Cargando…

The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios

Mixing grass with legumes before ensiling is beneficial for improving dry matter and crude protein yield, but additional information is needed to balance nutrient content and fermentation quality. In this study, the microbial community, fermentation characteristics, and nutrient content of Napier gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guan, Hao, Li, Haiping, Gan, Li, Chen, Shiyong, Yan, Yanhong, Jia, Zhifeng, Liu, Wenhui, Wei, Xiaoxing, Ma, Xiang, Zhou, Qingping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36794009
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1112058
_version_ 1784887595328602112
author Guan, Hao
Li, Haiping
Gan, Li
Chen, Shiyong
Yan, Yanhong
Jia, Zhifeng
Liu, Wenhui
Wei, Xiaoxing
Ma, Xiang
Zhou, Qingping
author_facet Guan, Hao
Li, Haiping
Gan, Li
Chen, Shiyong
Yan, Yanhong
Jia, Zhifeng
Liu, Wenhui
Wei, Xiaoxing
Ma, Xiang
Zhou, Qingping
author_sort Guan, Hao
collection PubMed
description Mixing grass with legumes before ensiling is beneficial for improving dry matter and crude protein yield, but additional information is needed to balance nutrient content and fermentation quality. In this study, the microbial community, fermentation characteristics, and nutrient content of Napier grass mixed with alfalfa at different proportions were assessed. Tested proportions included: 100:0 (M0), 70:30 (M3), 50:50 (M5), 30:70 (M7), and 0:100 (MF). Treatments included: (CK) sterilized deionized water; (IN) selected lactic acid bacteria: Lactobacillus plantarum CGMCC 23166 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 18233 (1.5 × 10(5) cfu/g of fresh weight for each inoculant); and (CO) commercial lactic acid bacteria: L. plantarum (1 × 10(5) cfu/g of fresh weight). All mixtures were ensiled for 60 days. Data analysis was used as a completely randomized design with a 5-by-3 factorial arrangement of treatments. The results showed that with increasing alfalfa mixing ratio, dry matter, and crude protein increased, while neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber decreased both before and after ensiling (p < 0.05), which was not influenced by fermentation. Inoculation with IN and CO decreased pH and increased the lactic acid content compared to CK (p < 0.05), especially in silages M7 and MF. The highest Shannon index (6.24) and Simpson index (0.93) were observed in the MF silage CK treatment (p < 0.05). The relative abundance of Lactiplantibacillus decreased with increasing alfalfa mixing ratio, while the abundance of Lactiplantibacillus was significantly higher in the IN-treated group than in other treatment groups (p < 0.05). A higher alfalfa mixing ratio improved the nutrient value, but also made fermentation more difficult. Inoculants improved the fermentation quality by increasing the abundance of Lactiplantibacillus. In conclusion, the groups M3 and M5 achieved the optimal balance of nutrients and fermentation. If a higher proportion of alfalfa needs to be used, it is recommended to use inoculants to ensure sufficient fermentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9922753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99227532023-02-14 The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios Guan, Hao Li, Haiping Gan, Li Chen, Shiyong Yan, Yanhong Jia, Zhifeng Liu, Wenhui Wei, Xiaoxing Ma, Xiang Zhou, Qingping Front Microbiol Microbiology Mixing grass with legumes before ensiling is beneficial for improving dry matter and crude protein yield, but additional information is needed to balance nutrient content and fermentation quality. In this study, the microbial community, fermentation characteristics, and nutrient content of Napier grass mixed with alfalfa at different proportions were assessed. Tested proportions included: 100:0 (M0), 70:30 (M3), 50:50 (M5), 30:70 (M7), and 0:100 (MF). Treatments included: (CK) sterilized deionized water; (IN) selected lactic acid bacteria: Lactobacillus plantarum CGMCC 23166 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 18233 (1.5 × 10(5) cfu/g of fresh weight for each inoculant); and (CO) commercial lactic acid bacteria: L. plantarum (1 × 10(5) cfu/g of fresh weight). All mixtures were ensiled for 60 days. Data analysis was used as a completely randomized design with a 5-by-3 factorial arrangement of treatments. The results showed that with increasing alfalfa mixing ratio, dry matter, and crude protein increased, while neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber decreased both before and after ensiling (p < 0.05), which was not influenced by fermentation. Inoculation with IN and CO decreased pH and increased the lactic acid content compared to CK (p < 0.05), especially in silages M7 and MF. The highest Shannon index (6.24) and Simpson index (0.93) were observed in the MF silage CK treatment (p < 0.05). The relative abundance of Lactiplantibacillus decreased with increasing alfalfa mixing ratio, while the abundance of Lactiplantibacillus was significantly higher in the IN-treated group than in other treatment groups (p < 0.05). A higher alfalfa mixing ratio improved the nutrient value, but also made fermentation more difficult. Inoculants improved the fermentation quality by increasing the abundance of Lactiplantibacillus. In conclusion, the groups M3 and M5 achieved the optimal balance of nutrients and fermentation. If a higher proportion of alfalfa needs to be used, it is recommended to use inoculants to ensure sufficient fermentation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9922753/ /pubmed/36794009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1112058 Text en Copyright © 2023 Guan, Li, Gan, Chen, Yan, Jia, Liu, Wei, Ma and Zhou. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Guan, Hao
Li, Haiping
Gan, Li
Chen, Shiyong
Yan, Yanhong
Jia, Zhifeng
Liu, Wenhui
Wei, Xiaoxing
Ma, Xiang
Zhou, Qingping
The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios
title The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios
title_full The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios
title_fullStr The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios
title_full_unstemmed The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios
title_short The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios
title_sort effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36794009
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1112058
work_keys_str_mv AT guanhao theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT lihaiping theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT ganli theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT chenshiyong theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT yanyanhong theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT jiazhifeng theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT liuwenhui theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT weixiaoxing theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT maxiang theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT zhouqingping theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT guanhao effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT lihaiping effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT ganli effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT chenshiyong effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT yanyanhong effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT jiazhifeng effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT liuwenhui effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT weixiaoxing effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT maxiang effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios
AT zhouqingping effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios