Inappropriate Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Due to Not Accounting for Nesting and Clustering: Comment on “A Home-Based Dyadic Music-with-Movement Intervention for People with Dementia and Caregivers: A Hybrid Type 2 Cluster-Randomized Effectiveness-Implementation Design” [Letter]

Ejemplares similares

• Corrected analysis of “the effects of bright light treatment on affective symptoms in people with dementia: a 24-week cluster randomized controlled trial” that accounts for clustering and nesting verifies conclusions
  por: Jamshidi-Naeini, Yasaman, et al.
  Publicado: (2023)
• Ignoring Clustering and Nesting in Cluster Randomized Trials Renders Conclusions Unverifiable [Letter]
  por: Siddique, Abu Bakkar, et al.
  Publicado: (2022)
• Accounting for the clustering and nesting effects verifies most conclusions. Corrected analysis of: “Randomized nutrient bar supplementation improves exercise-associated changes in plasma metabolome in adolescents and adult family members at cardiometabolic risk”
  por: Jamshidi-Naeini, Yasaman, et al.
  Publicado: (2022)
• Only one cluster per condition is an invalid design for a cluster randomized trial and should be re-labeled a quasi-experimental study. Response to: “Effect of behavioral activation on time and frequency domain heart rate variability in older adults with subthreshold depression: a cluster randomized controlled trial in Thailand”
  por: Jamshidi-Naeini, Yasaman, et al.
  Publicado: (2023)
• Re-analysis of data from a cluster RCT entitled “health literacy and exercise-focused interventions on clinical measurements in Chinese diabetes patients”
  por: Jamshidi-Naeini, Yasaman, et al.
  Publicado: (2022)