Cargando…

Quantitative comparison of manuka and clover honey proteomes with royal jelly

Royal jelly and honey are two substances produced successively by the worker bee caste. Modern proteomics approaches have been used to explore the protein component of each substance independently, but to date none have quantitatively compared the protein profile of honey and royal jelly directly. S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paget, Blake W., Kleffmann, Torsten, Whiteman, Kim E., Thomas, Mark F., McMahon, Chris D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9916596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272898
_version_ 1784886164714422272
author Paget, Blake W.
Kleffmann, Torsten
Whiteman, Kim E.
Thomas, Mark F.
McMahon, Chris D.
author_facet Paget, Blake W.
Kleffmann, Torsten
Whiteman, Kim E.
Thomas, Mark F.
McMahon, Chris D.
author_sort Paget, Blake W.
collection PubMed
description Royal jelly and honey are two substances produced successively by the worker bee caste. Modern proteomics approaches have been used to explore the protein component of each substance independently, but to date none have quantitatively compared the protein profile of honey and royal jelly directly. Sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment-ion spectra mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS) was used to compare protein quantities of bee origin in mānuka and clover honey to royal jelly. Two analysis techniques identified 76 proteins in total. Peptide intensity was directly compared for a subset of 31 proteins that were identified with high confidence, and the relative changes in protein abundance were compared between each honey type and royal jelly. Major Royal Jelly Proteins (MRJPs) had similar profiles in both honeys, except MRJP6, which was significantly more abundant in clover honey. Proteins involved in nectar metabolism were more abundant in honey than in royal jelly as expected. However, the trend revealed a potential catalytic role for MRJP6 in clover honey and a nectar- or honey-specific role for uncharacterised protein LOC408608. The abundance of MRJP6 in mānuka honey was equivalent to royal jelly suggesting a potential effect of nectar type on expression of this protein. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD038889.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9916596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99165962023-02-11 Quantitative comparison of manuka and clover honey proteomes with royal jelly Paget, Blake W. Kleffmann, Torsten Whiteman, Kim E. Thomas, Mark F. McMahon, Chris D. PLoS One Research Article Royal jelly and honey are two substances produced successively by the worker bee caste. Modern proteomics approaches have been used to explore the protein component of each substance independently, but to date none have quantitatively compared the protein profile of honey and royal jelly directly. Sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment-ion spectra mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS) was used to compare protein quantities of bee origin in mānuka and clover honey to royal jelly. Two analysis techniques identified 76 proteins in total. Peptide intensity was directly compared for a subset of 31 proteins that were identified with high confidence, and the relative changes in protein abundance were compared between each honey type and royal jelly. Major Royal Jelly Proteins (MRJPs) had similar profiles in both honeys, except MRJP6, which was significantly more abundant in clover honey. Proteins involved in nectar metabolism were more abundant in honey than in royal jelly as expected. However, the trend revealed a potential catalytic role for MRJP6 in clover honey and a nectar- or honey-specific role for uncharacterised protein LOC408608. The abundance of MRJP6 in mānuka honey was equivalent to royal jelly suggesting a potential effect of nectar type on expression of this protein. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD038889. Public Library of Science 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9916596/ /pubmed/36763642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272898 Text en © 2023 Paget et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Paget, Blake W.
Kleffmann, Torsten
Whiteman, Kim E.
Thomas, Mark F.
McMahon, Chris D.
Quantitative comparison of manuka and clover honey proteomes with royal jelly
title Quantitative comparison of manuka and clover honey proteomes with royal jelly
title_full Quantitative comparison of manuka and clover honey proteomes with royal jelly
title_fullStr Quantitative comparison of manuka and clover honey proteomes with royal jelly
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative comparison of manuka and clover honey proteomes with royal jelly
title_short Quantitative comparison of manuka and clover honey proteomes with royal jelly
title_sort quantitative comparison of manuka and clover honey proteomes with royal jelly
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9916596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272898
work_keys_str_mv AT pagetblakew quantitativecomparisonofmanukaandcloverhoneyproteomeswithroyaljelly
AT kleffmanntorsten quantitativecomparisonofmanukaandcloverhoneyproteomeswithroyaljelly
AT whitemankime quantitativecomparisonofmanukaandcloverhoneyproteomeswithroyaljelly
AT thomasmarkf quantitativecomparisonofmanukaandcloverhoneyproteomeswithroyaljelly
AT mcmahonchrisd quantitativecomparisonofmanukaandcloverhoneyproteomeswithroyaljelly