Cargando…

Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index

OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess Germany’s nutrition policies, to benchmark them against international best practices and to identify priority policy actions to improve population-level nutrition in Germany. DESIGN: We applied the Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI), a methodological framewo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Philipsborn, Peter, Geffert, Karin, Klinger, Carmen, Hebestreit, Antje, Stratil, Jan, Rehfuess, Eva Annette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021004742
_version_ 1784902206313463808
author von Philipsborn, Peter
Geffert, Karin
Klinger, Carmen
Hebestreit, Antje
Stratil, Jan
Rehfuess, Eva Annette
author_facet von Philipsborn, Peter
Geffert, Karin
Klinger, Carmen
Hebestreit, Antje
Stratil, Jan
Rehfuess, Eva Annette
author_sort von Philipsborn, Peter
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess Germany’s nutrition policies, to benchmark them against international best practices and to identify priority policy actions to improve population-level nutrition in Germany. DESIGN: We applied the Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI), a methodological framework developed by the International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable Diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) network. Qualitative content analysis of laws, directives and other documents formed the basis of a multistaged, structured consultation process. SETTING: Germany. PARTICIPANTS: The expert consultation process included fifty-five experts from academia, public administration and civil society. RESULTS: Germany lags behind international best practices in several key policy areas. For eighteen policy indicators, the degree of implementation compared with international best practices was rated as very low, for twenty-one as low, for eight as intermediate and for none as high. In particular, indicators on food taxation, regulation of food marketing as well as retail and food service sector policies were rated as very low to low. Identified priority actions included the binding implementation of nutrition standards for schools and kindergartens, a reform of the value added tax on foods and beverages, a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and stricter regulation of food marketing directed at children. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that Germany makes insufficient use of the potential of evidence-informed health-promoting nutrition policies. Adopting international best practices in key policy areas could help to reduce the burden of nutrition-related chronic disease and related inequalities in nutrition and health in Germany. Implementation of relevant policies requires political leadership, a broad societal dialogue and evidence-informed advocacy by civil society, including the scientific community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9991688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99916882023-03-08 Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index von Philipsborn, Peter Geffert, Karin Klinger, Carmen Hebestreit, Antje Stratil, Jan Rehfuess, Eva Annette Public Health Nutr Research Paper OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess Germany’s nutrition policies, to benchmark them against international best practices and to identify priority policy actions to improve population-level nutrition in Germany. DESIGN: We applied the Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI), a methodological framework developed by the International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable Diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) network. Qualitative content analysis of laws, directives and other documents formed the basis of a multistaged, structured consultation process. SETTING: Germany. PARTICIPANTS: The expert consultation process included fifty-five experts from academia, public administration and civil society. RESULTS: Germany lags behind international best practices in several key policy areas. For eighteen policy indicators, the degree of implementation compared with international best practices was rated as very low, for twenty-one as low, for eight as intermediate and for none as high. In particular, indicators on food taxation, regulation of food marketing as well as retail and food service sector policies were rated as very low to low. Identified priority actions included the binding implementation of nutrition standards for schools and kindergartens, a reform of the value added tax on foods and beverages, a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and stricter regulation of food marketing directed at children. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that Germany makes insufficient use of the potential of evidence-informed health-promoting nutrition policies. Adopting international best practices in key policy areas could help to reduce the burden of nutrition-related chronic disease and related inequalities in nutrition and health in Germany. Implementation of relevant policies requires political leadership, a broad societal dialogue and evidence-informed advocacy by civil society, including the scientific community. Cambridge University Press 2022-06 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9991688/ /pubmed/34881689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021004742 Text en © The Authors 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
von Philipsborn, Peter
Geffert, Karin
Klinger, Carmen
Hebestreit, Antje
Stratil, Jan
Rehfuess, Eva Annette
Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index
title Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index
title_full Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index
title_fullStr Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index
title_full_unstemmed Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index
title_short Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index
title_sort nutrition policies in germany: a systematic assessment with the food environment policy index
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021004742
work_keys_str_mv AT vonphilipsbornpeter nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex
AT geffertkarin nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex
AT klingercarmen nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex
AT hebestreitantje nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex
AT stratiljan nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex
AT rehfuessevaannette nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex
AT nutritionpoliciesingermanyasystematicassessmentwiththefoodenvironmentpolicyindex