Cargando…
Red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Results from observational studies suggest an association of red meat intake with risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). However, results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not clearly supported a mechanistic link between red meat intake and T2D risk factors. T...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41430-022-01150-1 |
_version_ | 1784884385401536512 |
---|---|
author | Sanders, Lisa M. Wilcox, Meredith L. Maki, Kevin C. |
author_facet | Sanders, Lisa M. Wilcox, Meredith L. Maki, Kevin C. |
author_sort | Sanders, Lisa M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Results from observational studies suggest an association of red meat intake with risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). However, results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not clearly supported a mechanistic link between red meat intake and T2D risk factors. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on RCTs evaluating the effects of diets containing red meat (beef, pork, lamb, etc.), compared to diets with lower or no red meat, on markers of glucose homeostasis in adults. METHODS: A search of PubMed and CENTRAL yielded 21 relevant RCTs. Pooled estimates were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) between the red meat intervention and the comparator intervention with less or no red meat. RESULTS: Compared to diets with reduced or no red meat intake, there was no significant impact of red meat intake on insulin sensitivity (SMD: −0.11; 95% CI: −0.39, 0.16), insulin resistance (SMD: 0.11; 95% CI: −0.24, 0.45), fasting glucose (SMD: 0.13; 95% CI: −0.04, 0.29), fasting insulin (SMD: 0.08; 95% CI: −0.16, 0.32), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c; SMD: 0.10; 95% CI: −0.37, 0.58), pancreatic beta-cell function (SMD: −0.13; 95% CI: −0.37, 0.10), or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1; SMD: 0.10; 95% CI: −0.37, 0.58). Red meat intake modestly reduced postprandial glucose (SMD: −0.44; 95% CI: −0.67, −0.22; P < 0.001) compared to meals with reduced or no red meat intake. The quality of evidence was low to moderate for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis suggest red meat intake does not impact most glycemic and insulinemic risk factors for T2D. Further investigations are needed on other markers of glucose homeostasis to better understand whether a causal relationship exists between red meat intake and risk of T2D. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020176059 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9908545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99085452023-02-10 Red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Sanders, Lisa M. Wilcox, Meredith L. Maki, Kevin C. Eur J Clin Nutr Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Results from observational studies suggest an association of red meat intake with risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). However, results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not clearly supported a mechanistic link between red meat intake and T2D risk factors. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on RCTs evaluating the effects of diets containing red meat (beef, pork, lamb, etc.), compared to diets with lower or no red meat, on markers of glucose homeostasis in adults. METHODS: A search of PubMed and CENTRAL yielded 21 relevant RCTs. Pooled estimates were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) between the red meat intervention and the comparator intervention with less or no red meat. RESULTS: Compared to diets with reduced or no red meat intake, there was no significant impact of red meat intake on insulin sensitivity (SMD: −0.11; 95% CI: −0.39, 0.16), insulin resistance (SMD: 0.11; 95% CI: −0.24, 0.45), fasting glucose (SMD: 0.13; 95% CI: −0.04, 0.29), fasting insulin (SMD: 0.08; 95% CI: −0.16, 0.32), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c; SMD: 0.10; 95% CI: −0.37, 0.58), pancreatic beta-cell function (SMD: −0.13; 95% CI: −0.37, 0.10), or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1; SMD: 0.10; 95% CI: −0.37, 0.58). Red meat intake modestly reduced postprandial glucose (SMD: −0.44; 95% CI: −0.67, −0.22; P < 0.001) compared to meals with reduced or no red meat intake. The quality of evidence was low to moderate for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis suggest red meat intake does not impact most glycemic and insulinemic risk factors for T2D. Further investigations are needed on other markers of glucose homeostasis to better understand whether a causal relationship exists between red meat intake and risk of T2D. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020176059 Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9908545/ /pubmed/35513448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41430-022-01150-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Sanders, Lisa M. Wilcox, Meredith L. Maki, Kevin C. Red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41430-022-01150-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanderslisam redmeatconsumptionandriskfactorsfortype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wilcoxmeredithl redmeatconsumptionandriskfactorsfortype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT makikevinc redmeatconsumptionandriskfactorsfortype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |