Cargando…

Evaluation of online interprofessional simulation workshops for obstetric and neonatal emergencies

OBJECTIVES: To explore student perceptions of learning and interprofessional aspects of obstetric and neonatal emergencies through online simulation-based workshops. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted at Monash University, Australia. Data were obtained from six separate online Obstetric N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prasad, Namrata, Fernando, Shavi, Willey, Sue, Davey, Kym, Hocking, Jennifer, Malhotra, Atul, Kumar, Arunaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IJME 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36332272
http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.6342.9214
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To explore student perceptions of learning and interprofessional aspects of obstetric and neonatal emergencies through online simulation-based workshops. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted at Monash University, Australia. Data were obtained from six separate online Obstetric Neonatal Emergency Simulation workshops held between May 2020 and August 2021. A total of 385 students attended and were invited to participate in the study by completing an online survey two-three weeks later. Of the attendees, 144 students completed the survey (95 medical, 45 midwifery), equating to a response rate of 37%. Survey responses were downloaded from online survey platform and separated into medical and midwifery responses. Thematic analysis of data was performed using a coding framework, resulting in development of themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Main themes were adaptability, connectivism, preparedness for practice, experiential learning, learning through modelling and dynamics of online interaction. Students reported that online workshop was a useful alternative method to experience simulation-based learning, increase their readiness for clinical practice and foster positive interprofessional relationships. Consistent with existing literature evaluating similar in-person programs, midwifery students were most interested in interprofessional interaction (predominant theme: dynamics of online interaction), whilst medical students were more concerned with developing clinical skills (predominant themes: learning through modelling, experiential learning). CONCLUSIONS: Online learning may be a useful and convenient way of delivering interprofessional simulation-based education during the pandemic, in remote areas and as an adjunct to in-person teaching. Future studies should evaluate the impact of online learning with a mixed methods study and in comparison, to in-person programs.