Cargando…
Does multi-way, long-range chromatin contact data advance 3D genome reconstruction?
BACKGROUND: Methods for inferring the three-dimensional (3D) configuration of chromatin from conformation capture assays that provide strictly pairwise interactions, notably Hi-C, utilize the attendant contact matrix as input. More recent assays, in particular split-pool recognition of interactions...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9951495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36829114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-023-05170-x |
_version_ | 1784893400087003136 |
---|---|
author | Olshen, Adam B. Segal, Mark R. |
author_facet | Olshen, Adam B. Segal, Mark R. |
author_sort | Olshen, Adam B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Methods for inferring the three-dimensional (3D) configuration of chromatin from conformation capture assays that provide strictly pairwise interactions, notably Hi-C, utilize the attendant contact matrix as input. More recent assays, in particular split-pool recognition of interactions by tag extension (SPRITE), capture multi-way interactions instead of solely pairwise contacts. These assays yield contacts that straddle appreciably greater genomic distances than Hi-C, in addition to instances of exceptionally high-order chromatin interaction. Such attributes are anticipated to be consequential with respect to 3D genome reconstruction, a task yet to be undertaken with multi-way contact data. However, performing such 3D reconstruction using distance-based reconstruction techniques requires framing multi-way contacts as (pairwise) distances. Comparing approaches for so doing, and assessing the resultant impact of long-range and multi-way contacts, are the objectives of this study. RESULTS: We obtained 3D reconstructions via multi-dimensional scaling under a variety of weighting schemes for mapping SPRITE multi-way contacts to pairwise distances. Resultant configurations were compared following Procrustes alignment and relationships were assessed between associated Procrustes root mean square errors and key features such as the extent of multi-way and/or long-range contacts. We found that these features had surprisingly limited influence on 3D reconstruction, a finding we attribute to their influence being diminished by the preponderance of pairwise contacts. CONCLUSION: Distance-based 3D genome reconstruction using SPRITE multi-way contact data is not appreciably affected by the weighting scheme used to convert multi-way interactions to pairwise distances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9951495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99514952023-02-25 Does multi-way, long-range chromatin contact data advance 3D genome reconstruction? Olshen, Adam B. Segal, Mark R. BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: Methods for inferring the three-dimensional (3D) configuration of chromatin from conformation capture assays that provide strictly pairwise interactions, notably Hi-C, utilize the attendant contact matrix as input. More recent assays, in particular split-pool recognition of interactions by tag extension (SPRITE), capture multi-way interactions instead of solely pairwise contacts. These assays yield contacts that straddle appreciably greater genomic distances than Hi-C, in addition to instances of exceptionally high-order chromatin interaction. Such attributes are anticipated to be consequential with respect to 3D genome reconstruction, a task yet to be undertaken with multi-way contact data. However, performing such 3D reconstruction using distance-based reconstruction techniques requires framing multi-way contacts as (pairwise) distances. Comparing approaches for so doing, and assessing the resultant impact of long-range and multi-way contacts, are the objectives of this study. RESULTS: We obtained 3D reconstructions via multi-dimensional scaling under a variety of weighting schemes for mapping SPRITE multi-way contacts to pairwise distances. Resultant configurations were compared following Procrustes alignment and relationships were assessed between associated Procrustes root mean square errors and key features such as the extent of multi-way and/or long-range contacts. We found that these features had surprisingly limited influence on 3D reconstruction, a finding we attribute to their influence being diminished by the preponderance of pairwise contacts. CONCLUSION: Distance-based 3D genome reconstruction using SPRITE multi-way contact data is not appreciably affected by the weighting scheme used to convert multi-way interactions to pairwise distances. BioMed Central 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9951495/ /pubmed/36829114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-023-05170-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Olshen, Adam B. Segal, Mark R. Does multi-way, long-range chromatin contact data advance 3D genome reconstruction? |
title | Does multi-way, long-range chromatin contact data advance 3D genome reconstruction? |
title_full | Does multi-way, long-range chromatin contact data advance 3D genome reconstruction? |
title_fullStr | Does multi-way, long-range chromatin contact data advance 3D genome reconstruction? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does multi-way, long-range chromatin contact data advance 3D genome reconstruction? |
title_short | Does multi-way, long-range chromatin contact data advance 3D genome reconstruction? |
title_sort | does multi-way, long-range chromatin contact data advance 3d genome reconstruction? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9951495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36829114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-023-05170-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olshenadamb doesmultiwaylongrangechromatincontactdataadvance3dgenomereconstruction AT segalmarkr doesmultiwaylongrangechromatincontactdataadvance3dgenomereconstruction |