Cargando…

Creative destruction: New protein folds from old

Mechanisms of emergence and divergence of protein folds pose central questions in biological sciences. Incremental mutation and stepwise adaptation explain relationships between topologically similar protein folds. However, the universe of folds is diverse and riotous, suggesting more potent and cre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alvarez-Carreño, Claudia, Gupta, Rohan J., Petrov, Anton S., Williams, Loren Dean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36534803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207897119
_version_ 1784884105410772992
author Alvarez-Carreño, Claudia
Gupta, Rohan J.
Petrov, Anton S.
Williams, Loren Dean
author_facet Alvarez-Carreño, Claudia
Gupta, Rohan J.
Petrov, Anton S.
Williams, Loren Dean
author_sort Alvarez-Carreño, Claudia
collection PubMed
description Mechanisms of emergence and divergence of protein folds pose central questions in biological sciences. Incremental mutation and stepwise adaptation explain relationships between topologically similar protein folds. However, the universe of folds is diverse and riotous, suggesting more potent and creative forces are at play. Sequence and structure similarity are observed between distinct folds, indicating that proteins with distinct folds may share common ancestry. We found evidence of common ancestry between three distinct β-barrel folds: Scr kinase family homology (SH3), oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB), and cradle loop barrel (CLB). The data suggest a mechanism of fold evolution that interconverts SH3, OB, and CLB. This mechanism, which we call creative destruction, can be generalized to explain many examples of fold evolution including circular permutation. In creative destruction, an open reading frame duplicates or otherwise merges with another to produce a fused polypeptide. A merger forces two ancestral domains into a new sequence and spatial context. The fused polypeptide can explore folding landscapes that are inaccessible to either of the independent ancestral domains. However, the folding landscapes of the fused polypeptide are not fully independent of those of the ancestral domains. Creative destruction is thus partially conservative; a daughter fold inherits some motifs from ancestral folds. After merger and refolding, adaptive processes such as mutation and loss of extraneous segments optimize the new daughter fold. This model has application in disease states characterized by genetic instability. Fused proteins observed in cancer cells are likely to experience remodeled folding landscapes and realize altered folds, conferring new or altered functions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9907106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99071062023-02-08 Creative destruction: New protein folds from old Alvarez-Carreño, Claudia Gupta, Rohan J. Petrov, Anton S. Williams, Loren Dean Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Mechanisms of emergence and divergence of protein folds pose central questions in biological sciences. Incremental mutation and stepwise adaptation explain relationships between topologically similar protein folds. However, the universe of folds is diverse and riotous, suggesting more potent and creative forces are at play. Sequence and structure similarity are observed between distinct folds, indicating that proteins with distinct folds may share common ancestry. We found evidence of common ancestry between three distinct β-barrel folds: Scr kinase family homology (SH3), oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB), and cradle loop barrel (CLB). The data suggest a mechanism of fold evolution that interconverts SH3, OB, and CLB. This mechanism, which we call creative destruction, can be generalized to explain many examples of fold evolution including circular permutation. In creative destruction, an open reading frame duplicates or otherwise merges with another to produce a fused polypeptide. A merger forces two ancestral domains into a new sequence and spatial context. The fused polypeptide can explore folding landscapes that are inaccessible to either of the independent ancestral domains. However, the folding landscapes of the fused polypeptide are not fully independent of those of the ancestral domains. Creative destruction is thus partially conservative; a daughter fold inherits some motifs from ancestral folds. After merger and refolding, adaptive processes such as mutation and loss of extraneous segments optimize the new daughter fold. This model has application in disease states characterized by genetic instability. Fused proteins observed in cancer cells are likely to experience remodeled folding landscapes and realize altered folds, conferring new or altered functions. National Academy of Sciences 2022-12-19 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9907106/ /pubmed/36534803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207897119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Biological Sciences
Alvarez-Carreño, Claudia
Gupta, Rohan J.
Petrov, Anton S.
Williams, Loren Dean
Creative destruction: New protein folds from old
title Creative destruction: New protein folds from old
title_full Creative destruction: New protein folds from old
title_fullStr Creative destruction: New protein folds from old
title_full_unstemmed Creative destruction: New protein folds from old
title_short Creative destruction: New protein folds from old
title_sort creative destruction: new protein folds from old
topic Biological Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36534803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207897119
work_keys_str_mv AT alvarezcarrenoclaudia creativedestructionnewproteinfoldsfromold
AT guptarohanj creativedestructionnewproteinfoldsfromold
AT petrovantons creativedestructionnewproteinfoldsfromold
AT williamslorendean creativedestructionnewproteinfoldsfromold