Cargando…
Informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia
BACKGROUND: Use of modified texture diets—thickening of liquids and modifying the texture of foods—in the hope of preventing aspiration, pneumonia and choking, has become central to the current management of dysphagia. The effectiveness of this intervention has been questioned. We examine requiremen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9903443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36750907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00885-1 |
_version_ | 1784883473087987712 |
---|---|
author | O’Keeffe, Shaun T. Leslie, Paula Lazenby-Paterson, Tracy McCurtin, Arlene Collins, Lindsey Murray, Aoife Smith, Alison Mulkerrin, Siofra |
author_facet | O’Keeffe, Shaun T. Leslie, Paula Lazenby-Paterson, Tracy McCurtin, Arlene Collins, Lindsey Murray, Aoife Smith, Alison Mulkerrin, Siofra |
author_sort | O’Keeffe, Shaun T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Use of modified texture diets—thickening of liquids and modifying the texture of foods—in the hope of preventing aspiration, pneumonia and choking, has become central to the current management of dysphagia. The effectiveness of this intervention has been questioned. We examine requirements for a valid informed consent process for this approach and whether the need for informed consent for this treatment is always understood or applied by practitioners. MAIN TEXT: Valid informed consent requires provision of accurate and balanced information, and that agreement is given freely by someone who knows they have a choice. Current evidence, including surveys of practitioners and patients in different settings, suggests that practice in this area is often inadequate. This may be due to patients’ communication difficulties but also poor communication—and no real attempt to obtain consent—by practitioners before people are ‘put on’ modified texture diets. Even where discussion occurs, recommendations may be influenced by professional misconceptions about the efficacy of this treatment, which in turn may poison the well for the informed consent process. Patients cannot make appropriate decisions for themselves if the information provided is flawed and unbalanced. The voluntariness of patients’ decisions is also questionable if they are told ‘you must’, when ‘you might consider’ is more appropriate. Where the decision-making capacity of patients is in question, inappropriate judgements and recommendations may be made by substitute decision makers and courts unless based on accurate information. CONCLUSION: Research is required to examine the informed consent processes in different settings, but there is ample reason to suggest that current practice in this area is suboptimal. Staff need to reflect on their current practice regarding use of modified texture diets with an awareness of the current evidence and through the ‘lens’ of informed consent. Education is required for staff to clarify the importance of, and requirements for, valid informed consent and for decision making that reflects people’s preferences and values. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9903443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99034432023-02-08 Informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia O’Keeffe, Shaun T. Leslie, Paula Lazenby-Paterson, Tracy McCurtin, Arlene Collins, Lindsey Murray, Aoife Smith, Alison Mulkerrin, Siofra BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: Use of modified texture diets—thickening of liquids and modifying the texture of foods—in the hope of preventing aspiration, pneumonia and choking, has become central to the current management of dysphagia. The effectiveness of this intervention has been questioned. We examine requirements for a valid informed consent process for this approach and whether the need for informed consent for this treatment is always understood or applied by practitioners. MAIN TEXT: Valid informed consent requires provision of accurate and balanced information, and that agreement is given freely by someone who knows they have a choice. Current evidence, including surveys of practitioners and patients in different settings, suggests that practice in this area is often inadequate. This may be due to patients’ communication difficulties but also poor communication—and no real attempt to obtain consent—by practitioners before people are ‘put on’ modified texture diets. Even where discussion occurs, recommendations may be influenced by professional misconceptions about the efficacy of this treatment, which in turn may poison the well for the informed consent process. Patients cannot make appropriate decisions for themselves if the information provided is flawed and unbalanced. The voluntariness of patients’ decisions is also questionable if they are told ‘you must’, when ‘you might consider’ is more appropriate. Where the decision-making capacity of patients is in question, inappropriate judgements and recommendations may be made by substitute decision makers and courts unless based on accurate information. CONCLUSION: Research is required to examine the informed consent processes in different settings, but there is ample reason to suggest that current practice in this area is suboptimal. Staff need to reflect on their current practice regarding use of modified texture diets with an awareness of the current evidence and through the ‘lens’ of informed consent. Education is required for staff to clarify the importance of, and requirements for, valid informed consent and for decision making that reflects people’s preferences and values. BioMed Central 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9903443/ /pubmed/36750907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00885-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Debate O’Keeffe, Shaun T. Leslie, Paula Lazenby-Paterson, Tracy McCurtin, Arlene Collins, Lindsey Murray, Aoife Smith, Alison Mulkerrin, Siofra Informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia |
title | Informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia |
title_full | Informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia |
title_fullStr | Informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia |
title_full_unstemmed | Informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia |
title_short | Informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia |
title_sort | informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9903443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36750907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00885-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okeeffeshaunt informedormisinformedconsentanduseofmodifiedtexturedietsindysphagia AT lesliepaula informedormisinformedconsentanduseofmodifiedtexturedietsindysphagia AT lazenbypatersontracy informedormisinformedconsentanduseofmodifiedtexturedietsindysphagia AT mccurtinarlene informedormisinformedconsentanduseofmodifiedtexturedietsindysphagia AT collinslindsey informedormisinformedconsentanduseofmodifiedtexturedietsindysphagia AT murrayaoife informedormisinformedconsentanduseofmodifiedtexturedietsindysphagia AT smithalison informedormisinformedconsentanduseofmodifiedtexturedietsindysphagia AT mulkerrinsiofra informedormisinformedconsentanduseofmodifiedtexturedietsindysphagia AT informedormisinformedconsentanduseofmodifiedtexturedietsindysphagia |