Cargando…

Functional and patient-reported outcomes of bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA): A prospective case series study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and patient-reported outcomes, and their correlation, after percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2020 in a tertiary care center. All...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azevedo, Cátia, Breda, Miguel, Ribeiro, Daniela, Mar, Fernando Milhazes, Vilarinho, Sérgio, Dias, Luís
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese PLA General Hospital 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9937820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2022.11.002
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and patient-reported outcomes, and their correlation, after percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2020 in a tertiary care center. All adult patients who were implanted with a percutaneous BAHA device during this evaluation period were included in the study. Complete auditory function and patients reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed in the preoperative period and 6 months after the implant activation. The PROMs included a generic form (Medical Outcome Study 36 Short Form Healthy Survey (MOS SF-36)), and three disease-specific forms (Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life Scale (SADLS), and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with an average age of 53 years were included in the study. The overall functional gain with the BAHA in sound-field pure tone average (PTA) was 29 dB, with no statistically significant differences according to surgical indication (F(3,18) = 2.319, p = 0.110). The greater the preoperative air-bone gap, the greater the functional gain obtained (r = 0.505, p < 0.05). In the PROMs, we found a significant improvement in HHI scores (p < 0.005) and a significant increase in overall SADLS scores (p < 0.05) with the use of percutaneous BAHA devices. We did not verify any statistically significant correlation between functional and PROMs results. CONCLUSIONS: The BAHA is a safe and effective alternative hearing rehabilitation option in selected patients. The PROMs results prove patient's overall satisfaction.