Cargando…

Comparison of Autof Ms1000 and EXS3000 MALDI-TOF MS Platforms for Routine Identification of Microorganisms

PURPOSE: Matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) has recently been widely used in clinical microbiology laboratories, with the advantages of being reliable, rapid, and cost-effective. Here, we reported the performance of two MALDI-TOF MS instruments,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Lijuan, Long, Xu, Ni, Lijun, Wang, Lili, Zhang, Yang, Cui, Lili, Guo, Jian, Yang, Chunying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36814830
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S352307
_version_ 1784890941221371904
author Xiong, Lijuan
Long, Xu
Ni, Lijun
Wang, Lili
Zhang, Yang
Cui, Lili
Guo, Jian
Yang, Chunying
author_facet Xiong, Lijuan
Long, Xu
Ni, Lijun
Wang, Lili
Zhang, Yang
Cui, Lili
Guo, Jian
Yang, Chunying
author_sort Xiong, Lijuan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) has recently been widely used in clinical microbiology laboratories, with the advantages of being reliable, rapid, and cost-effective. Here, we reported the performance of two MALDI-TOF MS instruments, EXS3000 (Zybio, China) and Autof ms1000 (Autobio, China), which are commonly used in clinical microbiology field. METHODS: A total of 209 common clinical common isolates, including 70 gram-negative bacteria strains, 58 gram-positive bacteria strains, 33 yeast strains, 15 anaerobic bacteria strains, and 33 mold strains, and 19 mycobacterial strains were tested. All strains were identified by EXS3000 (Zybio, China) and Autof ms1000 (Autobio, China). Sequence analysis of 16S rRNA or ITS regions was used to verify all strains. RESULTS: Current study found that species-level discrimination was found to be 191 (91.39%) and 190 (90.91%) by EXS3000 and Autof ms1000, respectively. Genus-level discrimination was 205 (98.09%) by the EXS3000 and 205 (98.09%) by the Autof ms1000, respectively. The correct results at species level of the EXS3000 were 91.43% (64/70) for gram-negative bacteria, 93.1% (54/58) for gram-positive cocci, 93.94% (31/33) for yeast, 100% (15/15) for anaerobes and 81.82% (27/33) for filamentous fungi. The correct results at species level of the Autof ms1000 were 92.86% (65/70) for gram-negative bacteria, 91.38% (53/58) for gram-positive cocci, 93.94% (31/33) for yeast, 100% (15/15) for anaerobes and 78.79% (26/33) for filamentous fungi. CONCLUSION: Although the results show that the EXS3000 and Autof ms1000 systems are equally good choices in terms of analytical efficiency for routine procedures, the test result of EXS3000 is slightly better than Autof ms1000. It’s worth mentioning that the target plate of the EXS 3000 instrument is reusable, but the target plate of the Autof ms1000 is disposable, making the EXS3000 more effective in reducing costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9939805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99398052023-02-21 Comparison of Autof Ms1000 and EXS3000 MALDI-TOF MS Platforms for Routine Identification of Microorganisms Xiong, Lijuan Long, Xu Ni, Lijun Wang, Lili Zhang, Yang Cui, Lili Guo, Jian Yang, Chunying Infect Drug Resist Original Research PURPOSE: Matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) has recently been widely used in clinical microbiology laboratories, with the advantages of being reliable, rapid, and cost-effective. Here, we reported the performance of two MALDI-TOF MS instruments, EXS3000 (Zybio, China) and Autof ms1000 (Autobio, China), which are commonly used in clinical microbiology field. METHODS: A total of 209 common clinical common isolates, including 70 gram-negative bacteria strains, 58 gram-positive bacteria strains, 33 yeast strains, 15 anaerobic bacteria strains, and 33 mold strains, and 19 mycobacterial strains were tested. All strains were identified by EXS3000 (Zybio, China) and Autof ms1000 (Autobio, China). Sequence analysis of 16S rRNA or ITS regions was used to verify all strains. RESULTS: Current study found that species-level discrimination was found to be 191 (91.39%) and 190 (90.91%) by EXS3000 and Autof ms1000, respectively. Genus-level discrimination was 205 (98.09%) by the EXS3000 and 205 (98.09%) by the Autof ms1000, respectively. The correct results at species level of the EXS3000 were 91.43% (64/70) for gram-negative bacteria, 93.1% (54/58) for gram-positive cocci, 93.94% (31/33) for yeast, 100% (15/15) for anaerobes and 81.82% (27/33) for filamentous fungi. The correct results at species level of the Autof ms1000 were 92.86% (65/70) for gram-negative bacteria, 91.38% (53/58) for gram-positive cocci, 93.94% (31/33) for yeast, 100% (15/15) for anaerobes and 78.79% (26/33) for filamentous fungi. CONCLUSION: Although the results show that the EXS3000 and Autof ms1000 systems are equally good choices in terms of analytical efficiency for routine procedures, the test result of EXS3000 is slightly better than Autof ms1000. It’s worth mentioning that the target plate of the EXS 3000 instrument is reusable, but the target plate of the Autof ms1000 is disposable, making the EXS3000 more effective in reducing costs. Dove 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9939805/ /pubmed/36814830 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S352307 Text en © 2023 Xiong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Xiong, Lijuan
Long, Xu
Ni, Lijun
Wang, Lili
Zhang, Yang
Cui, Lili
Guo, Jian
Yang, Chunying
Comparison of Autof Ms1000 and EXS3000 MALDI-TOF MS Platforms for Routine Identification of Microorganisms
title Comparison of Autof Ms1000 and EXS3000 MALDI-TOF MS Platforms for Routine Identification of Microorganisms
title_full Comparison of Autof Ms1000 and EXS3000 MALDI-TOF MS Platforms for Routine Identification of Microorganisms
title_fullStr Comparison of Autof Ms1000 and EXS3000 MALDI-TOF MS Platforms for Routine Identification of Microorganisms
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Autof Ms1000 and EXS3000 MALDI-TOF MS Platforms for Routine Identification of Microorganisms
title_short Comparison of Autof Ms1000 and EXS3000 MALDI-TOF MS Platforms for Routine Identification of Microorganisms
title_sort comparison of autof ms1000 and exs3000 maldi-tof ms platforms for routine identification of microorganisms
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9939805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36814830
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S352307
work_keys_str_mv AT xionglijuan comparisonofautofms1000andexs3000malditofmsplatformsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganisms
AT longxu comparisonofautofms1000andexs3000malditofmsplatformsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganisms
AT nilijun comparisonofautofms1000andexs3000malditofmsplatformsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganisms
AT wanglili comparisonofautofms1000andexs3000malditofmsplatformsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganisms
AT zhangyang comparisonofautofms1000andexs3000malditofmsplatformsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganisms
AT cuilili comparisonofautofms1000andexs3000malditofmsplatformsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganisms
AT guojian comparisonofautofms1000andexs3000malditofmsplatformsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganisms
AT yangchunying comparisonofautofms1000andexs3000malditofmsplatformsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganisms