Cargando…

The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions

BACKGROUND: Soft, wearable, powered exoskeletons are novel devices that may assist rehabilitation, allowing users to walk further or carry out activities of daily living. However, soft robotic exoskeletons, and the more commonly used rigid exoskeletons, are not widely adopted clinically. The availab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Leah, Diteesawat, Richard S., Rahman, Nahian, Turton, Ailie, Cramp, Mary, Rossiter, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36717869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01122-3
_version_ 1784879923181125632
author Morris, Leah
Diteesawat, Richard S.
Rahman, Nahian
Turton, Ailie
Cramp, Mary
Rossiter, Jonathan
author_facet Morris, Leah
Diteesawat, Richard S.
Rahman, Nahian
Turton, Ailie
Cramp, Mary
Rossiter, Jonathan
author_sort Morris, Leah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Soft, wearable, powered exoskeletons are novel devices that may assist rehabilitation, allowing users to walk further or carry out activities of daily living. However, soft robotic exoskeletons, and the more commonly used rigid exoskeletons, are not widely adopted clinically. The available evidence highlights a disconnect between the needs of exoskeleton users and the engineers designing devices. This review aimed to explore the literature on physiotherapist and patient perspectives of the longer-standing, and therefore greater evidenced, rigid exoskeleton limitations. It then offered potential solutions to these limitations, including soft robotics, from an engineering standpoint. METHODS: A state-of-the-art review was carried out which included both qualitative and quantitative research papers regarding patient and/or physiotherapist perspectives of rigid exoskeletons. Papers were themed and themes formed the review’s framework. RESULTS: Six main themes regarding the limitations of soft exoskeletons were important to physiotherapists and patients: safety; a one-size-fits approach; ease of device use; weight and placement of device; cost of device; and, specific to patients only, appearance of the device. Potential soft-robotics solutions to address these limitations were offered, including compliant actuators, sensors, suit attachments fitting to user’s body, and the use of control algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: It is evident that current exoskeletons are not meeting the needs of their users. Solutions to the limitations offered may inform device development. However, the solutions are not infallible and thus further research and development is required. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-022-01122-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9885398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98853982023-01-30 The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions Morris, Leah Diteesawat, Richard S. Rahman, Nahian Turton, Ailie Cramp, Mary Rossiter, Jonathan J Neuroeng Rehabil Review BACKGROUND: Soft, wearable, powered exoskeletons are novel devices that may assist rehabilitation, allowing users to walk further or carry out activities of daily living. However, soft robotic exoskeletons, and the more commonly used rigid exoskeletons, are not widely adopted clinically. The available evidence highlights a disconnect between the needs of exoskeleton users and the engineers designing devices. This review aimed to explore the literature on physiotherapist and patient perspectives of the longer-standing, and therefore greater evidenced, rigid exoskeleton limitations. It then offered potential solutions to these limitations, including soft robotics, from an engineering standpoint. METHODS: A state-of-the-art review was carried out which included both qualitative and quantitative research papers regarding patient and/or physiotherapist perspectives of rigid exoskeletons. Papers were themed and themes formed the review’s framework. RESULTS: Six main themes regarding the limitations of soft exoskeletons were important to physiotherapists and patients: safety; a one-size-fits approach; ease of device use; weight and placement of device; cost of device; and, specific to patients only, appearance of the device. Potential soft-robotics solutions to address these limitations were offered, including compliant actuators, sensors, suit attachments fitting to user’s body, and the use of control algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: It is evident that current exoskeletons are not meeting the needs of their users. Solutions to the limitations offered may inform device development. However, the solutions are not infallible and thus further research and development is required. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-022-01122-3. BioMed Central 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9885398/ /pubmed/36717869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01122-3 Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Morris, Leah
Diteesawat, Richard S.
Rahman, Nahian
Turton, Ailie
Cramp, Mary
Rossiter, Jonathan
The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions
title The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions
title_full The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions
title_fullStr The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions
title_full_unstemmed The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions
title_short The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions
title_sort the-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36717869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01122-3
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisleah thestateoftheartofsoftroboticstoassistmobilityareviewofphysiotherapistandpatientidentifiedlimitationsofcurrentlowerlimbexoskeletonsandthepotentialsoftroboticsolutions
AT diteesawatrichards thestateoftheartofsoftroboticstoassistmobilityareviewofphysiotherapistandpatientidentifiedlimitationsofcurrentlowerlimbexoskeletonsandthepotentialsoftroboticsolutions
AT rahmannahian thestateoftheartofsoftroboticstoassistmobilityareviewofphysiotherapistandpatientidentifiedlimitationsofcurrentlowerlimbexoskeletonsandthepotentialsoftroboticsolutions
AT turtonailie thestateoftheartofsoftroboticstoassistmobilityareviewofphysiotherapistandpatientidentifiedlimitationsofcurrentlowerlimbexoskeletonsandthepotentialsoftroboticsolutions
AT crampmary thestateoftheartofsoftroboticstoassistmobilityareviewofphysiotherapistandpatientidentifiedlimitationsofcurrentlowerlimbexoskeletonsandthepotentialsoftroboticsolutions
AT rossiterjonathan thestateoftheartofsoftroboticstoassistmobilityareviewofphysiotherapistandpatientidentifiedlimitationsofcurrentlowerlimbexoskeletonsandthepotentialsoftroboticsolutions