Cargando…

Processed meat, red meat, white meat, and digestive tract cancers: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND: Previous observational studies suggested inconsistent insights on the associations between meat intake and the risk of digestive tract cancers (DCTs). The causal effect of meat intake on DCTs is unclear. METHODS: Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was performed based on genome-wide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yun, Zhangjun, Nan, Mengdie, Li, Xiao, Liu, Zhu, Xu, Jing, Du, Xiaofeng, Dong, Qing, Hou, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9968810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860687
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1078963
_version_ 1784897578950721536
author Yun, Zhangjun
Nan, Mengdie
Li, Xiao
Liu, Zhu
Xu, Jing
Du, Xiaofeng
Dong, Qing
Hou, Li
author_facet Yun, Zhangjun
Nan, Mengdie
Li, Xiao
Liu, Zhu
Xu, Jing
Du, Xiaofeng
Dong, Qing
Hou, Li
author_sort Yun, Zhangjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous observational studies suggested inconsistent insights on the associations between meat intake and the risk of digestive tract cancers (DCTs). The causal effect of meat intake on DCTs is unclear. METHODS: Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was performed based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data from UK Biobank and FinnGen to evaluate the causal effect of meat intake [processed meat, red meat (pork, beef, and lamb), and white meat (poultry)] on DCTs (esophageal, stomach, liver, biliary tract, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers). The causal effects were estimated using a primary analysis that employed inverse-variance weighting (IVW) and complementary analysis that utilized MR-Egger weighted by the median. A sensitivity analysis was conducted using the Cochran Q statistic, a funnel plot, the MR-Egger intercept, and a leave-one-out approach. MR-PRESSO and Radial MR were performed to identify and remove outliers. To demonstrate direct causal effects, multivariable MR (MVMR) was applied. In addition, risk factors were introduced to explore potential mediators of the relationship between exposure and outcome. RESULTS: The results of the univariable MR analysis indicated that genetically proxied processed meat intake was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer [IVW: odds ratio (OR) = 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07–4.19; P = 0.031]. The causal effect is consistent in MVMR (OR = 3.85, 95% CI 1.14–13.04; P = 0.030) after controlling for the influence of other types of exposure. The body mass index and total cholesterol did not mediate the causal effects described above. There was no evidence to support the causal effects of processed meat intake on other cancers, except for colorectal cancer. Similarly, there is no causal association between red meat, white meat intake, and DCTs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reported that processed meat intake increases the risk of colorectal cancer rather than other DCTs. No causal relationship was observed between red and white meat intake and DCTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9968810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99688102023-02-28 Processed meat, red meat, white meat, and digestive tract cancers: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study Yun, Zhangjun Nan, Mengdie Li, Xiao Liu, Zhu Xu, Jing Du, Xiaofeng Dong, Qing Hou, Li Front Nutr Nutrition BACKGROUND: Previous observational studies suggested inconsistent insights on the associations between meat intake and the risk of digestive tract cancers (DCTs). The causal effect of meat intake on DCTs is unclear. METHODS: Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was performed based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data from UK Biobank and FinnGen to evaluate the causal effect of meat intake [processed meat, red meat (pork, beef, and lamb), and white meat (poultry)] on DCTs (esophageal, stomach, liver, biliary tract, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers). The causal effects were estimated using a primary analysis that employed inverse-variance weighting (IVW) and complementary analysis that utilized MR-Egger weighted by the median. A sensitivity analysis was conducted using the Cochran Q statistic, a funnel plot, the MR-Egger intercept, and a leave-one-out approach. MR-PRESSO and Radial MR were performed to identify and remove outliers. To demonstrate direct causal effects, multivariable MR (MVMR) was applied. In addition, risk factors were introduced to explore potential mediators of the relationship between exposure and outcome. RESULTS: The results of the univariable MR analysis indicated that genetically proxied processed meat intake was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer [IVW: odds ratio (OR) = 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07–4.19; P = 0.031]. The causal effect is consistent in MVMR (OR = 3.85, 95% CI 1.14–13.04; P = 0.030) after controlling for the influence of other types of exposure. The body mass index and total cholesterol did not mediate the causal effects described above. There was no evidence to support the causal effects of processed meat intake on other cancers, except for colorectal cancer. Similarly, there is no causal association between red meat, white meat intake, and DCTs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reported that processed meat intake increases the risk of colorectal cancer rather than other DCTs. No causal relationship was observed between red and white meat intake and DCTs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9968810/ /pubmed/36860687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1078963 Text en Copyright © 2023 Yun, Nan, Li, Liu, Xu, Du, Dong and Hou. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Yun, Zhangjun
Nan, Mengdie
Li, Xiao
Liu, Zhu
Xu, Jing
Du, Xiaofeng
Dong, Qing
Hou, Li
Processed meat, red meat, white meat, and digestive tract cancers: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study
title Processed meat, red meat, white meat, and digestive tract cancers: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study
title_full Processed meat, red meat, white meat, and digestive tract cancers: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study
title_fullStr Processed meat, red meat, white meat, and digestive tract cancers: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study
title_full_unstemmed Processed meat, red meat, white meat, and digestive tract cancers: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study
title_short Processed meat, red meat, white meat, and digestive tract cancers: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study
title_sort processed meat, red meat, white meat, and digestive tract cancers: a two-sample mendelian randomization study
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9968810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36860687
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1078963
work_keys_str_mv AT yunzhangjun processedmeatredmeatwhitemeatanddigestivetractcancersatwosamplemendelianrandomizationstudy
AT nanmengdie processedmeatredmeatwhitemeatanddigestivetractcancersatwosamplemendelianrandomizationstudy
AT lixiao processedmeatredmeatwhitemeatanddigestivetractcancersatwosamplemendelianrandomizationstudy
AT liuzhu processedmeatredmeatwhitemeatanddigestivetractcancersatwosamplemendelianrandomizationstudy
AT xujing processedmeatredmeatwhitemeatanddigestivetractcancersatwosamplemendelianrandomizationstudy
AT duxiaofeng processedmeatredmeatwhitemeatanddigestivetractcancersatwosamplemendelianrandomizationstudy
AT dongqing processedmeatredmeatwhitemeatanddigestivetractcancersatwosamplemendelianrandomizationstudy
AT houli processedmeatredmeatwhitemeatanddigestivetractcancersatwosamplemendelianrandomizationstudy