Cargando…
Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions
MOTIVATION: Here, we performed a benchmarking analysis of five tools for microbe sequence detection using transcriptomics data (Kraken2, MetaPhlAn2, PathSeq, DRAC and Pandora). We built a synthetic database mimicking real-world structure with tuned conditions accounting for microbe species prevalenc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbad014 |
_version_ | 1784899194845134848 |
---|---|
author | Jurado-Rueda, Francisco Alonso-Guirado, Lola Perea-Cham-blee, Tomin E Elliott, Oliver T Filip, Ioan Rabadán, Raúl Malats, Núria |
author_facet | Jurado-Rueda, Francisco Alonso-Guirado, Lola Perea-Cham-blee, Tomin E Elliott, Oliver T Filip, Ioan Rabadán, Raúl Malats, Núria |
author_sort | Jurado-Rueda, Francisco |
collection | PubMed |
description | MOTIVATION: Here, we performed a benchmarking analysis of five tools for microbe sequence detection using transcriptomics data (Kraken2, MetaPhlAn2, PathSeq, DRAC and Pandora). We built a synthetic database mimicking real-world structure with tuned conditions accounting for microbe species prevalence, base calling quality and sequence length. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) parameters, as well as computational requirements, were used for tool ranking. RESULTS: GATK PathSeq showed the highest sensitivity on average and across all scenarios considered. However, the main drawback of this tool was its slowness. Kraken2 was the fastest tool and displayed the second-best sensitivity, though with large variance depending on the species to be classified. There was no significant difference for the other three algorithms sensitivity. The sensitivity of MetaPhlAn2 and Pandora was affected by sequence number and DRAC by sequence quality and length. Results from this study support the use of Kraken2 for routine microbiome profiling based on its competitive sensitivity and runtime performance. Nonetheless, we strongly endorse to complement it by combining with MetaPhlAn2 for thorough taxonomic analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/fjuradorueda/MIME/ and https://github.com/lola4/DRAC/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9976984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99769842023-03-02 Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions Jurado-Rueda, Francisco Alonso-Guirado, Lola Perea-Cham-blee, Tomin E Elliott, Oliver T Filip, Ioan Rabadán, Raúl Malats, Núria Bioinform Adv Original Article MOTIVATION: Here, we performed a benchmarking analysis of five tools for microbe sequence detection using transcriptomics data (Kraken2, MetaPhlAn2, PathSeq, DRAC and Pandora). We built a synthetic database mimicking real-world structure with tuned conditions accounting for microbe species prevalence, base calling quality and sequence length. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) parameters, as well as computational requirements, were used for tool ranking. RESULTS: GATK PathSeq showed the highest sensitivity on average and across all scenarios considered. However, the main drawback of this tool was its slowness. Kraken2 was the fastest tool and displayed the second-best sensitivity, though with large variance depending on the species to be classified. There was no significant difference for the other three algorithms sensitivity. The sensitivity of MetaPhlAn2 and Pandora was affected by sequence number and DRAC by sequence quality and length. Results from this study support the use of Kraken2 for routine microbiome profiling based on its competitive sensitivity and runtime performance. Nonetheless, we strongly endorse to complement it by combining with MetaPhlAn2 for thorough taxonomic analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/fjuradorueda/MIME/ and https://github.com/lola4/DRAC/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online. Oxford University Press 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9976984/ /pubmed/36874954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbad014 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jurado-Rueda, Francisco Alonso-Guirado, Lola Perea-Cham-blee, Tomin E Elliott, Oliver T Filip, Ioan Rabadán, Raúl Malats, Núria Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions |
title | Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions |
title_full | Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions |
title_short | Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions |
title_sort | benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on rna-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbad014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juradoruedafrancisco benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions AT alonsoguiradolola benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions AT pereachambleetomine benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions AT elliottolivert benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions AT filipioan benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions AT rabadanraul benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions AT malatsnuria benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions |