Cargando…

Design, Synthesis, and Antiproliferative Activity of New 5-Chloro-indole-2-carboxylate and Pyrrolo[3,4-b]indol-3-one Derivatives as Potent Inhibitors of EGFR(T790M)/BRAF(V600E) Pathways

Mutant EGFR/BRAF pathways are thought to be crucial targets for the development of anticancer drugs since they are over-activated in several malignancies. We present here the development of a novel series of 5-chloro-indole-2-carboxylate 3a–e, 4a–c and pyrrolo[3,4-b]indol-3-ones 5a–c derivatives as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Wahaibi, Lamya H., Mohammed, Anber F., Abdelrahman, Mostafa H., Trembleau, Laurent, Youssif, Bahaa G. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9921301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36770936
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031269
Descripción
Sumario:Mutant EGFR/BRAF pathways are thought to be crucial targets for the development of anticancer drugs since they are over-activated in several malignancies. We present here the development of a novel series of 5-chloro-indole-2-carboxylate 3a–e, 4a–c and pyrrolo[3,4-b]indol-3-ones 5a–c derivatives as potent inhibitors of mutant EGFR/BRAF pathways with antiproliferative activity. The cell viability assay results of 3a–e, 4a–c, and 5a–c revealed that none of the compounds tested were cytotoxic, and that the majority of those tested at 50 µM had cell viability levels greater than 87%. Compounds 3a–e, 4a–c, and 5a–c had significant antiproliferative activity with GI(50) values ranging from 29 nM to 78 nM, with 3a–e outperforming 4a–c and 5a–c in their inhibitory actions against the tested cancer cell lines. Compounds 3a–e were tested for EGFR inhibition, with IC(50) values ranging from 68 nM to 89 nM. The most potent derivative was found to be the m-piperidinyl derivative 3e (R = m-piperidin-1-yl), with an IC(50) value of 68 nM, which was 1.2-fold more potent than erlotinib (IC(50) = 80 nM). Interestingly, all the tested compounds 3a–e had higher anti-BRAF(V600E) activity than the reference erlotinib but were less potent than vemurafenib, with compound 3e having the most potent activity. Moreover, compounds 3b and 3e showed an 8-fold selectivity index toward EGFR(T790M) protein over wild-type. Additionally, molecular docking of 3a and 3b against BRAF(V600E) and EGFR(T790M) enzymes revealed high binding affinity and active site interactions compared to the co-crystalized ligands. The pharmacokinetics properties (ADME) of 3a–e revealed safety and good pharmacokinetic profile.