Cargando…
Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index
OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess Germany’s nutrition policies, to benchmark them against international best practices and to identify priority policy actions to improve population-level nutrition in Germany. DESIGN: We applied the Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI), a methodological framewo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021004742 |
_version_ | 1784902206313463808 |
---|---|
author | von Philipsborn, Peter Geffert, Karin Klinger, Carmen Hebestreit, Antje Stratil, Jan Rehfuess, Eva Annette |
author_facet | von Philipsborn, Peter Geffert, Karin Klinger, Carmen Hebestreit, Antje Stratil, Jan Rehfuess, Eva Annette |
author_sort | von Philipsborn, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess Germany’s nutrition policies, to benchmark them against international best practices and to identify priority policy actions to improve population-level nutrition in Germany. DESIGN: We applied the Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI), a methodological framework developed by the International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable Diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) network. Qualitative content analysis of laws, directives and other documents formed the basis of a multistaged, structured consultation process. SETTING: Germany. PARTICIPANTS: The expert consultation process included fifty-five experts from academia, public administration and civil society. RESULTS: Germany lags behind international best practices in several key policy areas. For eighteen policy indicators, the degree of implementation compared with international best practices was rated as very low, for twenty-one as low, for eight as intermediate and for none as high. In particular, indicators on food taxation, regulation of food marketing as well as retail and food service sector policies were rated as very low to low. Identified priority actions included the binding implementation of nutrition standards for schools and kindergartens, a reform of the value added tax on foods and beverages, a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and stricter regulation of food marketing directed at children. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that Germany makes insufficient use of the potential of evidence-informed health-promoting nutrition policies. Adopting international best practices in key policy areas could help to reduce the burden of nutrition-related chronic disease and related inequalities in nutrition and health in Germany. Implementation of relevant policies requires political leadership, a broad societal dialogue and evidence-informed advocacy by civil society, including the scientific community. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9991688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99916882023-03-08 Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index von Philipsborn, Peter Geffert, Karin Klinger, Carmen Hebestreit, Antje Stratil, Jan Rehfuess, Eva Annette Public Health Nutr Research Paper OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess Germany’s nutrition policies, to benchmark them against international best practices and to identify priority policy actions to improve population-level nutrition in Germany. DESIGN: We applied the Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI), a methodological framework developed by the International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable Diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) network. Qualitative content analysis of laws, directives and other documents formed the basis of a multistaged, structured consultation process. SETTING: Germany. PARTICIPANTS: The expert consultation process included fifty-five experts from academia, public administration and civil society. RESULTS: Germany lags behind international best practices in several key policy areas. For eighteen policy indicators, the degree of implementation compared with international best practices was rated as very low, for twenty-one as low, for eight as intermediate and for none as high. In particular, indicators on food taxation, regulation of food marketing as well as retail and food service sector policies were rated as very low to low. Identified priority actions included the binding implementation of nutrition standards for schools and kindergartens, a reform of the value added tax on foods and beverages, a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and stricter regulation of food marketing directed at children. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that Germany makes insufficient use of the potential of evidence-informed health-promoting nutrition policies. Adopting international best practices in key policy areas could help to reduce the burden of nutrition-related chronic disease and related inequalities in nutrition and health in Germany. Implementation of relevant policies requires political leadership, a broad societal dialogue and evidence-informed advocacy by civil society, including the scientific community. Cambridge University Press 2022-06 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9991688/ /pubmed/34881689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021004742 Text en © The Authors 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper von Philipsborn, Peter Geffert, Karin Klinger, Carmen Hebestreit, Antje Stratil, Jan Rehfuess, Eva Annette Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index |
title | Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index |
title_full | Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index |
title_fullStr | Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index |
title_full_unstemmed | Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index |
title_short | Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index |
title_sort | nutrition policies in germany: a systematic assessment with the food environment policy index |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021004742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vonphilipsbornpeter nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex AT geffertkarin nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex AT klingercarmen nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex AT hebestreitantje nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex AT stratiljan nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex AT rehfuessevaannette nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex AT nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex |