leah Diteesawat, Richard S. Rahman, Nahian Turton, Ailie Cramp, Mary Rossiter, Jonathan J Neuroeng Rehabil Review BACKGROUND: Soft, wearable, powered exoskeletons are novel devices that may assist rehabilitation, allowing users to walk further or carry out activities of daily living. However, soft robotic exoskeletons, and the more commonly used rigid exoskeletons, are not widely adopted clinically. The available evidence highlights a disconnect between the needs of exoskeleton users and the engineers designing devices. This review aimed to explore the literature on physiotherapist and patient perspectives of the longer-standing, and therefore greater evidenced, rigid exoskeleton limitations. It then offered potential solutions to these limitations, including soft robotics, from an engineering standpoint. METHODS: A state-of-the-art review was carried out which included both qualitative and quantitative research papers regarding patient and/or physiotherapist perspectives of rigid exoskeletons. Papers were themed and themes formed the review’s framework. RESULTS: Six main themes regarding the limitations of soft exoskeletons were important to physiotherapists and patients: safety; a one-size-fits approach; ease of device use; weight and placement of device; cost of device; and, specific to patients only, appearance of the device. Potential soft-robotics solutions to address these limitations were offered, including compliant actuators, sensors, suit attachments fitting to user’s body, and the use of control algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: It is evident that current exoskeletons are not meeting the needs of their users. Solutions to the limitations offered may inform device development. However, the solutions are not infallible and thus further research and development is required. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-022-01122-3. BioMed Central 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9885398/ /pubmed/36717869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01122-3 Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Morris, Leah Diteesawat, Richard S. Rahman, Nahian Turton, Ailie Cramp, Mary Rossiter, Jonathan The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions |
title | The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions |
title_full | The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions |
title_fullStr | The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions |
title_full_unstemmed | The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions |
title_short | The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions |
title_sort | the-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36717869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01122-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morrisleah thestateoftheartofsoftroboticstoassistmobilityareviewofphysiotherapistandpatientidentifiedlimitationsofcurrentlowerlimbexoskeletonsandthepotentialsoftroboticsolutions AT diteesawatrichards thestateoftheartofsoftroboticstoassistmobilityareviewofphysiotherapistandpatientidentifiedlimitationsofcurrentlowerlimbexoskeletonsandthepotentialsoftroboticsolutions AT rahmannahian thestateoftheartofsoftroboticstoassistmobilityareviewofphysiotherapistandpatientidentifiedlimitationsofcurrentlowerlimbexoskeletonsandthepotentialsoftroboticsolutions AT turtonailie thestateoftheartofsoftroboticstoassistmobilityareviewofphysiotherapistandpatientidentifiedlimitationsofcurrentlowerlimbexoskeletonsandthepotentialsoftroboticsolutions AT crampmary thestateoftheartofsoftroboticstoassistmobilityareviewofphysiotherapistandpatientidentifiedlimitationsofcurrentlowerlimbexoskeletonsandthepotentialsoftroboticsolutions AT rossiterjonathan thestateoftheartofsoftroboticstoassistmobilityareviewofphysiotherapistandpatientidentifiedlimitationsofcurrentlowerlimbexoskeletonsandthepotentialsoftroboticsolutions |