Cargando…
On the precision of 6 DoF IMU-LiDAR based localization in GNSS-denied scenarios
Positioning and navigation represent relevant topics in the field of robotics, due to their multiple applications in real-world scenarios, ranging from autonomous driving to harsh environment exploration. Despite localization in outdoor environments is generally achieved using a Global Navigation Sa...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761489 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1064930 |
_version_ | 1784883353600655360 |
---|---|
author | Frosi, Matteo Bertoglio, Riccardo Matteucci, Matteo |
author_facet | Frosi, Matteo Bertoglio, Riccardo Matteucci, Matteo |
author_sort | Frosi, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Positioning and navigation represent relevant topics in the field of robotics, due to their multiple applications in real-world scenarios, ranging from autonomous driving to harsh environment exploration. Despite localization in outdoor environments is generally achieved using a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver, global navigation satellite system-denied environments are typical of many situations, especially in indoor settings. Autonomous robots are commonly equipped with multiple sensors, including laser rangefinders, IMUs, and odometers, which can be used for mapping and localization, overcoming the need for global navigation satellite system data. In literature, almost no information can be found on the positioning accuracy and precision of 6 Degrees of Freedom Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) localization systems, especially for real-world scenarios. In this paper, we present a short review of state-of-the-art light detection and ranging localization methods in global navigation satellite system-denied environments, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. Then, we evaluate two state-of-the-art Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) systems able to also perform localization, one of which implemented by us. We benchmark these two algorithms on manually collected dataset, with the goal of providing an insight into their attainable precision in real-world scenarios. In particular, we present two experimental campaigns, one indoor and one outdoor, to measure the precision of these algorithms. After creating a map for each of the two environments, using the simultaneous localization and mapping part of the systems, we compute a custom localization error for multiple, different trajectories. Results show that the two algorithms are comparable in terms of precision, having a similar mean translation and rotation errors of about 0.01 m and 0.6°, respectively. Nevertheless, the system implemented by us has the advantage of being modular, customizable and able to achieve real-time performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9902871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99028712023-02-08 On the precision of 6 DoF IMU-LiDAR based localization in GNSS-denied scenarios Frosi, Matteo Bertoglio, Riccardo Matteucci, Matteo Front Robot AI Robotics and AI Positioning and navigation represent relevant topics in the field of robotics, due to their multiple applications in real-world scenarios, ranging from autonomous driving to harsh environment exploration. Despite localization in outdoor environments is generally achieved using a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver, global navigation satellite system-denied environments are typical of many situations, especially in indoor settings. Autonomous robots are commonly equipped with multiple sensors, including laser rangefinders, IMUs, and odometers, which can be used for mapping and localization, overcoming the need for global navigation satellite system data. In literature, almost no information can be found on the positioning accuracy and precision of 6 Degrees of Freedom Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) localization systems, especially for real-world scenarios. In this paper, we present a short review of state-of-the-art light detection and ranging localization methods in global navigation satellite system-denied environments, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. Then, we evaluate two state-of-the-art Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) systems able to also perform localization, one of which implemented by us. We benchmark these two algorithms on manually collected dataset, with the goal of providing an insight into their attainable precision in real-world scenarios. In particular, we present two experimental campaigns, one indoor and one outdoor, to measure the precision of these algorithms. After creating a map for each of the two environments, using the simultaneous localization and mapping part of the systems, we compute a custom localization error for multiple, different trajectories. Results show that the two algorithms are comparable in terms of precision, having a similar mean translation and rotation errors of about 0.01 m and 0.6°, respectively. Nevertheless, the system implemented by us has the advantage of being modular, customizable and able to achieve real-time performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9902871/ /pubmed/36761489 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1064930 Text en Copyright © 2023 Frosi, Bertoglio and Matteucci. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Robotics and AI Frosi, Matteo Bertoglio, Riccardo Matteucci, Matteo On the precision of 6 DoF IMU-LiDAR based localization in GNSS-denied scenarios |
title | On the precision of 6 DoF IMU-LiDAR based localization in GNSS-denied scenarios |
title_full | On the precision of 6 DoF IMU-LiDAR based localization in GNSS-denied scenarios |
title_fullStr | On the precision of 6 DoF IMU-LiDAR based localization in GNSS-denied scenarios |
title_full_unstemmed | On the precision of 6 DoF IMU-LiDAR based localization in GNSS-denied scenarios |
title_short | On the precision of 6 DoF IMU-LiDAR based localization in GNSS-denied scenarios |
title_sort | on the precision of 6 dof imu-lidar based localization in gnss-denied scenarios |
topic | Robotics and AI |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761489 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1064930 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frosimatteo ontheprecisionof6dofimulidarbasedlocalizationingnssdeniedscenarios AT bertoglioriccardo ontheprecisionof6dofimulidarbasedlocalizationingnssdeniedscenarios AT matteuccimatteo ontheprecisionof6dofimulidarbasedlocalizationingnssdeniedscenarios |