Cargando…
Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions
CTCF is a DNA-binding protein which plays critical roles in chromatin structure organization and transcriptional regulation; however, little is known about the functional determinants of different CTCF-binding sites (CBS). Using a conditional mouse model, we have identified one set of CBSs that are...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106106 |
_version_ | 1784895009366999040 |
---|---|
author | Marina-Zárate, Ester Rodríguez-Ronchel, Ana Gómez, Manuel J. Sánchez-Cabo, Fátima Ramiro, Almudena R. |
author_facet | Marina-Zárate, Ester Rodríguez-Ronchel, Ana Gómez, Manuel J. Sánchez-Cabo, Fátima Ramiro, Almudena R. |
author_sort | Marina-Zárate, Ester |
collection | PubMed |
description | CTCF is a DNA-binding protein which plays critical roles in chromatin structure organization and transcriptional regulation; however, little is known about the functional determinants of different CTCF-binding sites (CBS). Using a conditional mouse model, we have identified one set of CBSs that are lost upon CTCF depletion (lost CBSs) and another set that persists (retained CBSs). Retained CBSs are more similar to the consensus CTCF-binding sequence and usually span tandem CTCF peaks. Lost CBSs are enriched at enhancers and promoters and associate with active chromatin marks and higher transcriptional activity. In contrast, retained CBSs are enriched at TAD and loop boundaries. Integration of ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data has revealed that retained CBSs are located at the boundaries between distinct chromatin states, acting as chromatin barriers. Our results provide evidence that transient, lost CBSs are involved in transcriptional regulation, whereas retained CBSs are critical for establishing higher-order chromatin architecture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9958374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99583742023-02-26 Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions Marina-Zárate, Ester Rodríguez-Ronchel, Ana Gómez, Manuel J. Sánchez-Cabo, Fátima Ramiro, Almudena R. iScience Article CTCF is a DNA-binding protein which plays critical roles in chromatin structure organization and transcriptional regulation; however, little is known about the functional determinants of different CTCF-binding sites (CBS). Using a conditional mouse model, we have identified one set of CBSs that are lost upon CTCF depletion (lost CBSs) and another set that persists (retained CBSs). Retained CBSs are more similar to the consensus CTCF-binding sequence and usually span tandem CTCF peaks. Lost CBSs are enriched at enhancers and promoters and associate with active chromatin marks and higher transcriptional activity. In contrast, retained CBSs are enriched at TAD and loop boundaries. Integration of ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data has revealed that retained CBSs are located at the boundaries between distinct chromatin states, acting as chromatin barriers. Our results provide evidence that transient, lost CBSs are involved in transcriptional regulation, whereas retained CBSs are critical for establishing higher-order chromatin architecture. Elsevier 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9958374/ /pubmed/36852270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106106 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Marina-Zárate, Ester Rodríguez-Ronchel, Ana Gómez, Manuel J. Sánchez-Cabo, Fátima Ramiro, Almudena R. Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions |
title | Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions |
title_full | Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions |
title_fullStr | Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions |
title_full_unstemmed | Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions |
title_short | Low-affinity CTCF binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions |
title_sort | low-affinity ctcf binding drives transcriptional regulation whereas high-affinity binding encompasses architectural functions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9958374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36852270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marinazarateester lowaffinityctcfbindingdrivestranscriptionalregulationwhereashighaffinitybindingencompassesarchitecturalfunctions AT rodriguezronchelana lowaffinityctcfbindingdrivestranscriptionalregulationwhereashighaffinitybindingencompassesarchitecturalfunctions AT gomezmanuelj lowaffinityctcfbindingdrivestranscriptionalregulationwhereashighaffinitybindingencompassesarchitecturalfunctions AT sanchezcabofatima lowaffinityctcfbindingdrivestranscriptionalregulationwhereashighaffinitybindingencompassesarchitecturalfunctions AT ramiroalmudenar lowaffinityctcfbindingdrivestranscriptionalregulationwhereashighaffinitybindingencompassesarchitecturalfunctions |