Cargando…

Gaze onsets during naturalistic infant-caregiver interaction associate with ‘sender’ but not ‘receiver’ neural responses, and do not lead to changes in inter-brain synchrony

Temporal coordination during infant-caregiver social interaction is thought to be crucial for supporting early language acquisition and cognitive development. Despite a growing prevalence of theories suggesting that increased inter-brain synchrony associates with many key aspects of social interacti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marriott Haresign, I., Phillips, E. A. M., Whitehorn, M., Lamagna, F., Eliano, M., Goupil, L., Jones, E. J. H., Wass, S. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28988-0
_version_ 1784900140333531136
author Marriott Haresign, I.
Phillips, E. A. M.
Whitehorn, M.
Lamagna, F.
Eliano, M.
Goupil, L.
Jones, E. J. H.
Wass, S. V.
author_facet Marriott Haresign, I.
Phillips, E. A. M.
Whitehorn, M.
Lamagna, F.
Eliano, M.
Goupil, L.
Jones, E. J. H.
Wass, S. V.
author_sort Marriott Haresign, I.
collection PubMed
description Temporal coordination during infant-caregiver social interaction is thought to be crucial for supporting early language acquisition and cognitive development. Despite a growing prevalence of theories suggesting that increased inter-brain synchrony associates with many key aspects of social interactions such as mutual gaze, little is known about how this arises during development. Here, we investigated the role of mutual gaze onsets as a potential driver of inter-brain synchrony. We extracted dual EEG activity around naturally occurring gaze onsets during infant-caregiver social interactions in N = 55 dyads (mean age 12 months). We differentiated between two types of gaze onset, depending on each partners’ role. ‘Sender’ gaze onsets were defined at a time when either the adult or the infant made a gaze shift towards their partner at a time when their partner was either already looking at them (mutual) or not looking at them (non-mutual). ‘Receiver’ gaze onsets were defined at a time when their partner made a gaze shift towards them at a time when either the adult or the infant was already looking at their partner (mutual) or not (non-mutual). Contrary to our hypothesis we found that, during a naturalistic interaction, both mutual and non-mutual gaze onsets were associated with changes in the sender, but not the receiver’s brain activity and were not associated with increases in inter-brain synchrony above baseline. Further, we found that mutual, compared to non-mutual gaze onsets were not associated with increased inter brain synchrony. Overall, our results suggest that the effects of mutual gaze are strongest at the intra-brain level, in the ‘sender’ but not the ‘receiver’ of the mutual gaze.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9981599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99815992023-03-04 Gaze onsets during naturalistic infant-caregiver interaction associate with ‘sender’ but not ‘receiver’ neural responses, and do not lead to changes in inter-brain synchrony Marriott Haresign, I. Phillips, E. A. M. Whitehorn, M. Lamagna, F. Eliano, M. Goupil, L. Jones, E. J. H. Wass, S. V. Sci Rep Article Temporal coordination during infant-caregiver social interaction is thought to be crucial for supporting early language acquisition and cognitive development. Despite a growing prevalence of theories suggesting that increased inter-brain synchrony associates with many key aspects of social interactions such as mutual gaze, little is known about how this arises during development. Here, we investigated the role of mutual gaze onsets as a potential driver of inter-brain synchrony. We extracted dual EEG activity around naturally occurring gaze onsets during infant-caregiver social interactions in N = 55 dyads (mean age 12 months). We differentiated between two types of gaze onset, depending on each partners’ role. ‘Sender’ gaze onsets were defined at a time when either the adult or the infant made a gaze shift towards their partner at a time when their partner was either already looking at them (mutual) or not looking at them (non-mutual). ‘Receiver’ gaze onsets were defined at a time when their partner made a gaze shift towards them at a time when either the adult or the infant was already looking at their partner (mutual) or not (non-mutual). Contrary to our hypothesis we found that, during a naturalistic interaction, both mutual and non-mutual gaze onsets were associated with changes in the sender, but not the receiver’s brain activity and were not associated with increases in inter-brain synchrony above baseline. Further, we found that mutual, compared to non-mutual gaze onsets were not associated with increased inter brain synchrony. Overall, our results suggest that the effects of mutual gaze are strongest at the intra-brain level, in the ‘sender’ but not the ‘receiver’ of the mutual gaze. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9981599/ /pubmed/36864074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28988-0 Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Marriott Haresign, I.
Phillips, E. A. M.
Whitehorn, M.
Lamagna, F.
Eliano, M.
Goupil, L.
Jones, E. J. H.
Wass, S. V.
Gaze onsets during naturalistic infant-caregiver interaction associate with ‘sender’ but not ‘receiver’ neural responses, and do not lead to changes in inter-brain synchrony
title Gaze onsets during naturalistic infant-caregiver interaction associate with ‘sender’ but not ‘receiver’ neural responses, and do not lead to changes in inter-brain synchrony
title_full Gaze onsets during naturalistic infant-caregiver interaction associate with ‘sender’ but not ‘receiver’ neural responses, and do not lead to changes in inter-brain synchrony
title_fullStr Gaze onsets during naturalistic infant-caregiver interaction associate with ‘sender’ but not ‘receiver’ neural responses, and do not lead to changes in inter-brain synchrony
title_full_unstemmed Gaze onsets during naturalistic infant-caregiver interaction associate with ‘sender’ but not ‘receiver’ neural responses, and do not lead to changes in inter-brain synchrony
title_short Gaze onsets during naturalistic infant-caregiver interaction associate with ‘sender’ but not ‘receiver’ neural responses, and do not lead to changes in inter-brain synchrony
title_sort gaze onsets during naturalistic infant-caregiver interaction associate with ‘sender’ but not ‘receiver’ neural responses, and do not lead to changes in inter-brain synchrony
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9981599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28988-0
work_keys_str_mv AT marriottharesigni gazeonsetsduringnaturalisticinfantcaregiverinteractionassociatewithsenderbutnotreceiverneuralresponsesanddonotleadtochangesininterbrainsynchrony
AT phillipseam gazeonsetsduringnaturalisticinfantcaregiverinteractionassociatewithsenderbutnotreceiverneuralresponsesanddonotleadtochangesininterbrainsynchrony
AT whitehornm gazeonsetsduringnaturalisticinfantcaregiverinteractionassociatewithsenderbutnotreceiverneuralresponsesanddonotleadtochangesininterbrainsynchrony
AT lamagnaf gazeonsetsduringnaturalisticinfantcaregiverinteractionassociatewithsenderbutnotreceiverneuralresponsesanddonotleadtochangesininterbrainsynchrony
AT elianom gazeonsetsduringnaturalisticinfantcaregiverinteractionassociatewithsenderbutnotreceiverneuralresponsesanddonotleadtochangesininterbrainsynchrony
AT goupill gazeonsetsduringnaturalisticinfantcaregiverinteractionassociatewithsenderbutnotreceiverneuralresponsesanddonotleadtochangesininterbrainsynchrony
AT jonesejh gazeonsetsduringnaturalisticinfantcaregiverinteractionassociatewithsenderbutnotreceiverneuralresponsesanddonotleadtochangesininterbrainsynchrony
AT wasssv gazeonsetsduringnaturalisticinfantcaregiverinteractionassociatewithsenderbutnotreceiverneuralresponsesanddonotleadtochangesininterbrainsynchrony