Cargando…

Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions

MOTIVATION: Here, we performed a benchmarking analysis of five tools for microbe sequence detection using transcriptomics data (Kraken2, MetaPhlAn2, PathSeq, DRAC and Pandora). We built a synthetic database mimicking real-world structure with tuned conditions accounting for microbe species prevalenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jurado-Rueda, Francisco, Alonso-Guirado, Lola, Perea-Cham-blee, Tomin E, Elliott, Oliver T, Filip, Ioan, Rabadán, Raúl, Malats, Núria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbad014
_version_ 1784899194845134848
author Jurado-Rueda, Francisco
Alonso-Guirado, Lola
Perea-Cham-blee, Tomin E
Elliott, Oliver T
Filip, Ioan
Rabadán, Raúl
Malats, Núria
author_facet Jurado-Rueda, Francisco
Alonso-Guirado, Lola
Perea-Cham-blee, Tomin E
Elliott, Oliver T
Filip, Ioan
Rabadán, Raúl
Malats, Núria
author_sort Jurado-Rueda, Francisco
collection PubMed
description MOTIVATION: Here, we performed a benchmarking analysis of five tools for microbe sequence detection using transcriptomics data (Kraken2, MetaPhlAn2, PathSeq, DRAC and Pandora). We built a synthetic database mimicking real-world structure with tuned conditions accounting for microbe species prevalence, base calling quality and sequence length. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) parameters, as well as computational requirements, were used for tool ranking. RESULTS: GATK PathSeq showed the highest sensitivity on average and across all scenarios considered. However, the main drawback of this tool was its slowness. Kraken2 was the fastest tool and displayed the second-best sensitivity, though with large variance depending on the species to be classified. There was no significant difference for the other three algorithms sensitivity. The sensitivity of MetaPhlAn2 and Pandora was affected by sequence number and DRAC by sequence quality and length. Results from this study support the use of Kraken2 for routine microbiome profiling based on its competitive sensitivity and runtime performance. Nonetheless, we strongly endorse to complement it by combining with MetaPhlAn2 for thorough taxonomic analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/fjuradorueda/MIME/ and https://github.com/lola4/DRAC/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9976984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99769842023-03-02 Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions Jurado-Rueda, Francisco Alonso-Guirado, Lola Perea-Cham-blee, Tomin E Elliott, Oliver T Filip, Ioan Rabadán, Raúl Malats, Núria Bioinform Adv Original Article MOTIVATION: Here, we performed a benchmarking analysis of five tools for microbe sequence detection using transcriptomics data (Kraken2, MetaPhlAn2, PathSeq, DRAC and Pandora). We built a synthetic database mimicking real-world structure with tuned conditions accounting for microbe species prevalence, base calling quality and sequence length. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) parameters, as well as computational requirements, were used for tool ranking. RESULTS: GATK PathSeq showed the highest sensitivity on average and across all scenarios considered. However, the main drawback of this tool was its slowness. Kraken2 was the fastest tool and displayed the second-best sensitivity, though with large variance depending on the species to be classified. There was no significant difference for the other three algorithms sensitivity. The sensitivity of MetaPhlAn2 and Pandora was affected by sequence number and DRAC by sequence quality and length. Results from this study support the use of Kraken2 for routine microbiome profiling based on its competitive sensitivity and runtime performance. Nonetheless, we strongly endorse to complement it by combining with MetaPhlAn2 for thorough taxonomic analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/fjuradorueda/MIME/ and https://github.com/lola4/DRAC/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online. Oxford University Press 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9976984/ /pubmed/36874954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbad014 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jurado-Rueda, Francisco
Alonso-Guirado, Lola
Perea-Cham-blee, Tomin E
Elliott, Oliver T
Filip, Ioan
Rabadán, Raúl
Malats, Núria
Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions
title Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions
title_full Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions
title_fullStr Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions
title_short Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions
title_sort benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on rna-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36874954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbad014
work_keys_str_mv AT juradoruedafrancisco benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions
AT alonsoguiradolola benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions
AT pereachambleetomine benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions
AT elliottolivert benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions
AT filipioan benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions
AT rabadanraul benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions
AT malatsnuria benchmarkingofmicrobiomedetectiontoolsonrnaseqsyntheticdatabasesaccordingtodiverseconditions