Cargando…
The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios
Mixing grass with legumes before ensiling is beneficial for improving dry matter and crude protein yield, but additional information is needed to balance nutrient content and fermentation quality. In this study, the microbial community, fermentation characteristics, and nutrient content of Napier gr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36794009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1112058 |
_version_ | 1784887595328602112 |
---|---|
author | Guan, Hao Li, Haiping Gan, Li Chen, Shiyong Yan, Yanhong Jia, Zhifeng Liu, Wenhui Wei, Xiaoxing Ma, Xiang Zhou, Qingping |
author_facet | Guan, Hao Li, Haiping Gan, Li Chen, Shiyong Yan, Yanhong Jia, Zhifeng Liu, Wenhui Wei, Xiaoxing Ma, Xiang Zhou, Qingping |
author_sort | Guan, Hao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mixing grass with legumes before ensiling is beneficial for improving dry matter and crude protein yield, but additional information is needed to balance nutrient content and fermentation quality. In this study, the microbial community, fermentation characteristics, and nutrient content of Napier grass mixed with alfalfa at different proportions were assessed. Tested proportions included: 100:0 (M0), 70:30 (M3), 50:50 (M5), 30:70 (M7), and 0:100 (MF). Treatments included: (CK) sterilized deionized water; (IN) selected lactic acid bacteria: Lactobacillus plantarum CGMCC 23166 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 18233 (1.5 × 10(5) cfu/g of fresh weight for each inoculant); and (CO) commercial lactic acid bacteria: L. plantarum (1 × 10(5) cfu/g of fresh weight). All mixtures were ensiled for 60 days. Data analysis was used as a completely randomized design with a 5-by-3 factorial arrangement of treatments. The results showed that with increasing alfalfa mixing ratio, dry matter, and crude protein increased, while neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber decreased both before and after ensiling (p < 0.05), which was not influenced by fermentation. Inoculation with IN and CO decreased pH and increased the lactic acid content compared to CK (p < 0.05), especially in silages M7 and MF. The highest Shannon index (6.24) and Simpson index (0.93) were observed in the MF silage CK treatment (p < 0.05). The relative abundance of Lactiplantibacillus decreased with increasing alfalfa mixing ratio, while the abundance of Lactiplantibacillus was significantly higher in the IN-treated group than in other treatment groups (p < 0.05). A higher alfalfa mixing ratio improved the nutrient value, but also made fermentation more difficult. Inoculants improved the fermentation quality by increasing the abundance of Lactiplantibacillus. In conclusion, the groups M3 and M5 achieved the optimal balance of nutrients and fermentation. If a higher proportion of alfalfa needs to be used, it is recommended to use inoculants to ensure sufficient fermentation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9922753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99227532023-02-14 The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios Guan, Hao Li, Haiping Gan, Li Chen, Shiyong Yan, Yanhong Jia, Zhifeng Liu, Wenhui Wei, Xiaoxing Ma, Xiang Zhou, Qingping Front Microbiol Microbiology Mixing grass with legumes before ensiling is beneficial for improving dry matter and crude protein yield, but additional information is needed to balance nutrient content and fermentation quality. In this study, the microbial community, fermentation characteristics, and nutrient content of Napier grass mixed with alfalfa at different proportions were assessed. Tested proportions included: 100:0 (M0), 70:30 (M3), 50:50 (M5), 30:70 (M7), and 0:100 (MF). Treatments included: (CK) sterilized deionized water; (IN) selected lactic acid bacteria: Lactobacillus plantarum CGMCC 23166 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 18233 (1.5 × 10(5) cfu/g of fresh weight for each inoculant); and (CO) commercial lactic acid bacteria: L. plantarum (1 × 10(5) cfu/g of fresh weight). All mixtures were ensiled for 60 days. Data analysis was used as a completely randomized design with a 5-by-3 factorial arrangement of treatments. The results showed that with increasing alfalfa mixing ratio, dry matter, and crude protein increased, while neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber decreased both before and after ensiling (p < 0.05), which was not influenced by fermentation. Inoculation with IN and CO decreased pH and increased the lactic acid content compared to CK (p < 0.05), especially in silages M7 and MF. The highest Shannon index (6.24) and Simpson index (0.93) were observed in the MF silage CK treatment (p < 0.05). The relative abundance of Lactiplantibacillus decreased with increasing alfalfa mixing ratio, while the abundance of Lactiplantibacillus was significantly higher in the IN-treated group than in other treatment groups (p < 0.05). A higher alfalfa mixing ratio improved the nutrient value, but also made fermentation more difficult. Inoculants improved the fermentation quality by increasing the abundance of Lactiplantibacillus. In conclusion, the groups M3 and M5 achieved the optimal balance of nutrients and fermentation. If a higher proportion of alfalfa needs to be used, it is recommended to use inoculants to ensure sufficient fermentation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9922753/ /pubmed/36794009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1112058 Text en Copyright © 2023 Guan, Li, Gan, Chen, Yan, Jia, Liu, Wei, Ma and Zhou. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Guan, Hao Li, Haiping Gan, Li Chen, Shiyong Yan, Yanhong Jia, Zhifeng Liu, Wenhui Wei, Xiaoxing Ma, Xiang Zhou, Qingping The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios |
title | The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios |
title_full | The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios |
title_fullStr | The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios |
title_short | The effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of Napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios |
title_sort | effects of native lactic acid bacteria on the microbiome, fermentation profile, and nutritive value of napier grass silage prepared with different legume ratios |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36794009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1112058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guanhao theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT lihaiping theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT ganli theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT chenshiyong theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT yanyanhong theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT jiazhifeng theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT liuwenhui theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT weixiaoxing theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT maxiang theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT zhouqingping theeffectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT guanhao effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT lihaiping effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT ganli effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT chenshiyong effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT yanyanhong effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT jiazhifeng effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT liuwenhui effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT weixiaoxing effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT maxiang effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios AT zhouqingping effectsofnativelacticacidbacteriaonthemicrobiomefermentationprofileandnutritivevalueofnapiergrasssilagepreparedwithdifferentlegumeratios |