Cargando…

Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions

CTCF is a DNA-binding protein which plays critical roles in chromatin structure organization and transcriptional regulation; however, little is known about the functional determinants of different CTCF-binding sites (CBS). Using a conditional mouse model, we have identified one set of CBSs that are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marina-Zárate, Ester, Rodríguez-Ronchel, Ana, Gómez, Manuel J., Sánchez-Cabo, Fátima, Ramiro, Almudena R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106106
_version_ 1784895009366999040
author Marina-Zárate, Ester
Rodríguez-Ronchel, Ana
Gómez, Manuel J.
Sánchez-Cabo, Fátima
Ramiro, Almudena R.
author_facet Marina-Zárate, Ester
Rodríguez-Ronchel, Ana
Gómez, Manuel J.
Sánchez-Cabo, Fátima
Ramiro, Almudena R.
author_sort Marina-Zárate, Ester
collection PubMed
description CTCF is a DNA-binding protein which plays critical roles in chromatin structure organization and transcriptional regulation; however, little is known about the functional determinants of different CTCF-binding sites (CBS). Using a conditional mouse model, we have identified one set of CBSs that are lost upon CTCF depletion (lost CBSs) and another set that persists (retained CBSs). Retained CBSs are more similar to the consensus CTCF-binding sequence and usually span tandem CTCF peaks. Lost CBSs are enriched at enhancers and promoters and associate with active chromatin marks and higher transcriptional activity. In contrast, retained CBSs are enriched at TAD and loop boundaries. Integration of ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data has revealed that retained CBSs are located at the boundaries between distinct chromatin states, acting as chromatin barriers. Our results provide evidence that transient, lost CBSs are involved in transcriptional regulation, whereas retained CBSs are critical for establishing higher-order chromatin architecture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9958374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99583742023-02-26 Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions Marina-Zárate, Ester Rodríguez-Ronchel, Ana Gómez, Manuel J. Sánchez-Cabo, Fátima Ramiro, Almudena R. iScience Article CTCF is a DNA-binding protein which plays critical roles in chromatin structure organization and transcriptional regulation; however, little is known about the functional determinants of different CTCF-binding sites (CBS). Using a conditional mouse model, we have identified one set of CBSs that are lost upon CTCF depletion (lost CBSs) and another set that persists (retained CBSs). Retained CBSs are more similar to the consensus CTCF-binding sequence and usually span tandem CTCF peaks. Lost CBSs are enriched at enhancers and promoters and associate with active chromatin marks and higher transcriptional activity. In contrast, retained CBSs are enriched at TAD and loop boundaries. Integration of ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data has revealed that retained CBSs are located at the boundaries between distinct chromatin states, acting as chromatin barriers. Our results provide evidence that transient, lost CBSs are involved in transcriptional regulation, whereas retained CBSs are critical for establishing higher-order chromatin architecture. Elsevier 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9958374/ /pubmed/36852270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106106 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Marina-Zárate, Ester
Rodríguez-Ronchel, Ana
Gómez, Manuel J.
Sánchez-Cabo, Fátima
Ramiro, Almudena R.
Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions
title Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions
title_full Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions
title_fullStr Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions
title_full_unstemmed Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions
title_short Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions
title_sort low-affinity ctcf binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106106
work_keys_str_mv AT marinazarateester lowaffinityctcfbindingdrivestranscriptionalregulationwhereashighaffinitybindingencompassesarchitecturalfunctions
AT rodriguezronchelana lowaffinityctcfbindingdrivestranscriptionalregulationwhereashighaffinitybindingencompassesarchitecturalfunctions
AT gomezmanuelj lowaffinityctcfbindingdrivestranscriptionalregulationwhereashighaffinitybindingencompassesarchitecturalfunctions
AT sanchezcabofatima lowaffinityctcfbindingdrivestranscriptionalregulationwhereashighaffinitybindingencompassesarchitecturalfunctions
AT ramiroalmudenar lowaffinityctcfbindingdrivestranscriptionalregulationwhereashighaffinitybindingencompassesarchitecturalfunctions